OBJECTIVE: To explore the clinical efficacy of intrathecally administered low dose sufentanil-bupivacaine in transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). METHODS. Ninety patient (ASA I - III) undergoing TURP were randomly divided into 3 groups (n = 30); Group A, B and C. Group A received 7.5 mg bupivacaine + 5 microg sufentanil + 10% glucose; Group B received 7.5 mg bupivacaine + 7.5 microg sufentanil + 10% glucose; Group C received 15 mg bupivacaine + 10% glucose. The volume was 3 mL in every group. SP, DP, HR, SpO2, the degree of motor and sensory blockade and the side effect were observed. RESULTS: SP/DP was significantly decreased in Group C than that in Group and Group B (p<0.05), HR and SpO2 in group B were decreased to different degrees 15 min after the injection (p<0.05). The complete recovery time of motor nerve blockade and the regression time of sensory blockade were obviously prolonged in Group C (p<0.05). There were no significant differences in analgesic effect among the three groups during the operation, but the incidence of pruritus was higher in both group A and Group B than that in Group C during the first 24 hours after the injection. CONCLUSION Spinal anesthesia with low dose sufentanil-bupivacaine possesses relatively steady hemodynamics. The blockade degree of motor and sensory blockade in this spinal anesthesia is lower than that in standard spinal bupivacaine in TURP.
Aged ; Anesthesia, Spinal ; Bupivacaine ; administration & dosage ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Sufentanil ; administration & dosage ; Transurethral Resection of Prostate

OBJECTIVETo observe the effectiveness of conscious sedation with midazolam, propofol and sufentanil for patients in plastic surgery.

METHODS81 patients, scheduled for plastic surgery, were randomly selected to receive conscious sedation with midazolam 0.05 mg x kg(-1) and sufentanil 0.1 microg x kg(-1) intravenously, following by a continuous infusion of midazolam-propofol-sufentanil combination (midazolam 5 mg + propofol 200 mg + sufentanil 10 microg, a total of 23 ml). The initial infusion rate was 0.2 ml x kg(-1) x h(-1), and was adjusted (in 20% of initial infusion rate increment) to maintain OAA/S score as 11 during the operation. The patients' vital signs, discomfort and level of sedation were evaluated at 5 to 10 min intervals until the end of the surgery. The complications (i. e. anoxemia, apnea, restlessness, nausea and vomiting), anesthesia duration and drug consumption were recorded. The drug infusion was discontinued at 5 - 10 min before the end of the surgical procedure. On the first postoperative day, patients were asked to rate their satisfaction with the anesthetic management and whether they would choose to receive the same anesthetic technique if necessary in the future.

RESULTSThe OAA/S score decreased from 20.0 +/- 0 to 11.9 +/- 2.6 after midazolam and sufentanil IV (P < 0.05), and was maintained as 10.5-11.1 during the procedure. At the end of the procedure, the OAA/S score returned to 16.0 +/- 2.2, which was also lower significantly compared with baseline value (P < 0.05). The induction of sedation produced a significant decrease in SBP and DBP (P < 0.05) and no significant changes in heart rate (P > 0.05). At the end of the procedure, SBP, DBP and HR returned to the baseline value. The anoxemia happened in 11 cases, apnea in 5 cases and restlessness in 2. No nausea and vomiting occurred. The anesthesia duration and consumption of midazolam, propofol and sufentanil were (101.1 +/- 42.5) min, (8.4 +/- 3.7) mg, (189.1 +/- 88.7) mg and (18.2 +/- 5.6) microg respectively. In an interview on the first postoperative day, 96% (78/ 81) of the patients were satisfied with their anesthesia and were willing to receive the same anesthetic technique if necessary in the future.

CONCLUSIONConscious sedation with midazolam, propofol and sufentanil is an effective anesthetic technique for patients in plastic surgery.

Adolescent ; Adult ; Conscious Sedation ; methods ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Midazolam ; administration & dosage ; Middle Aged ; Propofol ; administration & dosage ; Sufentanil ; administration & dosage ; Surgery, Plastic ; Young Adult

BACKGROUNDSufentanil target controlled infusion (TCI) provides stable analgesia, better hemodynamic control than a bolus injection of intravenous anesthetics, anticipated recovery and improved quality of anesthesia during perioperative period. This study evaluated the accuracy and feasibility of TCI system for sufentanil at high concentrations in Chinese surgical patients.

