A 26-year-old woman who had myasthenia gravis (MG) experienced several instances of sunburns. A phototest was performed by ultraviolet (UV) A, UVB and visible light irradiation to the back surface of the sunburns. Numerous erythematous papules developed at the 20, 25, 30 J/cm2 UVA irradiated site. The phototest induced lesions were compatible with polymorphic light eruption (PMLE) with action spectrum in the UVA range. After immunosuppresant treatment, the MG and PMLE were in a well-controlled state. We report MG associated with PMLE followed with a literature review.
Adult ; Female ; Humans ; Light ; Myasthenia Gravis* ; Sunburn

A total of 40 adult black-mice was used and divided into two groups for expeiment. Group A was irradiated by UVB only and Group B had SPF 15 sunscreen a.pplied to the back followed by irradiation by UVB. Each group was divided again into 5 subgroups according to the days of UVB irradiation frcm 2 to 10 days. A Waldmann combination UVA+UVB Radiation Treatment Cabin 8001 was used as the light source and the UVB dosage was 50 mJ/cm2 daily. Skin specimens were taken 24 hours after the last irradiation. Histologic changes in epidermis were reviewed by the light microscope. In group A, the characteristic sunburn cells(SBC) were observed with 100 mJ/ cm2. SBC number was maximum with 400 mJ/cm2. The other epidermal changes were parakerat.osis, crusts, atypical cells, and mitoses of basal cells, which showed graded responses to the UVB doses. Pretreatment with the sunscreen completely prevented these changes.
Adult ; Epidermis ; Humans ; Keratinocytes* ; Mitosis ; Skin ; Sunburn

This study was done to study the effect of UVA radiation upon sunburn cell formation by UVB. In this study a total of 67 ICR male albino haired mice were used. The results were as follows: 1. UVA radiation produce a little or no sunburn cell in doses 5 J/cm(2), 10 J/cm(2), and 15 J/cm(2). 2. Preirradiation of UVA 5 J/cm, 10 J/cm(2), 15 J/cm(2) had no effect on the sunburn cell formation by UVB 20 mJ/cm(2), 80 mj/cm(2)
Animals ; Hair ; Humans ; Male ; Mice ; Sunburn*

index (%) in unirradiated mouse skin was 11.0+/-4.3. LI was significantly increased by tape stripping to 22.1+/-4.6. 2. The number of SBC in 1cm epidermis after 50mJ/cm UVB exposure was 28.2+/-4.1. The number of SBC was increased by tape stripping to 57.4+Cell proliferation, by evaluating sunburn cell (SBC) formation, was studied in mouse skin following tape stripping and ultraviolet light B (UVB) exposun.. 1-radiation was achieved using high pressure mercury are UVB. The results are summarized as follows. 1. Labeling 19.2. These results suggest that proliferating cells are more sensitive to UVB exposure.
Animals ; Cell Proliferation* ; Epidermis ; Mice ; Skin ; Sunburn* ; Ultraviolet Rays

This study was undertaken to investigate the quantitative change of sunburn cell(FiBC)production and ear swelling reaction(ESR)aecording to the UVA radiation dose and time course sfter PUVA treatment. A total of 75 ICR male albino haired mice were used as subjects. The results were as follows : 1. At 24 hours after PUVA treatment, the mean SBC numbers per cm length of epidermis were 29.1+13.6 with 1J/cm, 48.8+19.5 with 5J/cm, and 51.6+14. 8 with 10J/cm of UVA irradiation. SBC production was dose related with respect to radiation dose, but the increment was not so remarkable with more than 5J /cm of UVA irradiation. 2. [n PUVA treatment using 5J/cm of UVA, the mean SBC numbers per cm length of epiderrnis were 48.8+19.5 after 24 hours, 63.8+18.3 after 48 hours. SBC numbers rose to a maximum at 48 hours, but epidermal damage precludecl SBC counting after this. 3. At, 24 hours after PUVA treatment, no significant ESR was observed with 1 an3 5J/cm of UVA. In PUVA treatment using lOJ/cm of UVA, the mean ear thickness was 20.6+1.7( x 10mm) before treatment and 30.1+3.3( x 10mm') at 2h: hours after treatment, which showed significa.nt change(p<0.05). 4. In PUVA treatment using 5J(cm of UVA, ESR showed significant change at 43hours reaching a maximum at 72 hours. After 7 days, ESR was not measurable due to ear necrosis.
Animals ; Ear* ; Epidermis ; Hair ; Humans ; Male ; Mice* ; Necrosis ; Skin* ; Sunburn*

