PURPOSE: To analyze the structure of Korean nurse labor market and examine its effect on hospital nurse staffing. METHODS: Secondary data were obtained from Statistics Korea, Education Statistics, and Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service and Patient Survey. Intensity of monopsony in the nurse labor market was measured by Herfindahl Hirshman Index (HHI). Hospital nurse staffing level was divided into high and low. While controlling for confounding factors such as inpatient days and severity mix of patients, effects of characteristics of nurse labor markets on nurse staffing levels were examined using multi-level logistic regressions. RESULTS: For characteristics of nurse labor markets, metropolitan areas had high intensity of monopsony, while the capital area had competitive labor market and the unemployed nurse rate was higher than other areas. Among hospital characteristics, bed occupancy rate was significantly associated with nurse staffing levels. Among characteristics of nurse labor markets, the effect of HHI was indeterminable. CONCLUSION: The Korean nurse labor market has different structure between the capital and other metropolitan areas. But the effect of the structure of nurse labor market on nurse staffing levels is indeterminable. Characteristics such as occupancy rate and number of beds are significantly associated with nurse staffing levels. Further study in support of the effect of nurse labor market is needed.
Hospitals ; Humans ; Logistic Models ; Nursing Staff, Hospital/economics/*supply & distribution ; Workplace

PURPOSE: Management of the metabolic risk factors in diabetes patients is essential for preventing or delaying diabetic complications. This study compared the levels of the metabolic risk factors in diabetes patients according to the income levels, and examined the secular trends in recent decades. METHODS: The data from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1998 ~ 2014 were used. The diabetes patients were divided into three groups based on their household income levels. General information was obtained through self-administered questionnaires, and the blood biomarkers and blood pressure data were obtained from a health examination. Multivariable linear regression models were used to compare the metabolic biomarker levels according to the household income levels, adjusting for potential confounding factors. RESULTS: The fasting blood glucose, hemoglobin A1c, and blood lipid (total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, and triglyceride) levels were similar in the three groups. During the survey period of 16 years, the blood pressure showed a significant decreasing trend with time in all groups (p < 0.001). In contrast, the fasting blood glucose (p = 0.004), total cholesterol (p < 0.001), and LDL-cholesterol levels (p = 0.007) decreased significantly, and the HDL-cholesterol level (p < 0.001) increased significantly in the highest-income groups. In the lowest-income group, the fasting blood glucose (p = 0.02), total cholesterol (p < 0.001), and triglyceride (p = 0.003) levels showed a significant decreasing trend over time. On the other hand, the middle-income group showed no significant change in any of the metabolic risk factors except for blood pressure. CONCLUSION: The level of management of metabolic risk factors according to the income level of Korean diabetes patients was similar. On the other hand, the highest- and lowest-income groups showed positive trends of management of these factors during 16 years of observation, whereas the middle-income group did not show any improvement.
Biomarkers ; Blood Glucose ; Blood Pressure ; Cholesterol ; Diabetes Complications ; Diabetes Mellitus ; Family Characteristics ; Fasting ; Hand ; Humans ; Korea ; Linear Models ; Lipoproteins ; Nutrition Surveys ; Risk Factors ; Triglycerides

Purpose: This study aimed to synthesize qualitative research findings on factors influencing medication adherence in individuals with schizophrenia. Methods: This study used the qualitative meta-synthesis method proposed by Thomas and Harden to categorize results based on the ecological model. A systematic literature review of nine databases, including international (CINAHL, PubMed, and Web of Science) and domestic (DBpia, KCI, KISS, KoreaMed, RISS, and ScienceON) databases, was conducted from November 5 to December 4, 2024 to identify qualitative studies on medication adherence among South Korean adults aged 19 years or older who were diagnosed with schizophrenia. Results: Three studies on medication adherence in individuals with schizophrenia identified five key themes within the ecological model, encompassing both barriers and facilitators. These themes emerged across different factors, including intrapersonal (barriers: lack of insight and perceived burden of taking psychiatric medication; facilitators: acceptance of medication as treatment), interpersonal (facilitators: supportive systems), and community factors (barriers: stigma related to the use of psychiatric medication). Conclusion These findings highlight the need for a comprehensive, multifactor approach to improving medication adherence in individuals with schizophrenia. This study also provides foundational data for the development of targeted interventions to enhance treatment adherence in these individuals.

Purpose: This study aimed to synthesize qualitative research findings on factors influencing medication adherence in individuals with schizophrenia. Methods: This study used the qualitative meta-synthesis method proposed by Thomas and Harden to categorize results based on the ecological model. A systematic literature review of nine databases, including international (CINAHL, PubMed, and Web of Science) and domestic (DBpia, KCI, KISS, KoreaMed, RISS, and ScienceON) databases, was conducted from November 5 to December 4, 2024 to identify qualitative studies on medication adherence among South Korean adults aged 19 years or older who were diagnosed with schizophrenia. Results: Three studies on medication adherence in individuals with schizophrenia identified five key themes within the ecological model, encompassing both barriers and facilitators. These themes emerged across different factors, including intrapersonal (barriers: lack of insight and perceived burden of taking psychiatric medication; facilitators: acceptance of medication as treatment), interpersonal (facilitators: supportive systems), and community factors (barriers: stigma related to the use of psychiatric medication). Conclusion These findings highlight the need for a comprehensive, multifactor approach to improving medication adherence in individuals with schizophrenia. This study also provides foundational data for the development of targeted interventions to enhance treatment adherence in these individuals.

Purpose: This study aimed to synthesize qualitative research findings on factors influencing medication adherence in individuals with schizophrenia. Methods: This study used the qualitative meta-synthesis method proposed by Thomas and Harden to categorize results based on the ecological model. A systematic literature review of nine databases, including international (CINAHL, PubMed, and Web of Science) and domestic (DBpia, KCI, KISS, KoreaMed, RISS, and ScienceON) databases, was conducted from November 5 to December 4, 2024 to identify qualitative studies on medication adherence among South Korean adults aged 19 years or older who were diagnosed with schizophrenia. Results: Three studies on medication adherence in individuals with schizophrenia identified five key themes within the ecological model, encompassing both barriers and facilitators. These themes emerged across different factors, including intrapersonal (barriers: lack of insight and perceived burden of taking psychiatric medication; facilitators: acceptance of medication as treatment), interpersonal (facilitators: supportive systems), and community factors (barriers: stigma related to the use of psychiatric medication). Conclusion These findings highlight the need for a comprehensive, multifactor approach to improving medication adherence in individuals with schizophrenia. This study also provides foundational data for the development of targeted interventions to enhance treatment adherence in these individuals.

Purpose: This study aimed to synthesize qualitative research findings on factors influencing medication adherence in individuals with schizophrenia. Methods: This study used the qualitative meta-synthesis method proposed by Thomas and Harden to categorize results based on the ecological model. A systematic literature review of nine databases, including international (CINAHL, PubMed, and Web of Science) and domestic (DBpia, KCI, KISS, KoreaMed, RISS, and ScienceON) databases, was conducted from November 5 to December 4, 2024 to identify qualitative studies on medication adherence among South Korean adults aged 19 years or older who were diagnosed with schizophrenia. Results: Three studies on medication adherence in individuals with schizophrenia identified five key themes within the ecological model, encompassing both barriers and facilitators. These themes emerged across different factors, including intrapersonal (barriers: lack of insight and perceived burden of taking psychiatric medication; facilitators: acceptance of medication as treatment), interpersonal (facilitators: supportive systems), and community factors (barriers: stigma related to the use of psychiatric medication). Conclusion These findings highlight the need for a comprehensive, multifactor approach to improving medication adherence in individuals with schizophrenia. This study also provides foundational data for the development of targeted interventions to enhance treatment adherence in these individuals.

Purpose: The COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) pandemic led to significant changes in clinical clerkships, including reduced ward rounds. We aimed to determine how the pandemic–induced changes in the clinical practice environment affect the clinical performance of medical students. Methods: We analyzed objective structured clinical examination scores of third- and fourth-year medical students from 2019–2020 and 2020–2021 across six stations by the Seoul–Gyeonggi Consortium. Clinical, communication, and ability scores were measured and analyzed using repeated-measures multivariate analysis of variance. Results: The interaction between clinical practice progress and pandemic-induced changes significantly affected physical examination and medical history scores, though the differences were not substantial. Patient-physician interaction significance varied by measurement period. Clinical communication ability also showed significant differences based on the measurement period and practical experience. Conclusion During the pandemic, alternative learning methods, including self–learning, simulation/practice, and peer role–play, helped improve medical competency in areas such as history–taking and physical examination. However, these were less effective in improving patient–physician interactions or clinical communication efficacy. Alternative learning methods have limitations, and they cannot replace direct patient encounters in clinical practice.

Purpose: The COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) pandemic led to significant changes in clinical clerkships, including reduced ward rounds. We aimed to determine how the pandemic–induced changes in the clinical practice environment affect the clinical performance of medical students. Methods: We analyzed objective structured clinical examination scores of third- and fourth-year medical students from 2019–2020 and 2020–2021 across six stations by the Seoul–Gyeonggi Consortium. Clinical, communication, and ability scores were measured and analyzed using repeated-measures multivariate analysis of variance. Results: The interaction between clinical practice progress and pandemic-induced changes significantly affected physical examination and medical history scores, though the differences were not substantial. Patient-physician interaction significance varied by measurement period. Clinical communication ability also showed significant differences based on the measurement period and practical experience. Conclusion During the pandemic, alternative learning methods, including self–learning, simulation/practice, and peer role–play, helped improve medical competency in areas such as history–taking and physical examination. However, these were less effective in improving patient–physician interactions or clinical communication efficacy. Alternative learning methods have limitations, and they cannot replace direct patient encounters in clinical practice.

Purpose: The COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) pandemic led to significant changes in clinical clerkships, including reduced ward rounds. We aimed to determine how the pandemic–induced changes in the clinical practice environment affect the clinical performance of medical students. Methods: We analyzed objective structured clinical examination scores of third- and fourth-year medical students from 2019–2020 and 2020–2021 across six stations by the Seoul–Gyeonggi Consortium. Clinical, communication, and ability scores were measured and analyzed using repeated-measures multivariate analysis of variance. Results: The interaction between clinical practice progress and pandemic-induced changes significantly affected physical examination and medical history scores, though the differences were not substantial. Patient-physician interaction significance varied by measurement period. Clinical communication ability also showed significant differences based on the measurement period and practical experience. Conclusion During the pandemic, alternative learning methods, including self–learning, simulation/practice, and peer role–play, helped improve medical competency in areas such as history–taking and physical examination. However, these were less effective in improving patient–physician interactions or clinical communication efficacy. Alternative learning methods have limitations, and they cannot replace direct patient encounters in clinical practice.

Purpose: The COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) pandemic led to significant changes in clinical clerkships, including reduced ward rounds. We aimed to determine how the pandemic–induced changes in the clinical practice environment affect the clinical performance of medical students. Methods: We analyzed objective structured clinical examination scores of third- and fourth-year medical students from 2019–2020 and 2020–2021 across six stations by the Seoul–Gyeonggi Consortium. Clinical, communication, and ability scores were measured and analyzed using repeated-measures multivariate analysis of variance. Results: The interaction between clinical practice progress and pandemic-induced changes significantly affected physical examination and medical history scores, though the differences were not substantial. Patient-physician interaction significance varied by measurement period. Clinical communication ability also showed significant differences based on the measurement period and practical experience. Conclusion During the pandemic, alternative learning methods, including self–learning, simulation/practice, and peer role–play, helped improve medical competency in areas such as history–taking and physical examination. However, these were less effective in improving patient–physician interactions or clinical communication efficacy. Alternative learning methods have limitations, and they cannot replace direct patient encounters in clinical practice.