Background: This study aimed to assess the severity of postoperative delirium (PD) in elderly patients who underwent reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) for irreparable massive rotator cuff tears (mRCTs) under general anesthesia (GA) compared to those under interscalene block (IB). Methods: Forty elderly patients aged 65 years or older diagnosed with an irreparable mRCT who underwent rTSA were included in the prospective case-controlled study. Of these, 20 patients were operated under GA and the other 20 under IB. The average age was 77.1 years (range, 65–95 years). The severity of delirious symptoms was evaluated by the Delirium Rating Scale–revised–98 (DRS) score from the patients or guardians before the surgery and at 0, 3, and 7 days and 1, 3, and 6 months after the surgery and compared between the 2 groups. Results: Immediately after surgery, the visual analog scale score difference between the groups was statistically significant, with the GA group at 6.25 (standard deviation, ± 0.85) and the IB group at 3.80 (± 0.62) (p < 0.001). On the day of operation, the mean DRS score in the GA and IB groups were 9.10 (± 5.63) and 6.60 (± 5.33), respectively (p = 0.157). On day 3 of surgery, the mean DRS score in the GA group peaked to 9.95 (± 8.73), while in the IB group, it declined to 6.40 (±5.81) (p = 0.138). After 3 days, DRS scores showed a decreasing trend in both groups. When comparing the mean change (∆) from the preoperative baseline scores to the postoperative values, the ∆DRS score was significantly higher with 4.15 (± 4.53) points in the GA group as compared to 1.30 (± 1.92) in the IB group (p = 0.014). Conclusions IB can be an attractive and efficient anesthetic choice in preventing PD for elderly patients undergoing rTSA for irreparable mRCTs. The IB group showed lower DRS scores and a peak on day 0 compared to the higher DRS scores and peak on day 3 in the GA group. Additionally, IB showed less pain than GA.

Background: The tibiofibular syndesmosis is essential for preserving the stability of the ankle. Acute syndesmotic injuries with evident or latent instability usually warrant surgical interventions. This cadaveric study examines and compares biomechanical characteristics between the following treatments for syndesmosis injuries: suture-button fixation plus syndesmotic repair and screw fixation. Methods: The lower extremities of 10 cadavers disarticulated at the knee joints were used, yielding 20 feet. Ten feet underwent surgery using the suture-button fixation with syndesmotic repair, while the remaining 10 feet underwent surgery using screw fixation. Before surgical treatment of syndesmosis injuries, each cadaveric lower limb underwent preliminary physiological cyclic loading, which was followed by a series of postfixation cyclic loading tests after the surgical procedure. Results: Our principal finding is that suture-button fixation with syndesmotic repair provided torsional strength comparable to that of screw fixation. The mean failure torque did not differ between the 2 groups, but the rotational stiffness was significantly lower in the suture-button fixation/augmentation group. Conclusions Suture-button fixation/augmentation facilitates flexible (physiological) syndesmosis movement and may be a useful alternative treatment for ankle syndesmosis injury.

Background: Meniscal scaffold implantation has been introduced as a treatment for meniscal injuries, but there is still no clear consensus on its clinical impact, including its chondroprotective effect. This review aimed to assess the chondroprotective effects, clinical outcomes, and survivorship of meniscal scaffold implantation compared to meniscectomy, as well as among different types of scaffolds. Methods: A comprehensive search strategy was performed on the databases of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar, encompassing articles published until June 1, 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) and comparative studies published in English that reported results using collagen meniscal implant (CMI) and polyurethane meniscal scaffold for meniscal tear were included. Results: A total of 421 studies were initially identified across databases, and a systematic review was conducted on 8 studies involving 596 patients. Among the 5 studies that addressed the chondroprotective effect, none found that meniscal scaffolds had a higher chondroprotective effect compared to meniscectomy. In studies comparing CMI and meniscectomy, the Lysholm score results showed a mean difference (MD) range between –5.90 and –4.40. In the case of visual analog scale score, the MD ranged from –1.0 to 1.0. In studies comparing polyurethane meniscal scaffolds and CMI, the Tegner score results showed an MD range of –2.0 to 0.4. Conclusions There was no superiority in chondroprotective effects for both CMI and polyurethane meniscal scaffolds compared to meniscectomy. Although meniscal scaffolds may provide improvements in clinical outcomes, no clinically relevant differences were observed in comparison to meniscectomy. There are no discernible differences between the 2 types of scaffolds.

