BACKGROUND/AIMS: The risk of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding with dabigatran when compared to warfarin has been controversial in the literature. The aim of our study was to assess this risk with the use of dabigatran. METHODS: We examined the medical records of patients who were started on dabigatran or warfarin from October 2010 to October 2012. The study was conducted in two hospitals. RESULTS: A total of 417 patients were included (208 dabigatran vs. 209 warfarin). GI bleeding occurred in 10 patients (4.8%) in the dabigatran group compared to 21 patients (10.1%) in the warfarin group (p=0.0375). Multivariate analysis showed that patients who were on dabigatran for < or =100 days had a higher incidence of GI bleeding than those who were on it for >100 days (p=0.0007). The odds of GI bleeding in patients who were on dabigatran for < or =100 days was 8.2 times higher compared to those who were on the drug for >100 days. The incidence of GI bleeding in patients >65 years old was higher than in those <65 years old (p=0.0453, OR=3). History of previous GI bleeding was another risk factor for GI bleeding in the dabigatran group (p=0.036, OR=6.3). The lower GI tract was the most common site for GI bleeding in the dabigatran group (80.0% vs. 38.1%, p=0.014). CONCLUSIONS: The risk of GI bleeding was lower with dabigatran. The risk factors for GI bleeding with dabigtran were the first 100 days, age >65 years, and a history of previous GI bleeding.
Age Factors ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Anticoagulants/*adverse effects/therapeutic use ; Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy ; Dabigatran/*adverse effects/therapeutic use ; Female ; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/*chemically induced/epidemiology/mortality ; Humans ; Incidence ; Kaplan-Meier Estimate ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Multivariate Analysis ; Odds Ratio ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Warfarin/*adverse effects/therapeutic use

Background/Aims: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a complex condition precipitated by genetic susceptibility and possibly a disturbed microbiome. The role of dairy foods in IBD is controversial. This study examined the association between lactose intolerance (LI) and IBD. Methods: Data on hospital admissions of all IBD adult patients were extracted from the National Inpatient Sample database between 2004 and 2014. The comorbidities and outcomes of interest were defined by querying all the diagnostic and procedural fields for the corresponding International Classification of Diseases 9th version (ICD-9) codes. Patients with IBD were defined as the “study group,” and the patients who did not have IBD were defined as the “control group”. LI was identified in both groups using the ICD-9 codes. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to examine the association between IBD and LI. Results: The total population was 71,342,237 patients, of which 598,129 (0.83%) had IBD. The IBD patients were younger (52 years vs. 57 years) and with fewer females (57.5% vs. 60.1%) (p<0.001 for all). After adjusting for the potential confounding factors, the IBD group had a significantly higher rate of LI (OR 2.71, 95% CI 2.55-2.88, p<0.001) compared to the non-IBD group. The findings were similar on the further stratification of IBD into Crohn’s disease compared to the control group (OR 2.70, 95% CI 2.50-2.92, p<0.001) and ulcerative colitis compared to the control group (OR 2.71, 95% CI 2.46-2.98, p<0.001). Conclusions IBD patients have a 2.7 times higher risk of LI. Screening for LI in this population is warranted to avoid confusing or overlapping symptomatology.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Recurrence of ischemic colitis (IC) has not been studied extensively. The aim of this study was to investigate the characteristics of recurrent IC in the community setting and to identify any risk factors. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study in two community hospitals. Medical records of patients with IC from January 2007 to January 2013 were reviewed. Demographic details, clinical features, co-morbidities, concomitant use of medications, laboratory studies, imaging findings, endoscopic and histological features, surgery, hospital stay, and death within 30 days were collected. Patients were divided into two groups (recurrent IC group, non-recurrent IC group). RESULTS: A total of 118 patients with IC were identified. IC recurred in 10 patients (8.5%) during the study period. Half of the patients in the recurrent IC group were current smokers as compared to only 18.7% of patients in the non-recurrent group. In the recurrent IC group, 20.0% of patients never smoked as compared to 61.7% in the non-recurrent group (p=0.027). Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) was more frequent in the recurrent IC group (40.0% vs. 4.7%; p=0.003). No differences in other clinical symptoms, CT scan findings, comorbidities, endoscopic features, or use of concomitant medications were observed between the two groups. The need for surgical intervention, blood transfusion, intensive care unit stay, mechanical ventilation, length of hospital stay, and anatomic location of affected segments did not differ between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: IC recurred in 8.5% of patients during the six-year study period. Current smoking status and presence of AAA were identifying risk factors for recurrence of IC.
Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/diagnosis ; Body Mass Index ; Colitis, Ischemic/*diagnosis/pathology/radiography ; Colonoscopy ; Female ; Hospitals, University ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Recurrence ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Severity of Illness Index ; Smoking ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed