Urate is produced in the liver by the degradation of purines from the diet and nucleotide turnover and excreted by the kidney and gut. The kidney is the major route of urate removal and has a pivotal role in the regulation of urate homeostasis. Approximately 10% of the glomerular filtered urate is excreted in the urine, and the remainder is reabsorbed by the proximal tubule. However, the transport of urate in the proximal tubule is bidirectional: reabsorption and secretion. Thus, an increase in reabsorption or a decrease in secretion may induce hyperuricemia.In contrast, a decrease in reabsorption or an increase in secretion may result in hyperuricosuria. In the proximal tubule, urate reabsorption is mainly mediated by apical URAT1 (SLC22A12) and basolateral GLUT9 (SLC2A9) transporter. OAT4 (SLC22A11) also acts in urate reabsorption in the apical membrane, and its polymorphism is associated with the risk of hyperuricemia. Renal hypouricemia is caused by SLC22A12 or SLC2A9 loss-of-function mutations, and it may be complicated by exercise-induced acute kidney injury. URAT1 and GLUT9 are also drug targets for uricosuric agents. Sodium-glucose cotransporter inhibitors may induce hyperuricosuria by inhibiting GLUT9b located in the apical plasma membrane. Urate secretion is mediated by basolateral OAT1 (SLC22A6) and OAT3 (SLC22A8) and apical ATP-binding cassette super-family G member 2 (>ABCG2), NPT1 (SLC17A1), and NPT4 (SLC17A3) transporter in the proximal tubule. NPT1 and NPT4 may be key players in renal urate secretion in humans, and deletion of SLC22A6 and SLC22A8 in mice leads to decreased urate excretion. Dysfunctional variants of >ABCG2 inhibit urate secretion from the gut and kidney and may cause gout. In summary, the net result of urate transport in the proximal tubule is determined by the dominance of transporters between reabsorption (URAT1, OAT4, and GLUT9) and secretion (ABCG2, NPT1, NPT4, OAT1, and OAT3).

Purpose: Proctectomy for the treatment of rectal cancer results in inevitable changes to bowel habits. Symptoms such as fecal incontinence, constipation, and tenesmus are collectively referred to as low anterior resection syndrome (LARS). Among the several risk factors that cause LARS, anastomotic leakage (AL) is a strong risk factor for permanent stoma formation. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between the severity of LARS and AL in patients with rectal cancer based on the LARS score and the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) defecation symptom questionnaires. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent low anterior resection for rectal cancer since January 2010. Patients who completed the questionnaire were classified into the AL group and control group based on medical and imaging records. Major LARS and MSKCC scores were analyzed as primary endpoints. Results: Among the 179 patients included in this study, 37 were classified into the AL group. After propensity score matching, there were significant differences in the ratio of major LARS and MSKCC scores of the control group and AL group (ratio of major LARS: 11.1% and 37.8%, P<0.001; MSKCC score: 67.29±10.4 and 56.49±7.2, respectively, P<0.001). Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that AL was an independent factor for major LARS occurrence and MSKCC score. Conclusion This study showed that AL was a significant factor in the occurrence of major LARS and defecation symptoms after proctectomy.

Purpose: Hand-eye discordance during laparoscopic colon surgery is an obstacle to the assistant. We evaluated the usefulness of a 180° rotatable laparoscopic monitor for the colorectal surgery assistant to overcome hand-eye discordance. Methods: Twenty-six residents of the department of surgery (novice group, n=13; experienced group, n=13) participated in this study. They performed grasping a ring and transferring it to standing bars on a laparoscopic training kit under the conventional view and a 180° rotated monitor view. We defined successful performance when this procedure was completed in 3 minutes. Results: The number of successful performance was higher under the 180° rotated monitor view than under the conventional view monitor (6.88±2.79 vs. 0.92±0.80, p<0.01). Under the 180° rotated monitor view, the experienced group had a higher number of successful performances than the novice group (8.31±2.59 vs. 5.46±2.26, p=0.009). However, no statistically significant difference was found between the two groups under the conventional view (1.23±0.93 vs. 0.62±0.51, p=0.091). Conclusion This study shows the usefulness of a 180° rotated monitor view to overcome hand-eye discordance, which adversely affects the laparoscopic performance of the colorectal surgery assistant.

