Cancer is a major cause of morbidity and the most common cause of death in Korea. There are currently approximately 200,000 incident cancer cases and 78,000 individuals die from cancer every year. The factors directly related to cancer incidence, including aging, smoking, obesity, and Westernized dietary habits, have been increasing during the past several decades. Since 1999, trends toward increased incidence have been observed for thyroid, breast (in women), colorectal, and prostate cancer. Currently, these trends have changed direction, and the incidence of stomach and liver cancer in both sexes, and cervical cancer in women have continually declined. Although the number of cancer deaths increased by a factor of 2.7 from 1983 to 2016, the age-standardized mortality associated with cancer has been decreasing by 3% every year. The 5-year relative survival rate (RSR) has also improved over the past several decades, especially for stomach, prostate, and breast cancer, which had 5-year RSRs greater than 90% in the most recent report.
Aging ; Breast ; Breast Neoplasms ; Cause of Death ; Epidemiology* ; Female ; Food Habits ; Humans ; Incidence ; Korea* ; Liver Neoplasms ; Mortality ; Obesity ; Prostate ; Prostatic Neoplasms ; Republic of Korea ; Smoke ; Smoking ; Stomach ; Survival Rate ; Thyroid Gland ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to investigate the association of the average volume of alcohol consumption and binge drinking with arterial stiffness. METHODS: The study population consisted of 5944 community-dwelling healthy adults aged 50 years and older. Average volume of alcohol consumption was calculated and frequency of binge drinking defined as the consumption of 7 or more drinks for men and 5 or more for women on a single occasion, was assessed using a structured interview. High brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV), a marker of arterial stiffness, was defined as the highest gender-specific quartile of maximal baPWV distribution in the study population. RESULTS: Compared to never drinkers, the multivariate-adjusted odds ratio (OR) of men who consumed 0.1-10.0, 10.1-20.0, 20.1-40.0, and >40.0 g/day was 0.93, 1.18, 1.38, and 2.36, respectively. The OR was 0.90, 0.97, 1.45, and 1.82 in women consuming 0.1-5.0, 5.1-10.0, 10.1-20.0, and >20.0 g/day, respectively. Binge drinking of <1 day/week (OR=1.66, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.13-2.42) and > or =1 day/week (OR=1.61, 95% CI=1.04-2.50) were associated with increased risk for high baPWV in men, and binge drinking of > or =1 day/week (OR=3.12, 95% CI=1.16-8.34) was associated with increased risk for high baPWV in women. CONCLUSIONS: A J-shaped relationship between the average volume of alcohol consumption and high baPWV was observed, suggesting the detrimental effects of heavy alcohol drinking on arterial stiffness. Binge drinking was also significant risk factors for increased arterial stiffness, independently of the average volume of alcohol consumption.
Adult ; Aged ; Alcohol Drinking ; Atherosclerosis ; Binge Drinking ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Odds Ratio ; Peripheral Arterial Disease ; Pulse Wave Analysis ; Risk Factors ; Vascular Stiffness

The incidence rate of primary liver cancer in Korea, the majority of which is hepatocellular carcinoma, has been decreasing steadily since 1999. However, Korea still has one of the highest incidence rates of liver cancer worldwide. Currently, liver cancer is the fifth most common cancer type in men and sixth in women. A total of 15,771 cases (11,774 men and 3,997 women) were identified, with an age-standardized incidence rate of 18.0 persons per 100,000 (29.2 in men and 7.9 in women) in 2016. Mortality from liver cancer has also decreased since 2002 in both sexes, although it is still the second most common cause of cancer deaths with 10,721 deaths (7,982 in men and 2,739 in women) in 2017. The 5-year relative survival rate was 13.2% in those diagnosed in 1996–2000, and it increased to 34.3% in those diagnosed in 2012–2016. Hepatitis B (HBV) and C (HCV) viruses are the most important causes of liver cancer, accounting for approximately 70% and 10% of liver cancer cases, respectively. Recently, the seroprevalence of HBV has markedly decreased to less than 3%, and the HCV antibody positivity rate has been estimated as about 0.7% in a nationwide survey. The participation rate of patients with hepatitis in liver cancer screening, a part of the National Cancer Screening Program, was still low at about 60% in 2018. Recent advances in the treatment of HBV and HCV could further reduce the burden of liver cancer despite its limited accessibility.
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular ; Early Detection of Cancer ; Epidemiology ; Female ; Hepatitis ; Hepatitis B ; Humans ; Incidence ; Korea ; Liver Neoplasms ; Liver ; Male ; Mass Screening ; Mortality ; Seroepidemiologic Studies ; Survival Rate

