1.The Comparison of the Effect of Enflurane and Propofol on Arterial Oxygenation during One-Lung Ventilation.
Sung Sik KANG ; In Chul CHOI ; Jin Mee JOUNG ; Ji Yeon SHIN ; Myung Won CHO
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology 1997;33(6):1121-1128
BACKGROUND: Controversy exists as to whether or not inhalation anesthetics and intravenous anesthetics impair arterial oxygenation (PaO2) during one lung ventilation (OLV). Accordingly, we examined the effect of enflurane and propofol on PaO2 and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) during OLV. METHODS: Forty patients, who had prolonged periods of OLV anesthesia with minimal trauma to the nonventilated lung were studied in a cross over design. Patients were randomized to four groups; Group 1 received 1 MAC of enflurane and oxygen from induction until the first 20 min after complete lung collapse, then were switched to propofol 100 g/kg/min (P100). In group 2, the order of the anesthetics was reversed. Group 3, Group 4 received the same order of the anesthetics as Group 1, Group 2, respectively but received propofol 200 g/kg/min (P200). RESULTS: During OLV, the PaO2 values were lower than those with two lung ventilation (TLV), there were no significant differences among each groups and between propofol and enflurane in PaO2, but in the selected patients (n=10, PaO2<120 mmHg during OLV), PaO2 in propofol group was higher than that of enflurane group (p<0.05). Conversion from TLV to OLV caused a significant increase in PVR, but there were no difference in PVR between propofol and enflurane group. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the usual clinical dose of propofol affords no advantage over 1 MAC of enflurane anesthesia except low PaO2 patients during OLV. Propofol might be of value in risk patients of hypoxemia during thoracic surgery when OLV is planned.
Anesthesia
;
Anesthetics
;
Anesthetics, Inhalation
;
Anesthetics, Intravenous
;
Anoxia
;
Cross-Over Studies
;
Enflurane*
;
Humans
;
Lung
;
One-Lung Ventilation*
;
Oxygen*
;
Propofol*
;
Pulmonary Atelectasis
;
Thoracic Surgery
;
Vascular Resistance
;
Ventilation
2.Prognostic Significance of the Expression of MRP and p53 in Colorectal Carcinoma.
Ji Young CHANG ; Young Don MIN ; Kweon Cheon KIM ; Sung Chul LIM
Journal of the Korean Society of Coloproctology 1998;14(3):365-374
Although MDR was previously thought to be predominantly caused by the expression of the MDR1 gene, it is now increasingly believed to be caused by other mechanism. Recently, over-expression of the multidrug resistance-associated protein (MRP) was suggested a possible mechanism for non-Pgp mediated MDR. Recent studies showed that MRP can confer resistance to a wide spectrum of natural product drug, but the clinical relevance of MRP-mediated MDR in human cancer is poorly understood. p53 is the most widely known tumor suppressor gene. It has been suggested that mutant p53 is related to abnormal proliferation of cell and some what is been related to cellular apoptosis. To determine the clinical significance of MRP and/or p53 expression in colorectal carcinoma, the authors investigated the expression of the MRP and p53 in 81 cases of primary colorectal carcinoma, the relationship between the MRP and/or p53 expression and clinical parameters including 5-yr. survival rate, and the relationship between the expression of MRP and p53. The results were as follows: 1) Of the 81 colorectal carcinomas, 36 (42%) were MRP positive and 28 (34%) were p53 positive. 2) The expression of MRP and/or p53 was not significantly correlated with sex, age, histologic grades, tumor invasion, tumor location, tumor size, lymph node metastasis, TNM stage and survival of patients. In conclusion, these results suggest that expression of MRP and/or p53 is neither related to the known prognostic factors nor a prognostic factor by itself.
Apoptosis
;
Colorectal Neoplasms*
;
Genes, Tumor Suppressor
;
Humans
;
Lymph Nodes
;
Multidrug Resistance-Associated Proteins
;
Neoplasm Metastasis
;
Prognosis
;
Survival Rate
4.Valgus High Tibial Osteotomy for Osteoarthritis of the Knee
Woo Shin CHO ; Sung Il BIN ; Ki Kwang CHEONG ; Ji Chul KIM ; Key Yong KIM
The Journal of the Korean Orthopaedic Association 1995;30(6):1624-1630
Recently there has been decreasing trend of high tibial osteotomy in management of the gonarthrotic patients partly due to recurrence of the symptom and, more importantly, due to the relative success of the total knee joint replacement procedure. But there is still room for the high tibial osteotomy, although it may be 'outdated' procedure, in that younger active patients do well postopera- tively for an enough period of time and that even the older have some gain of pain-relief in early postoperative period. The purpose of this study is to detect the affecting factors of the result of the operation. We reviewed 25 valgus high tibial osteotomies in 23 patients who had medial gonarthrosis and could be followed-up more than 1 year among 32 cases between August 1989 and January 1994. The mean length of follow-up was 30 months(ranged twelve to fifty four months). The results were compared according to modified grading of the HSS score. All cases showed the increase of the score from preop. average 65.2 points to postop. 87.8 points, mainly by the decrease of pain and the increase of functional activity. The severity of degenerative change on the radiographs and the degree of varus seemed to be related with the early clinical results of the operation, but the age was not a major affecting factor. These results could be debatable due to some differences from the others', and long term follow-up would be needed.
Follow-Up Studies
;
Humans
;
Knee Joint
;
Knee
;
Osteoarthritis
;
Osteotomy
;
Postoperative Period
;
Recurrence