1.Linear Association between Frailty as Assessed by the Kihon Checklist and Quality of Life in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Cross-Sectional Population-Based Study
Suguru SHIMOKIHARA ; Kazuki YOKOYAMA ; Hikaru IHIRA ; Yuriko MATSUZAKI-KIHARA ; Atsushi MIZUMOTO ; Hideyuki TASHIRO ; Hidekazu SAITO ; Keitaro MAKINO ; Kiyotaka SHIMADA ; Kosuke YAMA ; Ryo MIYAJIMA ; Takeshi SASAKI ; Nozomu IKEDA
Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research 2025;29(1):66-74
Background:
The need for support focused on frailty and quality of life (QoL) in older adults is increasing. The Kihon Checklist (KCL) is a comprehensive and easy-to-use tool to assess frailty in older adults. Previous studies have shown associations between frailty and QoL; however, few studies have investigated the association between frailty using the KCL and QoL. In this study, the quantitative relationship between the KCL and QoL in community-dwelling older adults was investigated.
Methods:
This cross-sectional study included from participants in the 2017–2019 baseline survey of a cohort study of community-dwelling older adults in Sapporo, Japan. The World Health Organization-Five Well-Being Index (WHO-5) was used to assess QoL. The KCL was used to assess frailty, and the relationship between frailty and QoL was examined using binomial logistic regression analysis and restricted cubic spline models.
Results:
Four-hundred participants were included in the analysis. Of the participants, 22.5% had a lower QoL and they were more likely to have frailty than healthy participants (p<0.001). The KCL scores were significantly associated with a lower QoL (p<0.001). Furthermore, the association between the KCL score and QoL was linear, and subscales of activities of daily living, and depressive mood were significantly associated with a lower QoL.
Conclusion
The KCL, a comprehensive frailty questionnaire, was associated with a lower QoL in older adults. To maintain QoL in community-dwelling older adults, it is necessary to provide them with appropriate support from the stage before they are identified as frail by the KCL.
2.Linear Association between Frailty as Assessed by the Kihon Checklist and Quality of Life in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Cross-Sectional Population-Based Study
Suguru SHIMOKIHARA ; Kazuki YOKOYAMA ; Hikaru IHIRA ; Yuriko MATSUZAKI-KIHARA ; Atsushi MIZUMOTO ; Hideyuki TASHIRO ; Hidekazu SAITO ; Keitaro MAKINO ; Kiyotaka SHIMADA ; Kosuke YAMA ; Ryo MIYAJIMA ; Takeshi SASAKI ; Nozomu IKEDA
Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research 2025;29(1):66-74
Background:
The need for support focused on frailty and quality of life (QoL) in older adults is increasing. The Kihon Checklist (KCL) is a comprehensive and easy-to-use tool to assess frailty in older adults. Previous studies have shown associations between frailty and QoL; however, few studies have investigated the association between frailty using the KCL and QoL. In this study, the quantitative relationship between the KCL and QoL in community-dwelling older adults was investigated.
Methods:
This cross-sectional study included from participants in the 2017–2019 baseline survey of a cohort study of community-dwelling older adults in Sapporo, Japan. The World Health Organization-Five Well-Being Index (WHO-5) was used to assess QoL. The KCL was used to assess frailty, and the relationship between frailty and QoL was examined using binomial logistic regression analysis and restricted cubic spline models.
Results:
Four-hundred participants were included in the analysis. Of the participants, 22.5% had a lower QoL and they were more likely to have frailty than healthy participants (p<0.001). The KCL scores were significantly associated with a lower QoL (p<0.001). Furthermore, the association between the KCL score and QoL was linear, and subscales of activities of daily living, and depressive mood were significantly associated with a lower QoL.
Conclusion
The KCL, a comprehensive frailty questionnaire, was associated with a lower QoL in older adults. To maintain QoL in community-dwelling older adults, it is necessary to provide them with appropriate support from the stage before they are identified as frail by the KCL.
3.Linear Association between Frailty as Assessed by the Kihon Checklist and Quality of Life in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Cross-Sectional Population-Based Study
Suguru SHIMOKIHARA ; Kazuki YOKOYAMA ; Hikaru IHIRA ; Yuriko MATSUZAKI-KIHARA ; Atsushi MIZUMOTO ; Hideyuki TASHIRO ; Hidekazu SAITO ; Keitaro MAKINO ; Kiyotaka SHIMADA ; Kosuke YAMA ; Ryo MIYAJIMA ; Takeshi SASAKI ; Nozomu IKEDA
Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research 2025;29(1):66-74
Background:
The need for support focused on frailty and quality of life (QoL) in older adults is increasing. The Kihon Checklist (KCL) is a comprehensive and easy-to-use tool to assess frailty in older adults. Previous studies have shown associations between frailty and QoL; however, few studies have investigated the association between frailty using the KCL and QoL. In this study, the quantitative relationship between the KCL and QoL in community-dwelling older adults was investigated.
Methods:
This cross-sectional study included from participants in the 2017–2019 baseline survey of a cohort study of community-dwelling older adults in Sapporo, Japan. The World Health Organization-Five Well-Being Index (WHO-5) was used to assess QoL. The KCL was used to assess frailty, and the relationship between frailty and QoL was examined using binomial logistic regression analysis and restricted cubic spline models.