The diagnostic and prognostic potential of an onco-metabolite, 2-hydroxyglutarate (2HG) as a proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-MRS) detectable biomarker of the isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-mutated (IDH-MT) gliomas has drawn attention of neuroradiologists recently. However, due to severe spectral overlap with background signals, quantification of 2HG can be very challenging. In this technical review for neuroradiologists, first, the biochemistry of 2HG and its significance in the diagnosis of IDH-MT gliomas are summarized. Secondly, various 1H-MRS methods used in the previous studies are outlined. Finally, wereview previous in vivo studies, and discuss the current status of 1H-MRS in the diagnosis of IDH-MT gliomas.
Biochemistry ; Diagnosis ; Glioma* ; Isocitrate Dehydrogenase ; Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy ; Proton Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy* ; Protons*

Background: This study aimed to compare the effects of applying a vibrating foam roller before resistance exercise versus after resistance exercise on changes in serum muscle damage markers, muscle stiffness, and range of motion. This study also aimed to provide foundational data for optimizing the timing of vibrating foam roller application to enhance recovery after resistance exercise in practical settings. Methods: Twelve healthy adult males were recruited as participants. Each participant was subjected to three interventions in a random order with a washout period of at least 5 days: vibration foam rolling before resistance exercise, vibration foam rolling after resistance exercise, and resistance exercise without vibration foam rolling. Blood creatine kinase, knee flexion range of motion, and muscle stiffness were measured before, immediately after, 24 hours after, and 48 hours after exercise and foam rolling protocols. Results: Creatine kinase levels in vibration foam rolling after resistance exercise were significantly lower than those in vibration foam rolling before resistance exercise at 24 and 48 hours post-exercise. Muscle stiffness was significantly lower immediately and 24 hours post-exercise in vibration foam rolling after resistance exercise than in vibration foam rolling before resistance exercise and resistance exercise without vibration foam rolling. Knee flexion range of motion was significantly lower in resistance exercise without vibration foam rolling than in vibration foam rolling after resistance exercise at 24 and 48 hours post-exercise. Conclusions The application of vibration foam rolling after resistance exercise was more effective than that before exercise in decreasing muscle damage markers, reducing muscle stiffness, and improving the range of motion.

Background: This study aimed to compare the effects of applying a vibrating foam roller before resistance exercise versus after resistance exercise on changes in serum muscle damage markers, muscle stiffness, and range of motion. This study also aimed to provide foundational data for optimizing the timing of vibrating foam roller application to enhance recovery after resistance exercise in practical settings. Methods: Twelve healthy adult males were recruited as participants. Each participant was subjected to three interventions in a random order with a washout period of at least 5 days: vibration foam rolling before resistance exercise, vibration foam rolling after resistance exercise, and resistance exercise without vibration foam rolling. Blood creatine kinase, knee flexion range of motion, and muscle stiffness were measured before, immediately after, 24 hours after, and 48 hours after exercise and foam rolling protocols. Results: Creatine kinase levels in vibration foam rolling after resistance exercise were significantly lower than those in vibration foam rolling before resistance exercise at 24 and 48 hours post-exercise. Muscle stiffness was significantly lower immediately and 24 hours post-exercise in vibration foam rolling after resistance exercise than in vibration foam rolling before resistance exercise and resistance exercise without vibration foam rolling. Knee flexion range of motion was significantly lower in resistance exercise without vibration foam rolling than in vibration foam rolling after resistance exercise at 24 and 48 hours post-exercise. Conclusions The application of vibration foam rolling after resistance exercise was more effective than that before exercise in decreasing muscle damage markers, reducing muscle stiffness, and improving the range of motion.

Background: This study aimed to compare the effects of applying a vibrating foam roller before resistance exercise versus after resistance exercise on changes in serum muscle damage markers, muscle stiffness, and range of motion. This study also aimed to provide foundational data for optimizing the timing of vibrating foam roller application to enhance recovery after resistance exercise in practical settings. Methods: Twelve healthy adult males were recruited as participants. Each participant was subjected to three interventions in a random order with a washout period of at least 5 days: vibration foam rolling before resistance exercise, vibration foam rolling after resistance exercise, and resistance exercise without vibration foam rolling. Blood creatine kinase, knee flexion range of motion, and muscle stiffness were measured before, immediately after, 24 hours after, and 48 hours after exercise and foam rolling protocols. Results: Creatine kinase levels in vibration foam rolling after resistance exercise were significantly lower than those in vibration foam rolling before resistance exercise at 24 and 48 hours post-exercise. Muscle stiffness was significantly lower immediately and 24 hours post-exercise in vibration foam rolling after resistance exercise than in vibration foam rolling before resistance exercise and resistance exercise without vibration foam rolling. Knee flexion range of motion was significantly lower in resistance exercise without vibration foam rolling than in vibration foam rolling after resistance exercise at 24 and 48 hours post-exercise. Conclusions The application of vibration foam rolling after resistance exercise was more effective than that before exercise in decreasing muscle damage markers, reducing muscle stiffness, and improving the range of motion.

