Background/Aims: Efficacy of proton pump inhibitors is limited in patients with nonerosive reflux disease (NERD). The aim of this study was to comparatively evaluate the efficacy and safety of esomeprazole with sodium bicarbonate and esomeprazole alone. Methods: This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, noninferiority comparative study. A total of 379 patients with NERD were randomly allocated to receive either EsoduoⓇ/sup> (esomeprazole 20 mg with sodium bicarbonate 800 mg) or NexiumⓇ/sup> (esomeprazole 20 mg) once daily for 4 weeks from January 2019 to December 2019. The patients had a history of heartburn for at least 2 days in the week before randomization as well as in the last 3 months and no esophageal mucosal breaks on endoscopy. The primary endpoint was a complete cure of heartburn at week 4. The secondary and exploratory endpoints as well as the safety profiles were compared in the groups at weeks 2 and 4. Results: A total of 355 patients completed the study (180 in the EsoduoⓇ/sup> group and 175 in the NexiumⓇ/sup> group). The proportions of patients without heartburn in the entire 4th week of treatment were not different between the two groups (33.33% in the EsoduoⓇ/sup> group and 35% in the NexiumⓇ/sup> group, p=0.737). There were no significant differences in most of the secondary and exploratory endpoints as well as the safety profiles. Conclusions EsoduoⓇ/sup> is as effective and safe as NexiumⓇ/sup> for managing typical symptoms in patients with NERD (ClinicalTrial.gov identifier: NCT03928470).

Asthma ; Bronchitis ; Cohort Studies ; Cough ; Diagnosis ; Disease Management ; Eosinophils ; Epidemiology ; Female ; Gastroesophageal Reflux ; Humans ; Korea ; Lung Diseases ; Multivariate Analysis ; Observational Study ; Pregnant Women ; Retrospective Studies ; Tuberculosis

BACKGROUND: Chronic cough is defined as a cough lasting more than 8 weeks and socio-economic burden of chronic cough is enormous. The characteristics of chronic cough in Korea are not well understood. The Korean Academy of Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases (KATRD) published guidelines on cough management in 2014. The current study evaluated the clinical characteristics of chronic cough in Korea and the efficacy of the KATRD guidelines. METHODS: This was a multi-center, retrospective observational study conducted in Korea. The participants were over 18 years of age. They had coughs lasting more than 8 weeks. Subjects with current pulmonary diseases, smokers, ex-smokers with more than 10 pack-years or who quit within the past 1 year, pregnant women, and users of cough-inducing medications were excluded. Evaluation and management of cough followed the KATRD cough-management guidelines. RESULTS: Participants with chronic cough in Korea showed age in the late forties and cough duration of more than 1 year. Upper airway cough syndrome was the most common cause of cough, followed by cough-variant asthma (CVA). Gastro-esophageal reflux diseases and eosinophilic bronchitis were less frequently observed. Following the KATRD cough-management guidelines, 91.2% of the subjects improved after 4 weeks of treatment. Responders were younger, had a longer duration of cough, and an initial impression of CVA. In univariate and multivariate analyses, an initial impression of CVA was the only factor related to better treatment response. CONCLUSION The causes of chronic cough in Korea differed from those reported in other countries. The current Korean guidelines proved efficient for treating Korean patients with chronic cough.

BACKGROUND: Chronic cough is defined as a cough lasting more than 8 weeks and socio-economic burden of chronic cough is enormous. The characteristics of chronic cough in Korea are not well understood. The Korean Academy of Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases (KATRD) published guidelines on cough management in 2014. The current study evaluated the clinical characteristics of chronic cough in Korea and the efficacy of the KATRD guidelines. METHODS: This was a multi-center, retrospective observational study conducted in Korea. The participants were over 18 years of age. They had coughs lasting more than 8 weeks. Subjects with current pulmonary diseases, smokers, ex-smokers with more than 10 pack-years or who quit within the past 1 year, pregnant women, and users of cough-inducing medications were excluded. Evaluation and management of cough followed the KATRD cough-management guidelines. RESULTS: Participants with chronic cough in Korea showed age in the late forties and cough duration of more than 1 year. Upper airway cough syndrome was the most common cause of cough, followed by cough-variant asthma (CVA). Gastro-esophageal reflux diseases and eosinophilic bronchitis were less frequently observed. Following the KATRD cough-management guidelines, 91.2% of the subjects improved after 4 weeks of treatment. Responders were younger, had a longer duration of cough, and an initial impression of CVA. In univariate and multivariate analyses, an initial impression of CVA was the only factor related to better treatment response. CONCLUSION The causes of chronic cough in Korea differed from those reported in other countries. The current Korean guidelines proved efficient for treating Korean patients with chronic cough.

