1.Rejection Sensitivity: A Concept Analysis
Jihye SHIN ; Kuem Sun HAN ; Hyun Jeong SHIN
Journal of Korean Academy of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing 2024;33(3):253-261
Purpose:
This study conducted a concept analysis of rejection sensitivity using the Walker and Avant method, to clarify its defining attributes, antecedents, and consequences. So, this contributes to a deeper understanding of its role in interpersonal relationships.
Methods:
Walker and Avant’s framework, this concept analysis included a thorough literature review across multiple disciplines. The literature was extracted from databases such as PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, and RISS.
Results:
Rejection sensitivity is a psychological construct encompassing several attributes, including rejection expectation, perception of rejection, and reaction to perceived rejection. This trait is influenced by various antecedents, including early life experiences, attachment style, and cultural factors. The consequences or events associated with rejection sensitivity span multiple domains and can significantly affect an individual’s life.
Conclusion
According to interpersonal psychology and attachment theory, problem behavior in adolescents is a state of unsatisfied affection for parents and a response to feelings of unacceptance. Rejection sensitivity is particularly important in the Korean culture because of cultural factors.
2.Rejection Sensitivity: A Concept Analysis
Jihye SHIN ; Kuem Sun HAN ; Hyun Jeong SHIN
Journal of Korean Academy of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing 2024;33(3):253-261
Purpose:
This study conducted a concept analysis of rejection sensitivity using the Walker and Avant method, to clarify its defining attributes, antecedents, and consequences. So, this contributes to a deeper understanding of its role in interpersonal relationships.
Methods:
Walker and Avant’s framework, this concept analysis included a thorough literature review across multiple disciplines. The literature was extracted from databases such as PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, and RISS.
Results:
Rejection sensitivity is a psychological construct encompassing several attributes, including rejection expectation, perception of rejection, and reaction to perceived rejection. This trait is influenced by various antecedents, including early life experiences, attachment style, and cultural factors. The consequences or events associated with rejection sensitivity span multiple domains and can significantly affect an individual’s life.
Conclusion
According to interpersonal psychology and attachment theory, problem behavior in adolescents is a state of unsatisfied affection for parents and a response to feelings of unacceptance. Rejection sensitivity is particularly important in the Korean culture because of cultural factors.
3.Rejection Sensitivity: A Concept Analysis
Jihye SHIN ; Kuem Sun HAN ; Hyun Jeong SHIN
Journal of Korean Academy of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing 2024;33(3):253-261
Purpose:
This study conducted a concept analysis of rejection sensitivity using the Walker and Avant method, to clarify its defining attributes, antecedents, and consequences. So, this contributes to a deeper understanding of its role in interpersonal relationships.
Methods:
Walker and Avant’s framework, this concept analysis included a thorough literature review across multiple disciplines. The literature was extracted from databases such as PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, and RISS.
Results:
Rejection sensitivity is a psychological construct encompassing several attributes, including rejection expectation, perception of rejection, and reaction to perceived rejection. This trait is influenced by various antecedents, including early life experiences, attachment style, and cultural factors. The consequences or events associated with rejection sensitivity span multiple domains and can significantly affect an individual’s life.
Conclusion
According to interpersonal psychology and attachment theory, problem behavior in adolescents is a state of unsatisfied affection for parents and a response to feelings of unacceptance. Rejection sensitivity is particularly important in the Korean culture because of cultural factors.
4.Rejection Sensitivity: A Concept Analysis
Jihye SHIN ; Kuem Sun HAN ; Hyun Jeong SHIN
Journal of Korean Academy of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing 2024;33(3):253-261
Purpose:
This study conducted a concept analysis of rejection sensitivity using the Walker and Avant method, to clarify its defining attributes, antecedents, and consequences. So, this contributes to a deeper understanding of its role in interpersonal relationships.
Methods:
Walker and Avant’s framework, this concept analysis included a thorough literature review across multiple disciplines. The literature was extracted from databases such as PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, and RISS.
Results:
Rejection sensitivity is a psychological construct encompassing several attributes, including rejection expectation, perception of rejection, and reaction to perceived rejection. This trait is influenced by various antecedents, including early life experiences, attachment style, and cultural factors. The consequences or events associated with rejection sensitivity span multiple domains and can significantly affect an individual’s life.