Background: This study aimed to compare the effects of applying a vibrating foam roller before resistance exercise versus after resistance exercise on changes in serum muscle damage markers, muscle stiffness, and range of motion. This study also aimed to provide foundational data for optimizing the timing of vibrating foam roller application to enhance recovery after resistance exercise in practical settings. Methods: Twelve healthy adult males were recruited as participants. Each participant was subjected to three interventions in a random order with a washout period of at least 5 days: vibration foam rolling before resistance exercise, vibration foam rolling after resistance exercise, and resistance exercise without vibration foam rolling. Blood creatine kinase, knee flexion range of motion, and muscle stiffness were measured before, immediately after, 24 hours after, and 48 hours after exercise and foam rolling protocols. Results: Creatine kinase levels in vibration foam rolling after resistance exercise were significantly lower than those in vibration foam rolling before resistance exercise at 24 and 48 hours post-exercise. Muscle stiffness was significantly lower immediately and 24 hours post-exercise in vibration foam rolling after resistance exercise than in vibration foam rolling before resistance exercise and resistance exercise without vibration foam rolling. Knee flexion range of motion was significantly lower in resistance exercise without vibration foam rolling than in vibration foam rolling after resistance exercise at 24 and 48 hours post-exercise. Conclusions The application of vibration foam rolling after resistance exercise was more effective than that before exercise in decreasing muscle damage markers, reducing muscle stiffness, and improving the range of motion.

Objectives: This study investigated associations between perceptions of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and the prevalence of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in workers at hospitals designated to treat COVID-19, as well as the difference in the magnitude of these associations by occupational type and previous Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) experience. Methods: The participants were workers at hospitals designated to treat COVID-19 who completed a questionnaire about their perceptions related to COVID-19, work experience during the previous MERS-CoV outbreak, and symptoms of PTSD ascertained by the PTSD Checklist for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Participants’ characteristics were compared using the chi-square test. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to evaluate the associations between perceptions and the prevalence of PTSD, stratified by occupational type and previous MERS-CoV experience. Results: Non-medical personnel showed stronger associations with PTSD than medical personnel according to general fear (odds ratio [OR], 6.67; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.92 to 23.20), shortages of supplies (OR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.07 to 1.56), and issue-specific fear (OR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.05 to 1.59). Those with prior MERS-CoV quarantine experience were more prone to PTSD than those without such experience in terms of general fear (OR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.22 to 2.37), shortages of supplies (OR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.10 to 1.40), and issue-specific fear (OR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.06 to 1.38). Conclusions During the COVID-19 pandemic, non-medical personnel tended to have higher odds of being categorized as having PTSD. Workers with prior MERS-CoV experience were more susceptible than those without such experience. These findings suggest the need for timely interventions to manage human resources for a sustainable quarantine system.

Objectives: This study investigated associations between perceptions of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and the prevalence of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in workers at hospitals designated to treat COVID-19, as well as the difference in the magnitude of these associations by occupational type and previous Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) experience. Methods: The participants were workers at hospitals designated to treat COVID-19 who completed a questionnaire about their perceptions related to COVID-19, work experience during the previous MERS-CoV outbreak, and symptoms of PTSD ascertained by the PTSD Checklist for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Participants’ characteristics were compared using the chi-square test. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to evaluate the associations between perceptions and the prevalence of PTSD, stratified by occupational type and previous MERS-CoV experience. Results: Non-medical personnel showed stronger associations with PTSD than medical personnel according to general fear (odds ratio [OR], 6.67; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.92 to 23.20), shortages of supplies (OR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.07 to 1.56), and issue-specific fear (OR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.05 to 1.59). Those with prior MERS-CoV quarantine experience were more prone to PTSD than those without such experience in terms of general fear (OR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.22 to 2.37), shortages of supplies (OR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.10 to 1.40), and issue-specific fear (OR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.06 to 1.38). Conclusions During the COVID-19 pandemic, non-medical personnel tended to have higher odds of being categorized as having PTSD. Workers with prior MERS-CoV experience were more susceptible than those without such experience. These findings suggest the need for timely interventions to manage human resources for a sustainable quarantine system.