Background: Anterior dislocation in epilepsy patients is relatively severe, difficult to treat, and prone to recurrence. The purpose of this study was to compare the results of arthroscopic Bankart repair and the open Latarjet procedure in epilepsy patients who had anterior shoulder instability and to compare the results of the open Latarjet procedure in epilepsy and non-epileptic groups. Methods: A total of 57 shoulders (34 dominant) in 55 patients (18–50 years, 45 men and 10 women) with anterior glenohumeral instability were included in the study and the average follow-up was 24 months. Out of 21 epilepsy patients (23 shoulders), 11 were treated with the open Latarjet procedure and 12 with arthroscopic Bankart repair. Additionally, comparisons were made between the 34 non-epileptic patients who underwent the open Latarjet procedure and the epilepsy patients who underwent the same procedure. Results: In the epilepsy group, all 12 patients who underwent Bankart repair had on-track lesions, and all 11 patients who underwent the Latarjet procedure had off-track lesions. In the non-epilepsy group, all cases were off-track lesions. In the epilepsy group, there was no significant difference in the postoperative clinical outcome and recurrence rate between the Bankart repair and Latarjet procedure groups. In the Latarjet group, postoperative re-dislocation rate in the non-epilepsy patients was 14% (5/34 cases), compared to 45% (5/11 cases) in the epilepsy patients, 4 of which 4 occurred during seizures. It was 41% in the Bankart repair group for on-track lesions, which was similar to the recurrence rate after the Latarjet for off-track lesions in the epilepsy group. Conclusions After the Latarjet procedure, the functional outcomes in the epilepsy group were similar to those in the non-epilepsy group, except for the higher re-dislocation rate. With either of the surgical procedures, the re-dislocation rate secondary to seizures was very high. Despite the presence of on-track lesions, the Latarjet procedure would be more preferrable for anterior stabilization in epilepsy patients, in view of the high recurrence rate with arthroscopic Bankart repair.

Background: Not reducing the posterior malleolar fragment could have an impact on the alignment and stability of syndesmosis since the posterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (PITFL) originates at the posterior malleolar fragment. Given that these alignment and stability changes may contribute to discomfort and pain, further research may be required. We think that our new classification method will be able to help improve understanding of treatment methods for posterior malleolar fractures. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 206 patients who underwent surgeries for ankle fractures in our orthopedic clinic between April 2014 and December 2022 and were verified to have posterior malleolar fractures in plain radiography, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We performed a probing test to determine whether syndesmosis was stable. Results: We were able to classify the 206 cases into the following 5 types: type 1 (31 cases, 15.0%), extraincisural fragment with an intact fibular notch; type 2 (98 cases, 47.5%), posterolateral fragment extending into the fibular notch; type 3 (37 cases, 17.9%), posteromedial 2-part fragment involving the medial malleolus; type 4 (19 cases, 9.2%), large posterolateral triangular fragment;and type 5 (21 cases, 10.1%), shell-like PITFL avulsion (< 2 mm) in a CT axial view or PITFL periosteal sleeve avulsion (PITPSA) in arthroscopic or MRI findings. Conclusions This new system that adds the PITPSA type for the classification of posterior malleolar fractures may be a useful approach to managing these injuries and may aid in treatment decision-making. It could be important to consider ligament surgery when treating PITPSA.

Background: To identify the optimal surgical technique for single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), this study compared surgical outcomes and incidence of adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) in patients undergoing single-level ACDF using cage alone single-level fusion and plate fixation techniques. Methods: This single-center retrospective study (2003–2018) included patients who underwent single-level ACDF with either plate fixation (PLATE) or cage (CAGE) alone. The radiologic and clinical outcomes between the 2 surgical groups were compared over a 4-year follow-up period. Outcomes of interest included parameters related to range of motion, sagittal alignment, as well as fusion, subsidence, and ASD rates. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Neck Disability Index (NDI) and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain. Dysphagia and hoarseness rates were estimated based on medical records. Results: Forty-seven patients were included (n=17 in CAGE group). In the CAGE group, 94.1% of the patients had Bridwell grade 1 or 2, compared to 83.3% in the PLATE group (p = 0.396). Subsidence occurred in 12.5% and 3.6% of the CAGE and PLATE cases, respectively (p = 0.543). Segmental kyphosis progressed in the CAGE group compared to the PLATE group at 12, 24, and 48 months (p < 0.001). Radiographic ASD was observed in 41.2% and 30.0% of patients in the CAGE and PLATE groups, respectively, with a higher incidence in the upper segments for both groups. Preoperative NDI scores were similar between the groups; however, postoperatively, the CAGE group had significantly lower NDI scores (3.50 ± 2.74 vs. 8.00 ± 5.81) at 4 years (p = 0.020). Neck pain VAS scores also showed significant improvement in the CAGE group (2.33 ± 2.94) compared with that in the PLATE group (3.07 ± 2.31) at 4 years (p = 0.045). Both groups showed comparable arm pain VAS scores at 2 and 4 years postoperatively. Postoperative dysphagia occurred in 1 patient in the PLATE group, resolving almost completely by 1 year. Conclusions Single-level ACDF using a cage alone technique demonstrated favorable radiologic and clinical outcomes overall compared to plate-augmented ACDF. However, plate augmentation is recommended for patients with severe cervical kyphosis or those at high risk of subsidence.