Conclusion
According to interpersonal psychology and attachment theory, problem behavior in adolescents is a state of unsatisfied affection for parents and a response to feelings of unacceptance. Rejection sensitivity is particularly important in the Korean culture because of cultural factors.
5.2015 National Health Accounts and Current Health Expenditures in Korea.
Hyoung Sun JEONG ; Jeong Woo SHIN
Health Policy and Management 2017;27(3):199-210
BACKGROUND: This paper aims to demonstrate current health expenditure (CHE) and National Health Accounts of the years 2015 constructed according to the SHA2011, which is a new manual of System of Health Accounts (SHA) that was published jointly by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), Eurostat, and World Health Organization in 2011. Comparison is made with international trends by collecting and analysing health accounts of OECD member countries. Particularly, financing public- private mix is parsed in depth using SHA data of both HF as financing schemes as well as FS (financing source) as their revenue types. METHODS: Data sources such as Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service's publications of both motor insurance and drugs are newly used to construct the 2015 National Health Accounts. In the case of private financing, an estimation of total expenditures for revenues by provider groups is made from the Economic Census data; and the household income and expenditure survey, Korean healthcare panel study, etc. are used to allocate those totals into functional classifications. RESULTS: CHE was 115.2 trillion won in 2015, which accounts for 7.4 percent of Korea's gross domestic product. It was a big increase of 9.3 trillion won, 8.8 percent, from the previous year. Government and compulsory schemes's share (or public share) of 56.4% of the CHE in 2015 was much lower than the OECD average of 72.6%. ‘Transfers from government domestic revenue’ share of total revenue of HF was 17.8% in Korea, lower than the other contribution-based countries. When it comes to ‘compulsory contributory health financing schemes,’‘Transfers from government domestic revenue’ share of 14.9% was again much lower compared to Japan (44.7%) and Belgium (34.8%) as contribution-based countries. CONCLUSION: Considering relatively lower public financing share in the inpatient care as well as overall low public financing share of total CHE, priorities in health insurance coverage need to be repositioned among inpatient care, outpatient care and drugs.
Ambulatory Care
;
Belgium
;
Censuses
;
Classification
;
Delivery of Health Care
;
Family Characteristics
;
Financing, Government
;
Gross Domestic Product
;
Health Expenditures*
;
Healthcare Financing
;
Humans
;
Information Storage and Retrieval
;
Inpatients
;
Insurance
;
Insurance, Health
;
Japan
;
Korea*
;
Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development
;
World Health Organization
6.2015 National Health Accounts and Current Health Expenditures in Korea.
Hyoung Sun JEONG ; Jeong Woo SHIN
Health Policy and Management 2017;27(3):199-210
BACKGROUND: This paper aims to demonstrate current health expenditure (CHE) and National Health Accounts of the years 2015 constructed according to the SHA2011, which is a new manual of System of Health Accounts (SHA) that was published jointly by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), Eurostat, and World Health Organization in 2011. Comparison is made with international trends by collecting and analysing health accounts of OECD member countries. Particularly, financing public- private mix is parsed in depth using SHA data of both HF as financing schemes as well as FS (financing source) as their revenue types. METHODS: Data sources such as Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service's publications of both motor insurance and drugs are newly used to construct the 2015 National Health Accounts. In the case of private financing, an estimation of total expenditures for revenues by provider groups is made from the Economic Census data; and the household income and expenditure survey, Korean healthcare panel study, etc. are used to allocate those totals into functional classifications. RESULTS: CHE was 115.2 trillion won in 2015, which accounts for 7.4 percent of Korea's gross domestic product. It was a big increase of 9.3 trillion won, 8.8 percent, from the previous year. Government and compulsory schemes's share (or public share) of 56.4% of the CHE in 2015 was much lower than the OECD average of 72.6%. ‘Transfers from government domestic revenue’ share of total revenue of HF was 17.8% in Korea, lower than the other contribution-based countries. When it comes to ‘compulsory contributory health financing schemes,’‘Transfers from government domestic revenue’ share of 14.9% was again much lower compared to Japan (44.7%) and Belgium (34.8%) as contribution-based countries. CONCLUSION: Considering relatively lower public financing share in the inpatient care as well as overall low public financing share of total CHE, priorities in health insurance coverage need to be repositioned among inpatient care, outpatient care and drugs.
