Background: Antimicrobial resistance is a global problem that is perpetuated by the inappropriate use of antibiotics among doctors. This study aims to assess the antibiotic prescription rate for patients with acute upper respiratory infection (URI) and acute diarrhoea. Methods: A completed clinical audit cycle was conducted in 2018 in the busy emergency department of a public hospital in Malaysia. Pre- and post-intervention antibiotic prescription data were collected, and changes were implemented through a multifaceted intervention similar to Thailand’s Antibiotics Smart Use programme. Results: Data from a total of 1,334 pre-intervention and 1,196 post-intervention patients were collected from the hospital’s electronic medical records. The mean (SD) age of participants was 19.88 (17.994) years. The pre-intervention antibiotic prescription rate was 11.2% for acute diarrhoea and 29.1% for acute URI, both of which are above the average national rates. These antibiotic prescription rates significantly reduced post-intervention to 6.2% and 13.7%, respectively, falling below national averages. Antibiotic prescription rate was highest for young children. There were no significant changes in rates of re-attendance or hospital admission following the intervention. Conclusion: The multifaceted intervention, which included continuing medical education, physician reminders and patient awareness, was effective in improving the antibiotic prescription rates for these two conditions.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Warfarin and aspirin are commonly used to prevent cardiovascular diseases. Aspirin was recently found to have chemopreventive effects on colon cancer and polyps by inhibiting cyclooxygenase-2. Therefore, we evaluated whether the symptoms of bleeding related with aspirin or warfarin could be a clue in early detection of colon cancer. We also assessed the effect of aspirin on the development of synchronous polyps. METHODS: A total of forty-one and 16 patients diagnosed as colon cancer, taking aspirin or warfarin respectively were enrolled. In addition, 171 patients with colon cancers were age and gender matched as a control group. We investigated the difference of clinical features and laboratory findings among three groups. RESULTS: The incidence of bleeding was 81.3% (warfarin), 53.7% (aspirin), 40.4% (control). Among three groups, location and size of cancer, number of lymph nodes involvement and stages were not different, but the number of patients in Duke stage D in warfarin group (n=1, 6.3%) were less than that of the control (n=44, 25.7%) (p=0.049). The extent of circumferencial involvement by cancer was lower in aspirin group (67%) than in the control group (80%) (p=0.035). The percentage of patients with synchronous polyps and mean number of synchronous polyps in aspirin group (34.1%, 0.68, respectively) was lower than that of control group (53.6%, 1.69, respectively) (p=0.029, 0.008, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Bleeding related with aspirin or warfarin usage had no effect on the early diagnosis of colon cancer. However, lower incidence of Duke stage D in warfarin group might be related to anti-metastatic effect of warfarin. In addition, aspirin may have a role in suppressing the development of synchronous polyps.
Aged ; Anticoagulants/adverse effects/therapeutic use ; Aspirin/adverse effects/*therapeutic use ; Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control ; Colonic Neoplasms/*diagnosis/pathology ; English Abstract ; Female ; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/chemically induced ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/adverse effects/*therapeutic use ; Warfarin/adverse effects/*therapeutic use

The aim of this Biologic Advisory Group (BAG) Malaysia consensus guideline is to provide clinicians managing cutaneous diseases with biologics relevant parameters to consider prior to initiating or stopping or continuing any biologic treatment in the current landscape of the COVID-19 pandemic. Besides reviewing the medical literatures on COVID-19 and evidences related to other human coronavirus or influenza, expert opinions and clinical experiences are shared and debated in formulation of this biologic consensus guideline.