The incidence rate of primary liver cancer in Korea, the majority of which is hepatocellular carcinoma, has been decreasing steadily since 1999. However, Korea still has one of the highest incidence rates of liver cancer worldwide. Currently, liver cancer is the fifth most common cancer type in men and sixth in women. A total of 15,771 cases (11,774 men and 3,997 women) were identified, with an age-standardized incidence rate of 18.0 persons per 100,000 (29.2 in men and 7.9 in women) in 2016. Mortality from liver cancer has also decreased since 2002 in both sexes, although it is still the second most common cause of cancer deaths with 10,721 deaths (7,982 in men and 2,739 in women) in 2017. The 5-year relative survival rate was 13.2% in those diagnosed in 1996–2000, and it increased to 34.3% in those diagnosed in 2012–2016. Hepatitis B (HBV) and C (HCV) viruses are the most important causes of liver cancer, accounting for approximately 70% and 10% of liver cancer cases, respectively. Recently, the seroprevalence of HBV has markedly decreased to less than 3%, and the HCV antibody positivity rate has been estimated as about 0.7% in a nationwide survey. The participation rate of patients with hepatitis in liver cancer screening, a part of the National Cancer Screening Program, was still low at about 60% in 2018. Recent advances in the treatment of HBV and HCV could further reduce the burden of liver cancer despite its limited accessibility.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between the 5-year survival rate, socioeconomic status, and SEER (Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results) stage of stomach, colorectal, breast and cervical cancer patients. Methods: A total of 11,770 cases of four target cancers, which were diagnosed during 2005-2007, were extracted from the database of Gwangju-Jeonnam Regional Cancer Registry. The subjects of the study were 11,770 including stomach (n=5,479), colorectal (n=3,565), breast (n=1,516) and cervical cancers (n=710). Cox’s proportional hazards model was used to obtain the hazards ratio (HR) according to the SEER stage and socioeconomic status. Results: Stomach cancer had a significantly higher HR in the medical aid recipients (HR=1.39), and the group below 20% (HR=1.20) compared to the group with the highest income level. Colorectal cancer had a significantly higher HR in the medical aid recipients (HR=1.26) than in the group with the highest income level. In addition, stomach, colorectal, breast and cervical cancers had a significantly higher HR according to the SEER stage in regional direct (stomach=4.10, colorectal=1.76, breast=12.90, cervical=3.10), regional lymph only(stomach=2.58, colorectal=2.33, breast=4.32, cervical= 4.43), regional both (stomach=6.74 colorectal=3.04, breast=15.57 cervical=6.50), and regional NOS (Not Otherwise Specified)/distant (stomach=17.53, colorectal=11.53, breast=25.34, cervical=26.51) than in situ and localized only. Conclusion In order to increase the cancer survival rate, a support system for early detection and early treatment of cancer should be established for groups with low individual income levels, and regular health checkups and management measures should be actively implemented through the National Cancer Screening Program.

