No abstract available.
Cause of Death* ; Kidney Transplantation* ; Kidney*

PURPOSE: Acute renal failure (ARF) is one of the common complications after liver transplantation (LT) and could be fatal unless promptly treated. Identification of risk factors is needed to prevent ARF and to attenuate the unfavorable outcomes of ARF after LT. The aim of this study was to analyze risk factors for development of postoperative ARF (between day 0 and day 30 after LT). METHODS: Total 72 LTs were performed between 1996 and 2005. Sixty six patients' records, excluding 6 patients with preoperative serum creatinine level more than 2.5 mg/dl, were reviewed retrospectively for preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative variables to compare patients presenting ARF with the remaining patients. RESULTS: Postoperative ARF occurred in 36 transplants (54.5%) after LT. Preoperative serum sodium, bilirubin and BUN, creatinine level were higher in ARF group. ARF group had more child-pugh class C, and more episodes of preoperative hepatic encephalopathy. During intraoperative period, anhepatic time was longer and total doses of intraoperative furosemide was larger in ARF group. Also, postoperative blood immunosuppressant level was higher, and postoperative episodes of bleeding and hypotension were more common in ARF group. In multivariate analysis, preoperative child-pugh class C (P=0.041), preoperative serum creatinine level (> or =1.0 mg/dL, P=0.032), and postoperative episodes of hypotension and bleeding (P=0.045, P=0.03 respectively) were identified as risk factors for postoperative ARF. CONCLUSION: This study showed that preoperative renal and liver function, and postoperative hemodynamic condition were independent risk factors for development of ARF after LT.
Acute Kidney Injury* ; Bilirubin ; Creatinine ; Furosemide ; Hemodynamics ; Hemorrhage ; Hepatic Encephalopathy ; Humans ; Hypotension ; Intraoperative Period ; Liver Transplantation* ; Liver* ; Multivariate Analysis ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors* ; Sodium

There are few reports of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) in the esophagus. The authors report a patient with an esophageal GIST that was found incidentally during an endoscopy. The endoscopy revealed a 1 cm sized mass with a granular surface at the 32 cm site from the upper incisor. Endoscopic ultrasonography revealed the tumor to be located in the muscularis mucosa of the esophageal wall. Histologically, the tumor consisted of spindle cells, with no mitotic index, that were immunoreactive for KIT and S-100. The tumor was diagnosed as a gastrointestinal stromal tumor with neural differentiation (GINT). An endoscopic mucosal resection was performed and the patient has been on routine follow up at the out patient department for three months.
Endoscopy ; Endosonography ; Esophagus ; Follow-Up Studies ; Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors* ; Humans ; Incisor ; Mitotic Index ; Mucous Membrane

Objective: To investigate the agreement and reliability of estimating the volumes and normative percentiles (N%) of segmented brain regions among NeuroQuant (NQ), DeepBrain (DB), and FreeSurfer (FS) software programs, focusing on the comparison between NQ and DB. Materials and Methods: Three-dimensional T1-weighted images of 145 participants (48 healthy participants, 50 patients with mild cognitive impairment, and 47 patients with Alzheimer’s disease) from a single medical center (SMC) dataset and 130 participants from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) dataset were included in this retrospective study. All images were analyzed with DB, NQ, and FS software to obtain volume estimates and N% of various segmented brain regions. We used Bland–Altman analysis, repeated measures ANOVA, reproducibility coefficient, effect size, and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) to evaluate inter-method agreement and reliability. Results: Among the three software programs, the Bland–Altman plot showed a substantial bias, the ICC showed a broad range of reliability (0.004–0.97), and repeated-measures ANOVA revealed significant mean volume differences in all brain regions.Similarly, the volume differences of the three software programs had large effect sizes in most regions (0.73–5.51). The effect size was largest in the pallidum in both datasets and smallest in the thalamus and cerebral white matter in the SMC and ADNI datasets, respectively. N% of NQ and DB showed an unacceptably broad Bland–Altman limit of agreement in all brain regions and a very wide range of ICC values (-0.142–0.844) in most brain regions. Conclusion NQ and DB showed significant differences in the measured volume and N%, with limited agreement and reliability for most brain regions. Therefore, users should be aware of the lack of interchangeability between these software programs when they are applied in clinical practice.

