Objective:To investigate the deep venous thrombosis in ICU,including its morbidity rate,causes,monitoring,therapy and prognosis.Methods:A clinical retrospective analysis was carried out to investigate 32 patients with deep venous thrombosis in ICU.Re- sults:The morbidity of deep venous thrombosis in ICU was 4.7 percent(32/681),and the top three causes were severe acute pancreatitis (46.9 percent,15/32),multiple injurie(s28.1percent,9/32),hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage(12.5 percent,4/32)in the investigated 32 cases.Factors significantly inducing deep venous thrombosis were deep venous catheter or bedridden or blood hypercoagulability.30 patients,accounting for 93.8 percen(t30/32)were cured after the treatment of lifting sickness limbs,and anticoagulation and thrombolysis 7 to 14 days.Only one patient was complicated by pulmonary embolism,but no one died.Conclusion:Deep venous thrombosis occurred for multiple causes.The serious patients in ICU were highly dangerous for it.We should pay attention to the high-risk people to avoid vascular complications.The d-dimmer detection,platelet count and deep venous color Doppler inspection were the effective ways to monitor it.The key to cure deep venous thrombosis was early finding and early treatment with anticoagulation and thrombolysis.

Objective:To investigate the effect of everting resection natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) on postoperative function in patients with colorectal cancer.Methods:The clinical data of 78 patients with colorectal cancer treated in Chongqing Bishan District People's Hospital from June 2019 to June 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the selected surgical methods, they were divided into the study group (45 cases) and the control group (33 cases). The control group underwent traditional laparoscopic radical resection of colorectal cancer, and the study group underwent everting resection NOSES. Perioperative indicators such as intraoperative bleeding, operation time, postoperative exhaust time and hospitalization time were observed in the two groups. Anal function indicators [anal constriction pressure, fecal incontinence severity score (Wexner score)], coagulation function indicators [activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), prothrombin time (PT)], the levels of inflammatory factors [interleukin-6 (IL-6), C-reactive protein (CRP)] and pain factors [nerve growth factor (NGF), prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), neuropeptide Y (NPY)] before and after operation were compared between the two groups.Results:There were no significant differences in intraoperative bleeding and operation time between the two groups ( t values were 1.30 and 0.56, both P > 0.05); the postoperative exhaust time and hospitalization time of the study group were shorter than those of the control group ( t values were 26.88 and 7.42, both P < 0.05). At 3 months after operation, the anal constriction pressure in the two groups was lower than that before operation [study group: (177±10) mmHg (1 mmHg = 0.133 kPa) vs. (184±10) mmHg, t = 3.22, P < 0.001; control group: (178±10) mmHg vs. (184±10) mmHg, t = 2.36, P = 0.020]; the Wexner score was higher than that before operation [study group: (9.0±1.2) points vs. (7.9±1.2) points, t = 4.26, P < 0.001; control group: (10.3±1.2) points vs. (7.9±1.2) points, t = 7.80, P < 0.001], and the Wexner score in the study group was lower than that in the control group ( t = 4.57, P < 0.001). At 1 day after operation, APTT and PT in the two groups were shorter than those before operation (all P < 0.05), and APTT and PT in the study group were shorter than those in the control group [APTT: (26.2±2.2) s vs. (28.3±2.2) s, t = 4.23, P < 0.001; PT: (9.34±0.17) s vs.(11.03±0.41) s, t = 24.93, P < 0.001]. At 1 day after operation, the levels of IL-6 and CRP in the two groups were higher than those before operation (all P < 0.05); the levels of IL-6 and CRP in the study group were lower than those in the control group [IL-6: (8.6± 2.2) ng/L vs. (17.2±3.1) ng/L, t = 14.26, P < 0.001; CRP: (2.16±0.22) mg/L vs. (2.99±0.24) mg/L, t = 15.84, P < 0.001]. At 1 day after operation, the levels of NGF, PGE2 and NPY in the two groups were higher than those before operation (all P < 0.05), and the levels of NGF, PGE2 and NPY in the study group were lower than those in the control group [NGF: (302±7) pg/ml vs. (319±8) pg/ml, t = 9.76, P < 0.001; PGE2: (189±4) ng/L vs. (196±5) ng/L, t = 6.56, P < 0.001; NPY: (164±10) ng/L vs. (177±11) ng/L, t = 5.36, P < 0.001]. Conclusions:Everting resection NOSES can effectively shorten the postoperative exhaust time and hospitalization time of patients with colorectal cancer, have less impact on coagulation function and anal function, reduce the inflammatory reaction and the level of pain factors.

Objective:To compare the efficacy and prognosis between fluorescent laparoscopic and conventional laparoscopic radical resection of colorectal cancer.Methods:A total of 114 colorectal cancer patients in Bishan District People's Hospital of Chongqing from June 2019 to January 2021 were selected as the research objects, and they were divided into two groups according to the diagnosis and treatment time. Forty-four patients receiving treatment from June 2019 to February 2020 were enrolled as group A, and 70 patients receiving treatment from March 2020 to January 2021 were set as group B. Patients in group A received fluorescent laparoscopic radical resection of colorectal cancer, and patients in group B received conventional laparoscopic radical resection of colorectal cancer. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, metastatic lymph node clearance rate, clinical efficacy (the overall response rate was calculated as complete remission + partial remission), postoperative complication rate and recurrence rate within 1 year were compared between the two groups.Results:The clearance rate of metastatic lymph nodes was 86.95% (40/46) in group A, which was higher than 72.22% (52/72) in group B, and the difference was statistically significant ( χ2 = 3.55, P = 0.049). There were no statistical differences in operation time and intraoperative blood loss between the two groups (all P > 0.05). The overall response rate was 86.36% (38/44) in group A, which was higher than 74.28% (52/70) in group B, and the difference was statistically significant ( χ2 = 5.03, P = 0.024). The incidence of complications in group A was 9.09% (4/44), which was not significantly different from that in group B (11.42%,8/70) ( χ2 = 0.16, P = 0.692). The recurrence rate within 1 year of group A was 11.36% (5/44), which was lower than that of group B (24.42%, 15/70), but the difference was not statistically significant ( χ2 = 1.89, P = 0.169). Conclusions:Compared with conventional laparoscopy, fluorescent laparoscopic radical resection of colorectal cancer has better clinical efficacy, higher clearance rate of metastatic lymph nodes, and does not increase the incidence of postoperative metastasis and complications.