This study compared the efficacy of DA-9601 (Dong-A ST Co., Seoul, Korea) and its new formulation, DA-5204 (Dong-A ST Co.), for treating erosive gastritis. This phase III, randomized, multicenter, double-blind, non-inferiority trial randomly assigned 434 patients with endoscopically proven gastric mucosal erosions into two groups: DA-9601 3 times daily or DA-5,204 twice daily for 2 weeks. The final analysis included 421 patients (DA-5204, 209; DA-9601, 212). The primary endpoint (rate of effective gastric erosion healing) and secondary endpoints (cure rate of endoscopic erosion and gastrointestinal [GI] symptom relief) were assessed using endoscopy after the treatment. Drug-related adverse events (AEs), including GI symptoms, were also compared. At week 2, gastric healing rates with DA-5204 and DA-9601 were 42.1% (88/209) and 42.5% (90/212), respectively. The difference between the groups was −0.4% (95% confidence interval, −9.8% to 9.1%), which was above the non-inferiority margin of −14%. The cure rate of gastric erosion in both groups was 37.3%. The improvement rates of GI symptoms with DA-5204 and DA-9601 were 40.4% and 40.8%, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in both secondary endpoints. AEs were reported in 18 (8.4%) patients in the DA-5204 group and 19 (8.8%) in the DA-9601 group. Rates of AE were not different between the two groups. No serious AE or adverse drug reaction (ADR) occurred. These results demonstrate the non-inferiority of DA-5204 compared to DA-9601. DA-5204 is as effective as DA-9601 in the treatment of erosive gastritis. Registered randomized clinical trial at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02282670)
Artemisia ; Double-Blind Method ; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions ; Endoscopy ; Gastritis* ; Humans ; Seoul

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Antispasmodics such as octylonium are widely used to manage irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) symptoms. However, the efficacy and safety of another antispasmodic, tiropramide, remain uncertain. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tiropramide compared with octylonium in patients with IBS. METHODS: In this multicenter, randomized, non-inferiority trial, 287 patients with IBS (143 receiving tiropramide and 144 octylonium) were randomly allocated to either tiropramide 100 mg or octylonium 20 mg t.i.d (means 3 times a day) for 4 weeks. Primary endpoint was the mean change of abdominal pain from baseline assessed by visual analogue scales (VAS) score after 4 weeks of treatment. Secondary endpoints were the changes in abdominal pain from baseline at week 2 and in abdominal discomfort at weeks 2 and 4, using VAS scores, patient-reported symptom improvement including stool frequency and consistency, using symptom diaries, IBS-quality of life (IBS-QoL), and depression and anxiety, at week 4. RESULTS: The VAS scores of abdominal pain at week 4, were significantly decreased in both tiropramide and octylonium groups, but the change from baseline did not differ between the 2 groups (difference,-0.26 mm; 95% CI,-4.33-3.82; P = 0.901). Abdominal pain and discomfort assessed using VAS scores, diaries, and IBS-QoL were also improved by both treatments, and the changes from baseline did not differ. The incidence of adverse events was similar in the 2 groups, and no severe adverse events involving either drug were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Tiropramide is as effective as octylonium in managing abdominal pain in IBS, with a similar safety profile.
Abdominal Pain ; Anxiety ; Depression ; Humans ; Incidence ; Irritable Bowel Syndrome* ; Parasympatholytics ; Weights and Measures

In addition to inhibiting cyclooxygenase and prostaglandin, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) may cause gastroduodenal injuries due to reactive oxygen species produced by recruited inflammatory cells. DA-9601 is a novel antioxidant with anti-inflammatory and cyto-protective effects. This study was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of DA-9601 with misoprostol for preventing NSAID-associated gastroduodenal injury. In this randomized, double-blind, multicenter, noninferiority trial we compared the extents of protection of gastric and duodenal mucosae by endoscopy after 4 weeks of treatment with DA-9601 60 mg or misoprostol 200 microg three times daily, in subjects with normal baseline endoscopic findings who received an NSAID twice daily for 4 weeks. A total of 266 subjects were randomized to treatment. At week 4, the gastric protection rates with DA-9601 and misoprostol were 85.1% and 95.2%, respectively; the difference between the groups was -10.1% (var = 0.001), which was shown to indicate noninferiority of DA-9601 compared to misoprostol. Adverse events were lower in the DA-9601 group, 56.4% (95% CI, 48.0%-64.8%) than in the misoprostol group, 69.2% (95% CI, 61.3%-77.0%) (P = 0.031). DA-9601 is not inferior to misoprostol for preventing NSAID-associated gastroduodenal injury, and superior to it with respect to treatment-related side effects.
Adolescent ; Adult ; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/*adverse effects ; Double-Blind Method ; Duodenal Ulcer/chemically induced/*prevention & control ; Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal ; Female ; Gastric Mucosa/drug effects ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Misoprostol/*adverse effects ; Plant Extracts/*adverse effects ; Stomach Ulcer/chemically induced/*prevention & control