METHODSTwelve low risk adult patients undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia were included in this study. Sufentanil was administered with a specific TCI system incorporating the population pharmacokinetic data of sufentanil previously reported, using a target effect-site concentration of sufentanil 4 or 6 ng/ml. Sufentanil TCI duration was 30 minutes. Frequent arterial blood samples were taken during and up to 24 hours after sufentanil TCI for determination of plasma sufentanil concentrations by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry. The changes of circulatory system function during the procedure, recovery profile and adverse effects were recorded. Measured plasma sufentanil concentrations were compared with the values predicted by the TCI system. The bias (median performance error, MDPE), precision (median absolute performance error, MDAPE) and wobble (variability of performance error) of the sufentanil TCI system were determined.

RESULTSAll patients had stable cardiovascular variables during induction and maintenance of anesthesia. Time to eye opening and extubation were (5.6 + or - 1.7) minutes when TCI set to 4 ng/ml and (7.2 + or - 2.3) minutes when set to 6 ng/ml. There was no episode of agitation, muscle rigidity or intraoperative awareness. The bias (MDPE), precision (MDAPE) and wobble of the sufentanil TCI system were -3.7%, 18.9% and 19.6% respectively during TCI, and the MDPE, MDAPE and wobble were -29.1%, 31.7% and 15.0% respectively after TCI (up to 8 hours).

CONCLUSIONSThe TCI system programmed for sufentanil at 4 or 6 ng/ml was considered acceptable for clinical use in low risk Chinese surgical patients. But the relatively larger MDPE and MDAPE after TCI suggest improvements of the pharmacokinetic model are needed.

Adult ; Aged ; Anesthetics, Intravenous ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; Chromatography, Liquid ; Female ; Humans ; Infusions, Intravenous ; methods ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Sufentanil ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; Tandem Mass Spectrometry ; Young Adult

Adult ; Aged ; Analgesics, Opioid ; administration & dosage ; pharmacology ; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug ; Female ; Humans ; Injections, Spinal ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pupil ; drug effects ; Sufentanil ; administration & dosage ; pharmacology

BACKGROUNDSufentanil is a suitable choice for target-controlled infusion (TCI) because of its shorter context-sensitive half-time. The current study was to estimate the pharmacokinetics of sufentanil TCI in Chinese patients using the two-stage analysis.

METHODSTwelve adult patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I or II undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia were included. Anesthesia was induced with propofol, rocuronium and sufentanil administered by TCI lasting for 30 minutes, with target effect-site concentration of sufentanil 4 or 6 ng/ml. Frequent arterial blood samples (1.5 ml) were taken during and up to 24 hours after sufentanil TCI. Before the end of surgery, another arterial blood sample (1.0 ml) was drawn for the blood-gas analysis. Plasma sufentanil concentrations were determined by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (limit of quantitation was 5 pg/ml). The data were analyzed with the two-stage approach, linear regression and correlation analysis.

RESULTSThe pharmacokinetics of sufentanil TCI were adequately described by a three-compartment model. The variables were derived as follows: the volume of central compartment (V(1)) was 5.4 L, volume of distribution at steady-state (Vdss) was 222.6 L, metabolic clearance (Cl(1)) was 0.84 L/min and elimination half-life (t(1/2Y)) was 389 minutes. Patients' age, gender and PaCO2 correlated significantly with the pharmacokinetic parameters. The Vdss, volume of slowly equilibrating compartment (V(3)) and t(1/2Y) increased, and rapid distribution clearance (Cl(2)) decreased with increasing patient age. Male patients had larger values of Vdss, volume of rapidly equilibrating compartment (V(2)) and V(3) than female patients. The Vdss and V(3) increased with higher PaCO2 values. There were no significant correlations between the pharmacokinetic variables and body weight, height, lean body mass, plasma albumin, sufentanil dose, duration of surgery, pH or base excess of blood (BE-B).

CONCLUSIONSThe pharmacokinetics of sufentanil TCI in Chinese patients can be optimally described by a three-compartment model. The pharmacokinetic analysis technique may affect the pharmacokinetic parameters and correlations.

Adult ; Aged ; Anesthetics, Intravenous ; administration & dosage ; pharmacokinetics ; Asian Continental Ancestry Group ; Chromatography, Liquid ; Female ; Humans ; Infusions, Intravenous ; methods ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Sufentanil ; administration & dosage ; pharmacokinetics ; Young Adult

OBJECTIVETo define the ideal time window for intubation after rocuronium administration during target-controlled infusion (TCI) ofpropofol and sulfentanil.

