1.Safety of Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tubes in Centenarian Patients
Zain A SOBANI ; Kevin TIN ; Steven GUTTMANN ; Anna A ABBASI ; Ira MAYER ; Yuriy TSIRLIN
Clinical Endoscopy 2018;51(1):56-60
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is a relatively safe procedure; however, no study has evaluated the safety of PEG tube placement in patients over the age of 100 years. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of patient records for patients who underwent PEG tube placement. Thirty patients aged 100 years and older were identified and a random sample of 275 patients was selected for comparison. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 80.6±16.2 years. No procedure-related deaths or major complications were identified; the overall inpatient mortality rate was 7.6%. Minor complications were noted in 4% (n=12) of the patients. Centenarian patients were predominantly female (80% [n=24] vs. 54% [n=147], p=0.006), with a mean age of 100.5±0.9 years. There was no significant difference in procedural success rates (93.3% vs. 97.4%, p=0.222) or inpatient mortality (6.7% [n=2] vs. 7.7% [n=21], p=1.000) between the two groups. However, a higher minor complication rate was noted in the older patients (13.3% [n=4] vs. 2.9% [n=8], p=0.022). CONCLUSIONS: Success rates, major complications and inpatient mortality associated with PEG tubes in patients aged over 100 years are comparable to those observed in relatively younger patients at our center; however minor complication rates are relatively higher. These findings lead us to believe that PEG tubes may be safely attempted in carefully selected patients in this subset of the population.
Aged, 80 and over
;
Female
;
Gastrostomy
;
Humans
;
Inpatients
;
Mortality
;
Retrospective Studies
2.Alveolar stability under different combinations of positive end-expiratory pressure and tidal volume: alveolar microscopy in isolated injured rat lungs.
Hui LIU ; Claudius A STAHL ; Knut MOELLER ; Matthias SCHNEIDER ; Steven GANZERT ; Zhan-qi ZHAO ; Xiao-wen TONG ; Josef GUTTMANN
Chinese Medical Journal 2010;123(4):406-411
BACKGROUNDHigh positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and low tidal volume (VT) ventilation is thought to be a protective ventilation strategy. It is hypothesized that the stabilization of collapsible alveoli during expiration contributes to lung protection. However, this hypothesis came from analysis of indirect indices like the analysis of the pressure-volume curve of the lung. The purpose of this study was to investigate isolated healthy and injured rat lungs by means of alveolar microscopy, in which combination of PEEP and VT is beneficial with respect to alveolar stability (I-E%).
METHODSAlveolar stability was investigated in isolated, non-perfused mechanically ventilated rat lungs. Injured lungs were compared with normal lungs. For both groups three PEEP settings (5, 10, 20 cmH2O) were combined with three VT settings (6, 10, 15 ml/kg) resulting in nine PEEP-VT combinations per group. Analysis was performed by alveolar microscopy.
RESULTSIn normal lungs alveolar stability persisted in all PEEP-VT combinations (I-E% (3.2 +/- 11.0)%). There was no significant difference using different settings (P > 0.01). In contrast, alveoli in injured lungs were extremely instable at PEEP levels of 5 cmH2O (mean I-E% 100%) and 10 cmH2O (mean I-E% (30.7 +/- 16.8)%); only at a PEEP of 20 cmH2O were alveoli stabilized (mean I-E% of (0.2 +/- 9.3)%).
CONCLUSIONSIn isolated healthy lungs alveolar stability is almost unaffected by different settings of PEEP and VT. In isolated injured lungs only a high PEEP level of 20 cmH2O resulted in stabilized alveoli whereas lower PEEP levels are associated with alveolar instability.
Animals ; Female ; Lung ; pathology ; Lung Injury ; pathology ; Microscopy ; Pulmonary Alveoli ; pathology ; Rats ; Rats, Wistar ; Tidal Volume ; physiology