Blood cancers, including leukemia, multiple myeloma, and lymphoma, pose significant challenges owing to their heterogeneous nature and the limitations of traditional treatments. Precision medicine has emerged as a transformative approach that offers tailored therapeutic strategies based on individual patient profiles. Ex vivo drug sensitivity analysis is central to this advancement, which enables testing of patient-derived cancer cells against a panel of therapeutic agents to predict clinical responses. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the latest advancements in ex vivo drug sensitivity analyses and their application in blood cancers. We discuss the development of more comprehensive drug response metrics and the evaluation of drug combinations to identify synergistic interactions.Additionally, we present evaluation of the advanced therapeutics such as antibody–drug conjugates using ex vivo assays. This review describes the critical role of ex vivo drug sensitivity analyses in advancing precision medicine by examining technological innovations and clinical applications. Ultimately, these innovations are paving the way for more effective and individualized treatments, improving patient outcomes, and establishing new standards for the management of blood cancers.

Blood cancers, including leukemia, multiple myeloma, and lymphoma, pose significant challenges owing to their heterogeneous nature and the limitations of traditional treatments. Precision medicine has emerged as a transformative approach that offers tailored therapeutic strategies based on individual patient profiles. Ex vivo drug sensitivity analysis is central to this advancement, which enables testing of patient-derived cancer cells against a panel of therapeutic agents to predict clinical responses. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the latest advancements in ex vivo drug sensitivity analyses and their application in blood cancers. We discuss the development of more comprehensive drug response metrics and the evaluation of drug combinations to identify synergistic interactions.Additionally, we present evaluation of the advanced therapeutics such as antibody–drug conjugates using ex vivo assays. This review describes the critical role of ex vivo drug sensitivity analyses in advancing precision medicine by examining technological innovations and clinical applications. Ultimately, these innovations are paving the way for more effective and individualized treatments, improving patient outcomes, and establishing new standards for the management of blood cancers.

Blood cancers, including leukemia, multiple myeloma, and lymphoma, pose significant challenges owing to their heterogeneous nature and the limitations of traditional treatments. Precision medicine has emerged as a transformative approach that offers tailored therapeutic strategies based on individual patient profiles. Ex vivo drug sensitivity analysis is central to this advancement, which enables testing of patient-derived cancer cells against a panel of therapeutic agents to predict clinical responses. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the latest advancements in ex vivo drug sensitivity analyses and their application in blood cancers. We discuss the development of more comprehensive drug response metrics and the evaluation of drug combinations to identify synergistic interactions.Additionally, we present evaluation of the advanced therapeutics such as antibody–drug conjugates using ex vivo assays. This review describes the critical role of ex vivo drug sensitivity analyses in advancing precision medicine by examining technological innovations and clinical applications. Ultimately, these innovations are paving the way for more effective and individualized treatments, improving patient outcomes, and establishing new standards for the management of blood cancers.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the characteristics of patients with failed initial Kasai portoenterostomy (KP) and to compare the long-term prognosis of redo-KP with that of liver transplantation (LT) in these patients. Methods: The medical records of patients with biliary atresia (BA) who failed initial KP from 2010 to 2021 at a single center were retrospectively analyzed. KP failure was defined as persistent jaundice (total bilirubin concentration, ≥2.0 mg/dL) after KP or the performance of LT. Results: During the study period, 32 patients experienced initial KP failure, with 10 undergoing redo-KP and 22 undergoing LT. Redo-KP was successful in a minority of patients with failed initial KP, but the complications, particularly cholangitis, were more frequent in the redo-KP group. The long-term prognosis of redo-KP compared to LT showed that while some patients benefited from native liver survival after redo-KP, LT remains the more definitive solution for sustained liver function and survival in patients with BA. Conclusion The only factor differing significantly between patients who underwent redo-KP and LT after failed initial KP was complications of cholangitis. Redo-KP was successful in 4 of 10 patients with failed initial KP, suggesting that redo-KP may be a treatment option in patients with BA and failed initial KP.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the characteristics of patients with failed initial Kasai portoenterostomy (KP) and to compare the long-term prognosis of redo-KP with that of liver transplantation (LT) in these patients. Methods: The medical records of patients with biliary atresia (BA) who failed initial KP from 2010 to 2021 at a single center were retrospectively analyzed. KP failure was defined as persistent jaundice (total bilirubin concentration, ≥2.0 mg/dL) after KP or the performance of LT. Results: During the study period, 32 patients experienced initial KP failure, with 10 undergoing redo-KP and 22 undergoing LT. Redo-KP was successful in a minority of patients with failed initial KP, but the complications, particularly cholangitis, were more frequent in the redo-KP group. The long-term prognosis of redo-KP compared to LT showed that while some patients benefited from native liver survival after redo-KP, LT remains the more definitive solution for sustained liver function and survival in patients with BA. Conclusion The only factor differing significantly between patients who underwent redo-KP and LT after failed initial KP was complications of cholangitis. Redo-KP was successful in 4 of 10 patients with failed initial KP, suggesting that redo-KP may be a treatment option in patients with BA and failed initial KP.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the characteristics of patients with failed initial Kasai portoenterostomy (KP) and to compare the long-term prognosis of redo-KP with that of liver transplantation (LT) in these patients. Methods: The medical records of patients with biliary atresia (BA) who failed initial KP from 2010 to 2021 at a single center were retrospectively analyzed. KP failure was defined as persistent jaundice (total bilirubin concentration, ≥2.0 mg/dL) after KP or the performance of LT. Results: During the study period, 32 patients experienced initial KP failure, with 10 undergoing redo-KP and 22 undergoing LT. Redo-KP was successful in a minority of patients with failed initial KP, but the complications, particularly cholangitis, were more frequent in the redo-KP group. The long-term prognosis of redo-KP compared to LT showed that while some patients benefited from native liver survival after redo-KP, LT remains the more definitive solution for sustained liver function and survival in patients with BA. Conclusion The only factor differing significantly between patients who underwent redo-KP and LT after failed initial KP was complications of cholangitis. Redo-KP was successful in 4 of 10 patients with failed initial KP, suggesting that redo-KP may be a treatment option in patients with BA and failed initial KP.