METHODSOne hundred and twenty elective surgical patients (age range 18-55 years) were randomized into 4 groups (n=30) according to the intubation time after administration of the muscle relaxant. Patients with predicted difficult airway were excluded. General anesthesia was induced by TCI of propofol and sulfentanil. A senior anesthesiologist blinded for the randomization performed the intubations at 1, 2, 3, or 4 min after injection of rocuronium, and the vocal card visibility was evaluated upon full exposure of the vocal cord and the intubation conditions assessed according to Cooper's score.

RESULTSThe intubation conditions were excellent or good in all patients, but the vocal cord visibility at 2-4 min differed significantly from that at 1 min after rocuronium administration (P<0.01). Suppression of the neuromuscular function 1 min after rocuronium administration differed significantly from that at other time points (P<0.01).

CONCLUSIONThe condition of vocal cord can be more suitable for intubation at 2-4 min than at 1 min after rocuronium administration as the ideal time window for intubation during TCI of propofol and sulfentanil.

Adolescent ; Adult ; Androstanols ; administration & dosage ; Anesthetics, Intravenous ; administration & dosage ; Humans ; Infusions, Intravenous ; Intubation ; methods ; Middle Aged ; Neuromuscular Nondepolarizing Agents ; administration & dosage ; Propofol ; administration & dosage ; Single-Blind Method ; Sufentanil ; administration & dosage ; Time Factors ; Vocal Cords ; drug effects ; Young Adult

OBJECTIVETo investigate the effect of sufentanil administered intrathecally at different doses on the clinical effect of bupivacaine spinal anesthesia in gynecologic laparoscopy.

METHODSSixty patients with ectopic pregnancy undergoing elective laparoscopy (ASA class I-II) were randomized into 4 groups (groups A, B, C and D), and received spinal anesthesia with 15 mg bupivacaine and sufentanil at 0, 2.5, 5 and 7.5 microg, respectively. When the patients complained of discomforts, showed bodily movements, had heart rate over 100 beats/min, or showed blood pressure increment by 20%, additional doses of propofol were given. The onset time of sensory block, time to Bromage scale 3 motor block, time to the highest sensory block level, time of operation and recovery from anesthesia, and the total dosages of propofol were recorded along with the sedative score and the side effects.

RESULTSThe 4 groups were comparable for age, body weight, height and operation time (range 60-65 min) (P>0.05). Both the onset time of sensory block and the time of Bromage scale 3 motor block in groups C and D were significantly shorter than those in groups A and B (P<0.05). The time of the highest sensory block in group D was shorter than that in group A (P<0.05). Compared to the group A, the dose of propofol was reduced in groups B, C, and D by 7.1%, 28.1%, and 34.8%, respectively; propofol doses in groups C and D were significantly lower than those in groups A and B (P<0.05). Pruritus associated with the spinal anesthesia occurred in 4 (26.7%), 3 (20%), and 6 (40%) cases in groups B, C and D, respectively.

CONCLUSIONSIntrathecal sufentanil dose-dependently affect the effect of bupivacaine spinal anesthesia, and larger sufentanil dose produces better effects but more side effects. According to our results, 5.0 microg is the optimal dose for sufentanil.

Adult ; Analgesics, Opioid ; administration & dosage ; Anesthesia, Obstetrical ; methods ; Anesthesia, Spinal ; methods ; Anesthetics, Local ; administration & dosage ; Bupivacaine ; administration & dosage ; Female ; Humans ; Injections, Spinal ; Laparoscopy ; methods ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy, Ectopic ; surgery ; Sufentanil ; administration & dosage ; Treatment Outcome ; Young Adult

BACKGROUNDTarget-controlled infusion (TCI) has been recently developed and successfully implemented in clinical practice. This study was conducted to determine the pharmacokinetics of TCI administered sufentanil in Chinese surgical patients.

METHODSThe pharmacokinetics of sufentanil was investigated in 12 adult patients, aged 23-76 years, scheduled for prolonged surgery under general anesthesia. Anesthetic induction was carried out with propofol, rocuronium and TCI administered sufentanil aiming for target effect-site concentration of sufentanil 4 or 6 ng/ml. Sufentanil TCI lasted for 30 minutes. Frequent arterial blood samples (1.5 ml) were drawn during and up to 24 hours after sufentanil TCI. Plasma sufentanil concentrations were measured by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry; limit of sensitivity of mass spectrometry was 5 pg/ml. The data were analyzed with the nonlinear mixed-effect model program.