In this study, a total of 115 ICR male albino haired mice were used and divided into two groups(A & B) for experiment. In group A(65 mice), quantiatation of sunburn cell(SBC) production and its distribution according to the time course after ultraviolet irradiation was measured. In group B(50mice), quantitation of dose-response experiments for SBC production after ultraviolet irradiation was measured. The results were as follows: ]. SBCs were recognized by 2 hours after irradiation. There was a tendency to increase from 2 hours to 24 hours and decrease from then to l week after irradiation, 2. The increase of SBCs in lower epidermis 2 hours io 8 hours after exposure and in upper epidermis 24 hours after irradiation were statistically significant (p<0. 05). SBG number in all layers declined from 36 hours to 1 week after exposure. 3. The linear relationship which observed(y=8.09+0.85x, R=0.87) suggests a dose-response relationship between UVB dose and SBC number.
Animals ; Epidermis ; Hair ; Humans ; Male ; Mice* ; Skin* ; Sunburn*

BACKGROUND: Indomethacin is a potent inhibitor of prostaglandins biosysnthesis. Sunburn erythema is mainly mediated by prostaglandins. OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to compare objectively the effectiveness of topical indomethacin with topical corticosteroid on the suppression of UVB erythema METHODS: Sixteen male medical students who had not exposed their back skin during the last year were included in this study. According to the individual´s MED, 1,2, and 3 MED of UVB were irradiated on each back in triplicate lines. Immediately after UVB irradiation, 2.5% indomethacin solution and 0.25% desoximethasone were applied to each row with one row left for control. 24 hours after the initial application the intensity of each erythema was measured by the naked eye and by colorimeter. RESULTS: The suppressive effectiveness of 2.5% indomethacin solution on UVB induced erythema was superior to that of 0.25% desoximethasone. The L* and a* value of colorimeter were significantly correlated to the differencies of UVB induced erythema among the experimental and control groups is a useful and rapid method to evaluate the UVB induced erythema, and can give a numerical expression to eye perception. CONCLUSION: Our data confirm that topical indomethacin has a stronger suggestive effect on UVB erythema than that of topical corticosteroid.. We suggest that the suppressive effect of indomethacin is mainly due to the inhibition of prostaglandins biosynthesis. The colorimeter CR-200(MINOLTA) is well correlated with the naked eye score and is a useful instrument for objective measurement of the degree of erythema.
Erythema* ; Humans ; Indomethacin* ; Male ; Methods ; Prostaglandins ; Skin ; Students, Medical ; Sunburn

BACKGROUND: Ultraviolet light induces sunburn, aging of the skin, disorders of pigment and even promotes skin cancers. Melanin is known to have a protecting role in the skin by blocking ultraviolet light. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate UVA blocking effect of epidermal melanin and to compare UVA blocking effect among different anatomical sites. METHODS: From 20 vitiligo patients who had undergone an epidermal graft, we obtained epidermis of normal and vitiliginous skin and measured transmitted UVA energy density. RESULTS: The vitiliginous epidermis, devoid of melanin, blocked lower amount of UVA energy than the normal epidermis. 11.6% of irradiated UVA energy was blocked by epidermal melanin. No significant differences were observed in UVA blocking effect among different anatomical sites in normal and vitiliginous epidermis. CONCLUSION: Epidermal melanin has some UVA blocking effect. No significant differences were found in UVA blocking effect among different anatomical sites despite the differences in the density of melanin pigment among different sites of the body.
Aging ; Epidermis ; Humans ; Melanins* ; Skin ; Skin Neoplasms ; Sunburn ; Transplants ; Ultraviolet Rays ; Vitiligo*

The health-promoting qualities of ultraviolet light have been well recognized, but it also induces deleterious effects from sunburn to skin cancer, Since our enviroment exposes us to both ultraviolet and infrared rays at the same time, the latter is considered to influence to some extent the cutaneous effects of the former. In recent years, it has become increasingly apparent that the biologic effects of one type of radiation may be modified by wavelengths of different energies. Interactions of this kind are complex and occasionally result in true synergy or antagonism. Although there are several reports on these interactions, the results are not in accordance. This study was undertaken to investigate the influence of infrared radiation (IR) on ultraviolet radiation (UVR)-induced skin injury, especially minimal erythema dose (MED). Thirty-five healthy medical students participated in this study between May and June, 1983. One side of the back was exposed to IR with UVR while as a control the other side was exposed only to VVR. The results were summarized as follows : 1. In one experiment treated with IR before UVR, the mean MED-S.D. of the treated site was 17 7+5 3 (sec) and that of the control site was 18. 3-+6. 4 (sec)- The increase of the MED was statistically significant. (p<0. 01], paired t-test) Among the fifteen subjects, the MED was increased in 73% (11/15), and the same in 27% (4/15).
Erythema ; Humans ; Infrared Rays ; Skin Neoplasms ; Skin* ; Students, Medical ; Sunburn ; Ultraviolet Rays

BACKGROUND: Solar ultraviolet (UV) radiation induces sunburn, immune suppression, and various pigmentary disorders. Sunscreens are widely used to protect those untoward effects by UV but there are reports of phototoxicity or stability problems of sunscreens after exposure to UV. OBJECTIVE: We tried to compare sunscreens with different photostability in terms of their protection against various biologic responses like sunburn, immune suppression or pigmentation. METHODS: Three different sunscreens with SPF around 30 were used; Sunscreen-A (Sc-A) was photochemically inert, sunscreen-B (Sc-B) showed intermediate level of photostability, and sunscreen-C (Sc-C) was the least stable. To observe their in vivo effects, we measured sunscreen-protection against sunburn by back-skin swelling and sunburn cell formation, against immune suppression measured by depletion of Langerhans cells, local and systemic suppression of contact hypersensitivity (CHS), and against pigmentation by irradiation with mixed light source with UVA and UVB lamps that mimic solar UV spectrum. RESULTS: Back skin swellings by 5 kJ/m2 of UVB were protected well by sunscreens, but protection of Sc-C against 50 kJ/m2 of UVB was worse than Sc-A or Sc-B. Sunburn cells were increased significantly in mice irradiated with 5 kJ/m2 of UVB and it was protected by sunscreens, and the effect of photostability was minimal. Depletion of epidermal Langerhans cells by 5 kJ/m2 of UVB was protected completely by sunscreens. Local suppression of CHS by 5 kJ/m2 of UVB was protected by sunscreens, and Sc-A had better protection. But, in the experiment with 50 kJ/m2 of UVB, the protective efficacy was reversed; Sc-A showed worse protection. Systemic suppression of CHS by 10 kJ/m2 of UVB was protected well by sunscreens, and Sc-A had better protection and Sc-C had worse protection. In the experiment irradiated with 100 kJ/m2 of UVB, the protection of sunscreens was decreased, and Sc-B showed better protection, whereas Sc-C showed worse protection. In UV-induced pigmentation, all three sunscreens showed significant protection both by L* value and individual topographic angle (ITA) with the best protection by Sc-A and the worst protection by Sc-B. CONCLUSION: These data showed sunscreens can protect various in vivo responses and photostability of sunscreens played important roles particularly in the back-skin swelling and systemic suppression of CHS by high dose of UVB.
Animals ; Dermatitis, Contact ; Dermatitis, Phototoxic ; Langerhans Cells ; Mice ; Pigmentation ; Skin ; Sunburn ; Sunscreening Agents*