Ambulatory Care
;
Belgium
;
Censuses
;
Classification
;
Delivery of Health Care
;
Family Characteristics
;
Financing, Government
;
Gross Domestic Product
;
Health Expenditures*
;
Healthcare Financing
;
Humans
;
Information Storage and Retrieval
;
Inpatients
;
Insurance
;
Insurance, Health
;
Japan
;
Korea*
;
Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development
;
World Health Organization
7.1970-2014 Current Health Expenditures and National Health Accounts in Korea: Application of SHA2011.
Hyoung Sun JEONG ; Jeong Woo SHIN
Health Policy and Management 2016;26(2):95-106
A new manual of System of Health Accounts (SHA) 2011, was published jointly by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), Eurostat, and World Health Organization in 2011. This offers more complete coverage than the previous version, SHA 1.0, within the functional classification in areas such as prevention and a precise approach for tracking financing in the health care sector using the new classification of financing schemes. This paper aims to demonstrate current health expenditure (CHE) and National Health Accounts of the years 1970-2014 constructed according to the SHA2011. Data sources for public financing include budget and settlement documents of the government, various statistics from the National Health Insurance, and others. In the case of private financing, an estimation of total revenue by provider groups is made from the Economic Census data and the household income and expenditure survey, Korean healthcare panel study, etc. are used to allocate those totals into functional classifications. CHE was 105 trillion won in 2014, which accounts for 7.1% of Korea's gross domestic product. It was a big increase of 7.7 trillion won, 7.9%, from the previous year. Public share (government and compulsory schemes) accounting for 56.5% of the CHE in 2014 was still much lower than the OECD average of about 73%. With these estimates, it is possible to compare health expenditures of Korea and other countries better. Awareness and appreciation of the need and gains from applying SHA2011 for the health expenditure classification are expected to increase as OECD health expenditure figures get more frequently quoted among health policy makers.
Budgets
;
Censuses
;
Classification
;
Delivery of Health Care
;
Family Characteristics
;
Financing, Government
;
Gross Domestic Product
;
Health Care Sector
;
Health Expenditures*
;
Health Policy
;
Information Storage and Retrieval
;
Korea*
;
National Health Programs
;
Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development
;
World Health Organization
8.A Case of Lactobezoar After Operation for Ileal Atresia.
Ock Seung JEONG ; Ai Sunn CHOY ; Mi Sun KIM ; Toung Shin KWARK ; Jeong Woo YANG
Journal of the Korean Pediatric Society 1981;24(4):407-409
No abstract available.
9.A Case of Periocular Allergic Contact Dermatitis from Latanoprost Misdiagnosed as Cellulitis.
Jeong Won JO ; Yun Sun MOON ; Hae Bong JEONG ; Young Bin SHIN ; Chi Yeon KIM
Korean Journal of Dermatology 2018;56(3):214-215
No abstract available.
Cellulitis*
;
Dermatitis, Allergic Contact*
10.Trends in Scale and Structure of Korea's Health Expenditure over Last Three Decades (1980-2009): Financing, Functions and Providers.
Hyoung Sun JEONG ; Jeong Woo SHIN
Journal of Korean Medical Science 2012;27(Suppl):S13-S20
This paper introduces statistics related to the size and composition of Korea's total health expenditure. The figures produced were tailored to the OECD's system of health accounts. Korea's total health expenditure in 2009 was estimated at 73.7 trillion won (US$ 57.7 billion). The annual per capita health expenditure was equivalent to US$ PPP 1,879. Korea's total health expenditure as a share of gross domestic product was 6.9% in 2009, far below the OECD average of 9.5%. Korea's public financing share of total health expenditure increased rapidly from less than 50% before 2000 to 58.2% in 2009. However, despite this growth, Korea's share remained the fourth lowest among OECD countries that had an average public share of 71.5%. Inpatient, outpatient, and pharmaceutical care accounted for 32.1%, 33.0%, and 23.7% of current health expenditure in 2009, respectively. A total of 41.1% of current health expenditure went to hospitals, 28.1% to providers of ambulatory healthcare (15.9% on doctor's clinics), and 17.9% to pharmacies. More investment in the translation of national health account data into policy-relevant information is suggested for future progress.
Delivery of Health Care/economics/*trends
;
Health Expenditures/statistics & numerical data/*trends
;
Humans
;
Republic of Korea