We experienced a case of aneurysm of the sinus of Valsalva dissecting into the ventricular dseptum. This dissection was induced by paravalvular leakage after aortic and mitral valve replacement. This 37-year-old male was admitted via emergency room due to progressive dyspnea. He had undergone aortic valve replacement(carbomedic(R) 23 mm) and mitral valve replacement(carbomedic(R) 31 mm) due to aortic regurgitation and mitral regurgitation about 6 years prior to admission and followed up regularly. The diagnosis was made by transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography and reconfirmed by root aortography. The inlet of the ventricular septal aneurysmal sac was repaired by one layer suture with 3-0 prolene of the endocardium, epicardium and homograft muscle shoulder altogether. Postoperative course was uneventful and the patient was discharged on the 11th postoperative day.
Adult ; Allografts ; Aneurysm* ; Aortic Valve ; Aortic Valve Insufficiency ; Aortography ; Bays ; Diagnosis ; Dyspnea ; Echocardiography, Transesophageal ; Emergency Service, Hospital ; Endocardium ; Humans ; Male ; Mitral Valve ; Mitral Valve Insufficiency ; Pericardium ; Polypropylenes ; Shoulder ; Sinus of Valsalva* ; Sutures ; Ventricular Septum*

PURPOSE: It is well-known that kidney transplantation cannot be done if recipient has circulating antibodies showing positive lymphocyte cross-match (LCX) to organ donor. In the United States and European countries, the incidence of positive LCX to cadaveric donors in patients who are on the waiting list is up to 20~40%. Unfortunately, these patients also show high rate of positive LCX to live donors when they have donor candidates in their family members and have to be on dialysis until compatible donor comes up. Recently, Eugene J Schweitzer and his associates at the University of Maryland used the combination therapy with plasmapheresis, intravenous gamma globulin and potent immunosuppression to induce negative conversion of LCX in patients who were LCX positive to their living donors and reported the good results after the trial. We did the combination therapy in patients who had positive LCX to their living donors and reported the results. METHODS: Seven patients, four women and three men who showed positive LCX to their living donors, underwent the conversion trials between January 1 and July 31, 2002. The mean age of patients was 43.86 (35~60) and the duration of dialyses varies from 9 to 120 months. We used combination therapy with plasmapheresis, intravenous gamma globulin injection, tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and steroids. Plasmapheresis had been done on every other day up to 6 times to induce negative conversion of LCX. If patient continue to show positive LCX to donor after 6 times of plasmapheresis, we stopped the therapy. The numbers of plasmapheresis varies from two to six times. Kidney transplantations were preformed immediately after negative conversion of LCX as a semi-elective procedures. Five to ten day courses of ATG (or OKT3) were used as an induction immunosuppression after transplantation and tacrolimus, MMF, and steroids were used as a maintenance immunosuppression. RESULTS: We could achieve negative conversion of LCX in six out of seven patients, and kidney transplantations were performed in these 6 patients successfully. There was no hyperacute rejection during the operations, but three patients developed acute rejection episodes during their early postoperative periods. Steroid pulse therapies were used as a primary therapy to treat acute rejection and all three patients showed complete recovery of their graft function after the treatments. Baseline serum creatinine level varies from 1.0 mg/dl to 1.9 mg/dl with 3 to 6 months follow-up periods after transplantations. We could not induce negative conversion in one patient and he remained on hemodialysis. CONCLUSION: We did successful kidney transplantations in six patients who achieved negative conversion of LCX to their donors after the combination therapy with plasmapheresis and potent immunosuppression. All patients showed excellent graft function since their operations and did not have any significant complications except three reversible acute rejection episodes. According to the results, although it is preliminary, we recommend the use of the combination therapy in patient who has LCX positive living donor. Further long-term study with more numbers of patients is needed for the evaluation of the efficacy of this trial.
Antibodies ; Cadaver ; Creatinine ; Dialysis ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; gamma-Globulins* ; Humans ; Immunosuppression ; Incidence ; Kidney Transplantation* ; Living Donors ; Lymphocytes* ; Male ; Maryland ; Plasmapheresis* ; Postoperative Period ; Renal Dialysis ; Steroids ; Tacrolimus ; Tissue Donors ; Transplants ; United States ; Waiting Lists