2.Solitary Rectal Ulcer Syndrome in Children: A Report of Six Cases.
Nafiye URGANCI ; Derya KALYONCU ; Kamile Gulcin EKEN
Gut and Liver 2013;7(6):752-755
Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (SRUS) is a rare, benign disorder in children that usually presents with rectal bleeding, constipation, mucous discharge, prolonged straining, tenesmus, lower abdominal pain, and localized pain in the perineal area. The underlying etiology is not well understood, but it is secondary to ischemic changes and trauma in the rectum associated with paradoxical contraction of the pelvic floor and the external anal sphincter muscles; rectal prolapse has also been implicated in the pathogenesis. This syndrome is diagnosed based on clinical symptoms and endoscopic and histological findings, but SRUS often goes unrecognized or is easily confused with other diseases such as inflammatory bowel disease, amoebiasis, malignancy, and other causes of rectal bleeding such as a juvenile polyps. SRUS should be suspected in patients experiencing rectal discharge of blood and mucus in addition to previous disorders of evacuation. We herein report six pediatric cases with SRUS.
Adolescent
;
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use
;
Anti-Ulcer Agents/therapeutic use
;
Child
;
Colonoscopy
;
Female
;
Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/*diagnosis
;
Humans
;
Male
;
Mesalamine/therapeutic use
;
Rectal Diseases/*diagnosis/drug therapy
;
Steroids/therapeutic use
;
Sucralfate/therapeutic use
;
Syndrome
;
Ulcer/*diagnosis/drug therapy
3.Gastro-protecting effect of gefarnate on chronic erosive gastritis with dyspeptic symptoms.
Yi-Qi DU ; Tun SU ; Jian-Yu HAO ; Bang-Mao WANG ; Min-Hu CHEN ; You-Ming LI ; Cheng-Wei TANG ; Yan-Fang GONG ; Xiao-Hua MAN ; Li GAO ; Quan-Cai CAI ; Zhao-Shen LI
Chinese Medical Journal 2012;125(16):2878-2884
BACKGROUNDThe role of gastro-protecting agents on symptomatic chronic gastritis is unclear. This multicenter, open, randomized trial was designed to compare the comprehensive effects of gefarnate with sucralfate on erosive gastritis with dyspeptic symptoms.
METHODSTotally 253 dyspepsia patients confirmed with erosive gastritis were enrolled from six centers in China. They randomly received either daily 300 mg gefarnate or 3 g sucralfate for six weeks. The primary endpoint was the effective rate of both treatments on endoscopic erosion at week six.
RESULTSGefarnate showed an effective rate of 72% and 67% on endoscopic score and dyspeptic symptom release, which is statistically higher than sucralfate (40.1% and 39.3%, P < 0.001, intension-to-treat). For histological improvement, gefarnate showed both effective in decreasing mucosal chronic inflammation (57.7% vs. 24.8%, P < 0.001, intension-to-treat) and active inflammation (36.4% vs. 23.1%, P < 0.05, intension-to-treat) than the control. A significant increase of prostaglandins and decrease of myeloperoxidase in mucosa were observed in gefarnate group. Severity of erosion is non-relevant to symptoms but Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) status does affect the outcome of therapy.
CONCLUSIONSGefarnate demonstrates an effective outcome on the mucosal inflammation in patients with chronic erosive gastritis. Endoscopic and inflammation score should be the major indexes used in gastritis-related trials.
Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Anti-Ulcer Agents ; therapeutic use ; Dyspepsia ; drug therapy ; Female ; Gastritis ; drug therapy ; Gefarnate ; therapeutic use ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Sucralfate ; therapeutic use ; Treatment Outcome ; Young Adult