OBJECTIVES: Socioeconomic status plays an important role in health care and disease prevention. This study aimed to examine the association between socioeconomic status, measured by education levels and household income, and gastric cancer screening. METHODS: A total of 21,220 community-dwelling adults aged 40 to 69 years within a defined geographic area participated in a community health survey in 2009 and 2010. The survey was conducted using a structured questionnaire by trained investigators who visited the subjects' households directly. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine the relationship between self-reported participation in gastric cancer screening and socioeconomic variables (education and household income). RESULTS: The gastric cancer screening rate was 52.1% for subjects in their forties, 63.7% for those in their fifties, and 67.3% for those in their sixties. In multivariate analysis, higher education and income levels were associated with higher rates of gastric cancer screening (high school vs. elementary school: odds ratio [OR] 1.41, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.26-1.58; highest income quartile vs. lowest income quartile: OR 1.62, 95% CI 1.44-1.84). The gradient between income and screening rate was more pronounced in the population aged 40 to 49 years than in the other age groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that lower socioeconomic status is associated with decreased participation in gastric cancer screening. Our findings suggest that the screening program should be focused on low-income and less-educated populations, especially among younger adults, to reduce health disparities.
Adult ; Delivery of Health Care ; Education ; Family Characteristics ; Health Surveys ; Humans ; Logistic Models ; Mass Screening* ; Multivariate Analysis ; Odds Ratio ; Research Personnel ; Social Class* ; Stomach Neoplasms* ; Surveys and Questionnaires

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association between body mass index (BMI) and severe lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in Korean males. METHODS: This study was conducted on males aged ≥50 years who participated in the 2011 Korean Community Health Survey. LUTS severity was assessed using the Korean version of the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) questionnaire, and was dichotomized as severe (IPSS >19) and non-severe (IPSS ≤19). BMI was divided into 6 categories: <18.5, 18.5-22.9, 23.0-24.9, 25.0-27.4, 27.5-29.9, and ≥30.0 kg/m². To evaluate the relationship between BMI and LUTS, a survey-weighted multivariate Poisson regression analysis was performed to estimate prevalence rate ratios (PRRs). Age, smoking status, alcohol intake, physical activity, educational level, household income, and comorbidities were adjusted for in the multivariate model. RESULTS: A U-shaped relationship was detected between BMI and severe LUTS. Compared with a BMI of 23.0-24.9 kg/m², the PRR for a BMI <18.5 kg/m² was 1.65 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.35 to 2.02), that for a BMI of 18.5-22.9 kg/m² was 1.25 (95% CI, 1.09 to 1.44), that for a BMI of 25.0-27.4 kg/m² was 1.20 (95% CI, 1.00 to 1.45), that for a BMI of 27.5-29.9 kg/m² was 1.11 (95% CI, 0.83 to 1.47), and that for a BMI ≥30.0 kg/m² was 1.85 (95% CI, 1.18 to 2.88). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that both high and low BMI were associated with severe LUTS.
Body Mass Index ; Comorbidity ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Family Characteristics ; Health Surveys ; Humans ; Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms ; Male ; Motor Activity ; Prevalence ; Prostate ; Smoke ; Smoking

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association between body mass index (BMI) and severe lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in Korean males. METHODS: This study was conducted on males aged ≥50 years who participated in the 2011 Korean Community Health Survey. LUTS severity was assessed using the Korean version of the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) questionnaire, and was dichotomized as severe (IPSS >19) and non-severe (IPSS ≤19). BMI was divided into 6 categories: <18.5, 18.5-22.9, 23.0-24.9, 25.0-27.4, 27.5-29.9, and ≥30.0 kg/m². To evaluate the relationship between BMI and LUTS, a survey-weighted multivariate Poisson regression analysis was performed to estimate prevalence rate ratios (PRRs). Age, smoking status, alcohol intake, physical activity, educational level, household income, and comorbidities were adjusted for in the multivariate model. RESULTS: A U-shaped relationship was detected between BMI and severe LUTS. Compared with a BMI of 23.0-24.9 kg/m², the PRR for a BMI <18.5 kg/m² was 1.65 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.35 to 2.02), that for a BMI of 18.5-22.9 kg/m² was 1.25 (95% CI, 1.09 to 1.44), that for a BMI of 25.0-27.4 kg/m² was 1.20 (95% CI, 1.00 to 1.45), that for a BMI of 27.5-29.9 kg/m² was 1.11 (95% CI, 0.83 to 1.47), and that for a BMI ≥30.0 kg/m² was 1.85 (95% CI, 1.18 to 2.88). CONCLUSIONS This study showed that both high and low BMI were associated with severe LUTS.

BACKGROUND: This study was aimed at preparing basic data required for establishment of a cancer screening program by evaluating the screening rate and related factors in rural and urban areas. METHODS: The study population of 2,157 respondents was selected by a random cluster sampling method in one rural area (Gun) and one urban area (Gu). The subjects answered the structured questionnaire. The Andersen model was used to evaluate the related factors. RESULTS: The results by proportions of the study population who had received cancer screening tests in the last three years were 8.9% for stomach cancer, 10.5% for hepatic cancer, 4.5% for colorectal cancer, 46.3% for cervical cancer and 16.0% for breast cancer. Application of Andersen model revealed that sex, age, education level, economic status, knowledge and alcohol drinking for stomach cancer; sex age, knowledge alcohol drinking, and smoking for liver cancer; sex, age, education level, marital satus, knowledge, alcohol drinking, and smoking for colorectal cancer; age, eucational level, marital status, area, economic status and attitude for cervical cancer; age, area, attitude and family history for breast cancer were significant. CONCLUSION: These results could be used to develop a program that facilitates change of community people's knowledge and attitude and practice of health behavior.
Alcohol Drinking ; Breast Neoplasms ; Colorectal Neoplasms ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Early Detection of Cancer* ; Education ; Health Behavior ; Humans ; Liver Neoplasms ; Marital Status ; Mass Screening ; Smoke ; Smoking ; Stomach Neoplasms ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms

PURPOSE: The interest has been growing in the investigation and management of erectile dysfunction, but there is few report about prevalence of erectile dysfunction in Korea. The object of this study was to determine the prevalence of erectile dysfunction of men in rural region in Korea through a community based survey. Also, we investigated the relationship between risk factors and erectile dysfunction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 255 men aged 30 and over in chonnam province, Korea was randomly selected for determination of the prevalence of erectile dysfunction, and they participated in questionnaire survey including International Index of Erectile unction (IIEF), and clinical and laboratory examination that include blood pressure, ECG, blood glucose, urinalysis, serum level of lipid profiles, GOT, GPT and creatinine etc. Information on erectile dysfunction were collected by direct personal interview using IIEF. High risk factors of erectile dysfunction were divided according to estimated level and determined relationship with erectile dysfunction. RESULTS: Overall mean IIEF score was 20.6 7.3, and based on IIEF score, the prevalence of erectile dysfunction was 66.3% (169 of 255 men). The prevalence of erectile dysfunction of older aged men over 50 years was significantly higher than younger aged men. Also strong correlation was found between erectile dysfunction and diabetes mellitus, smoking. Although there was no statistical significance by multiple regression analysis, educational level, abnormal findings in ECG, history of chronic disease, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia and hyperlipidemia had relation to erectile dysfunction by ANOVA and Student t-test. And alcohol drinking, triglyceride and HDL-cholesterol were not statistically significant for development of erectile dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: Our data showed that the prevalence and correlations with risk factors of erectile dysfunction in local community. We hope that this study will aid in larger epidemiologic study and prevention of erectile dysfunction in whole land.
Alcohol Drinking ; Blood Glucose ; Blood Pressure ; Chronic Disease ; Creatinine ; Diabetes Mellitus ; Electrocardiography ; Epidemiologic Studies* ; Erectile Dysfunction* ; Hope ; Humans ; Hypercholesterolemia ; Hyperlipidemias ; Hypertension ; Jeollanam-do ; Korea ; Male* ; Prevalence ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Risk Factors* ; Smoke ; Smoking ; Triglycerides ; Urinalysis