Results:
Four-hundred participants were included in the analysis. Of the participants, 22.5% had a lower QoL and they were more likely to have frailty than healthy participants (p<0.001). The KCL scores were significantly associated with a lower QoL (p<0.001). Furthermore, the association between the KCL score and QoL was linear, and subscales of activities of daily living, and depressive mood were significantly associated with a lower QoL.
Conclusion
The KCL, a comprehensive frailty questionnaire, was associated with a lower QoL in older adults. To maintain QoL in community-dwelling older adults, it is necessary to provide them with appropriate support from the stage before they are identified as frail by the KCL.
4.Examination of Factors Associated with Self-Reported Cane Use among Community-Dwelling Older Adults
Taishiro KAMASAKI ; Hiroshi OTAO ; Mizuki HACHIYA ; Atsuko KUBO ; Hiroyuki OKAWA ; Asuka SAKAMOTO ; Kazuhiko FUJIWARA ; Kodai HOSAKA ; Takahiro KITAJIMA ; Suguru SHIMOKIHARA ; Michio MARUTA ; Gwanghee HAN ; Yasuhiro MIZOKAMI ; Minoru KAMATA ; Takayuki TABIRA
Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research 2025;29(1):102-110
Background:
This study investigates factors influencing cane use among older adults and identifies most significant determinants.
Methods:
This study is a cross-sectional study. A total of 160 community-dwelling older adults (mean age, 79±7 years) were included in the analysis. Binomial logistic regression analysis was conducted using the presence or absence of cane use as the dependent variable, and the associated factors were investigated.
Results:
There were 108 participants (mean age, 77±7 years) in the cane-non-using group and 52 (mean age, 83±6 years) in the cane-using group. Factors associated with the presence or absence of cane use were open-eyed one-leg standing time (odds ratio [OR]=0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.70–0.93; p=0.003) and depressed mood (OR=2.78; 95% CI, 1.31–5.91; p=0.008).
Conclusion
Older adults with reduced balance ability and depressive mood need to use a cane. This highlights the need to assess balance ability and depressed mood in prescribing a cane to older adults. Appropriate prescription of canes has the potential to enrich the lives of older adults by contributing to their safe range of activities.
5.Examination of Factors Associated with Self-Reported Cane Use among Community-Dwelling Older Adults
Taishiro KAMASAKI ; Hiroshi OTAO ; Mizuki HACHIYA ; Atsuko KUBO ; Hiroyuki OKAWA ; Asuka SAKAMOTO ; Kazuhiko FUJIWARA ; Kodai HOSAKA ; Takahiro KITAJIMA ; Suguru SHIMOKIHARA ; Michio MARUTA ; Gwanghee HAN ; Yasuhiro MIZOKAMI ; Minoru KAMATA ; Takayuki TABIRA
Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research 2025;29(1):102-110
Background:
This study investigates factors influencing cane use among older adults and identifies most significant determinants.
Methods:
This study is a cross-sectional study. A total of 160 community-dwelling older adults (mean age, 79±7 years) were included in the analysis. Binomial logistic regression analysis was conducted using the presence or absence of cane use as the dependent variable, and the associated factors were investigated.
Results:
There were 108 participants (mean age, 77±7 years) in the cane-non-using group and 52 (mean age, 83±6 years) in the cane-using group. Factors associated with the presence or absence of cane use were open-eyed one-leg standing time (odds ratio [OR]=0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.70–0.93; p=0.003) and depressed mood (OR=2.78; 95% CI, 1.31–5.91; p=0.008).
Conclusion
Older adults with reduced balance ability and depressive mood need to use a cane. This highlights the need to assess balance ability and depressed mood in prescribing a cane to older adults. Appropriate prescription of canes has the potential to enrich the lives of older adults by contributing to their safe range of activities.
6.Examination of Factors Associated with Self-Reported Cane Use among Community-Dwelling Older Adults
Taishiro KAMASAKI ; Hiroshi OTAO ; Mizuki HACHIYA ; Atsuko KUBO ; Hiroyuki OKAWA ; Asuka SAKAMOTO ; Kazuhiko FUJIWARA ; Kodai HOSAKA ; Takahiro KITAJIMA ; Suguru SHIMOKIHARA ; Michio MARUTA ; Gwanghee HAN ; Yasuhiro MIZOKAMI ; Minoru KAMATA ; Takayuki TABIRA
Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research 2025;29(1):102-110
Background:
This study investigates factors influencing cane use among older adults and identifies most significant determinants.
Methods:
This study is a cross-sectional study. A total of 160 community-dwelling older adults (mean age, 79±7 years) were included in the analysis. Binomial logistic regression analysis was conducted using the presence or absence of cane use as the dependent variable, and the associated factors were investigated.
Results:
There were 108 participants (mean age, 77±7 years) in the cane-non-using group and 52 (mean age, 83±6 years) in the cane-using group. Factors associated with the presence or absence of cane use were open-eyed one-leg standing time (odds ratio [OR]=0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.70–0.93; p=0.003) and depressed mood (OR=2.78; 95% CI, 1.31–5.91; p=0.008).
Conclusion
Older adults with reduced balance ability and depressive mood need to use a cane. This highlights the need to assess balance ability and depressed mood in prescribing a cane to older adults. Appropriate prescription of canes has the potential to enrich the lives of older adults by contributing to their safe range of activities.