RESULTSThe pharmacokinetics of TCI administered sufentanil were optimally described by a three-compartment model with the following parameters: the central volume of distribution (V(1))=5.4 L, the volume of distribution at steady-state (Vdss)=195.4 L, systemic clearance (Cl(1))=1.10 L/min, and elimination half-life (t(1/2) gamma)=271.8 minutes. Both age and gender affected the pharmacokinetic parameters. The rapid distribution clearance (Cl(2)) was negatively correlated with patient age, and the volume of slowly equilibrating compartment (V(3)) was positively correlated with age. The Cl(2) and the volume of rapidly equilibrating compartment (V(2)) were influenced by gender with male patients showing higher values of Cl(2) and V(2) than female patients. There was no relationship of body weight, lean body mass, plasma albumin, or target effect-site concentration of sufentanil with any of the pharmacokinetic parameters studied.

CONCLUSIONSThe pharmacokinetics of TCI administered sufentanil in Chinese patients can be adequately described by a three-compartment model. Pharmacokinetics adjusted to the individual patient should improve the accuracy of TCI systems.

Adult ; Aged ; Asian Continental Ancestry Group ; Female ; Humans ; Infusions, Intravenous ; methods ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Sufentanil ; administration & dosage ; blood ; pharmacokinetics ; Young Adult

OBJECTIVETo investigate the value of Narcotrend (NT) index monitoring versus standard hemodynamic parameters in predicting the recovery of consciousness in patients undergoing abdominal surgery.

METHODSForty ASA I or II patients undergoing elective abdominal surgery were randomized into two groups to receive sevoflurane-sufentanil anesthesia monitored by NT index or solely by clinical parameters. Anesthesia was induced with the inhalation of 8% sevoflurane and sufentanil target-controlled infusion at 0.2-0.5 ng/ml. The values of NT stage (NTS), NT index (NTI), and hemodynamic parameters (MAP and HR) were recorded during the period of recovery. The prediction probability (Pk) of each parameter was calculated and compared.

RESULTSNTS and NTl were closely correlated to the changes of consciousness during the recovery from general anesthesia. The Pk values of NTS and NTI in predicting eye opening and orientation recovery were 0.95, 0.92, and 0.92, 0.89, respectively, obviously higher than the Pk values of MAP and HR (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONNT monitoring can be used to effectively predict the recovery of consciousness in patients undergoing abdominal surgery and facilitates a significant reduction of the recovery time and sufentanil dosage during a sevoflurane-sufentanil anesthesia.

Abdomen ; surgery ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Anesthesia Recovery Period ; Anesthesia, General ; Anesthetics, Inhalation ; administration & dosage ; Anesthetics, Intravenous ; Electroencephalography ; methods ; Female ; Hemodynamics ; Humans ; Male ; Methyl Ethers ; administration & dosage ; Middle Aged ; Monitoring, Intraoperative ; methods ; Sufentanil ; administration & dosage ; Unconsciousness ; chemically induced ; Young Adult

PURPOSE: This study examined the sparing effect of sufentanil on the median effective concentration (EC50) of epidural ropivacaine in elderly patients undergoing elective transurethral resection of prostate (TURP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a prospective randomized double-blind dose-response study. Fifty eight elderly patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-II who were scheduled for TURP surgery under epidural anesthesia were randomly allocated to a group receiving 15 mL of ropivacaine (group R) or a group receiving ropivacaine plus 5 microg of sufentanil (group RS). The concentration of ropivacaine was determined by a Dixon's up-and-down sequential allocation. The first participant received 0.3% of ropivacaine in both groups and subsequent concentrations were determined by the response of the previous patient in the same group. The EC50 of epidural ropivacaine was analyzed using the Dixon and Massey method. RESULTS: The EC50 of ropivacaine during TURP surgery was 0.186% (95% confidence interval, 0.173-0.200%) in group R, and 0.136% (95% confidence interval, 0.127-0.144%) in group RS (p<0.01). No differences in Bromage scale of motor block examination and the onset time of sensory block were observed. CONCLUSION: Administration of 5 microg of epidural sufentanil caused a 37% reduction in the EC50 of epidural ropivacaine in elderly patients who underwent TURP surgery. Thus, sufentanil addition during surgery of TURP can decrease the dose of ropivacaine anesthesia required.
Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Amides/*administration & dosage ; Anesthesia, Epidural/*methods ; Anesthetics, Local/*administration & dosage ; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug ; Double-Blind Method ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pain Measurement ; Prospective Studies ; Sufentanil/*administration & dosage ; *Transurethral Resection of Prostate ; Treatment Outcome