BACKGROUND: The methacholine bronchial provocation test is a useful tool for evaluating asthma in patients with normal or near normal baseline lung function. However, the sensitivity of this test is 82~92% at most. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical usefulness of FEF(25-75%) in identification of airway hyperresponsiveness in patients with suspected asthmatic symptoms. METHODS: One hundred twenty-five patients who experienced cough and wheezing within one week prior to their visiting the clinic were enrolled. RESULTS: Sixty-four subjects showed no significant reduction of FEV1 or FEF(25-75%) on the methacholine bronchial provocation test (Group I). In 24 patients, FEF(25-75%) fell more than 20% from baseline without a 20% fall of FEV1 during methacholine challenge (Group II). All patients who had more than 20% fall of FEV1 (n=37) also showed more than 20% of reduction in FEF(25-75%) (Group III). Baseline FEV1/FVC (%) and FEF(25-75%) (L) were higher in group II than group III (81.51+/-1.56% vs. 75.02+/-1.60%, p<0.001, 3.25+/-0.21 L vs. 2.45+/-0.21 L, p=0.013, respectively). Group II had greater reductions of both FEV1 and FEF(25-75%) than group I at 25 mg/mL of methacholine (p<0.001). The provocative concentration of methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEF(25-75%) in group II was about three-fold higher than that in group III. CONCLUSION: A 20% fall of FEF(25-75%) by methacholine provocation can be more sensitive indicator for detecting a milder form of airway hyperresponsiveness than FEV1 criteria.
Asthma ; Bronchial Provocation Tests ; Cough ; Humans ; Lung ; Methacholine Chloride ; Respiratory Sounds

The successful treatment of community-acquired pneumonia requires appropriate, empirical antimicrobial therapy. The etiology and antimicrobial susceptibility of major pneumonia pathogens can differ by country. Therefore, the ideal treatment guidelines for community-acquired pneumonia should be based on the studies performed in each country. We developed a treatment guideline for community-acquired pneumonia for immunocompetent adults in Korea. This guideline was developed by the joint committee of the Korean Society for Chemotherapy, the Korean Society of Infectious Diseases, and the Korean Academy of Tuberculosis and Respiratory diseases.
Adult ; Anti-Bacterial Agents ; Communicable Diseases ; Humans ; Joints ; Korea ; Pneumonia ; Tuberculosis

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The recent introduction of computerized surveillance systems has promoted the monitoring of adverse drug reactions (ADRs), a feature that facilitates voluntary reports and enables prompt feedback. To investigate the causative agents and severity of ADRs that occurred in a single hospital, we analyzed the features of 980 ADRs that occurred over 14 months after developing a computerized ADR reporting system in Hallym Sacred Heart Hospital. METHODS: ADR data collected prospectively from September 2007 to October 2008 by a computerized reporting system were analyzed. The World Health Organization-Uppsala Monitoring Center (WHO-UMC) criteria were used to determinate causality for each ADR. RESULTS: The number of ADR cases reported voluntarily increased rapidly since the introduction of the computerized ADR reporting system. Of the 980 cases, antibiotics (34.5%) were the most common causative drugs, followed by analgesics such as tramadol and its compound (15.2%), radiocontrast media (7.0%), narcotics (5.9%), and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (5.5%). Fifty-nine (6.0%) and 206 (21.0%) cases were classified as severe and moderate reactions, respectively. The mean age was older in patients with severe ADRs than in patients with non-severe ADRs. The most common clinical features were skin manifestations, such as pruritus, skin eruptions, and urticaria. Gastrointestinal symptoms including nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea were the second most frequently reported ADRs. Among antibiotics, first-generation cephalosporins were the most frequently reported causative drugs, followed by second-generation cephalosporins, penicillin/beta-lactamase inhibitors, and third-generation cephalosporins. While 11.6% of ADRs related to penicillin/beta-lactamase inhibitors were classified as severe, there was only one severe ADR (1.1%) for first-generation cephalosporins. Most ADRs were reported equally in men and women, although female cases constituted about two thirds of ADRs associated with tramadol and NSAIDs. CONCLUSIONS: We believe that a computerized reporting and replying system promoted the monitoring of ADRs. Antibiotics were reported most frequently as the causative agent of ADRs. Elderly patients seemed to be more susceptible to severe ADRs. With the voluntary reporting system, skin manifestations and gastrointestinal symptoms were detected successfully, while laboratory abnormalities without prominent symptoms seemed to be overlooked. Further efforts to screen for automated ADR signals are required.
Aged ; Analgesics ; Anti-Bacterial Agents ; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal ; Cephalosporins ; Contrast Media ; Diarrhea ; Drug Toxicity ; Electronics ; Electrons ; Female ; Heart ; Humans ; Male ; Narcotics ; Nausea ; Prospective Studies ; Pruritus ; Skin ; Skin Manifestations ; Tramadol ; Urticaria ; Vomiting ; World Health ; World Health Organization