Administration, Intranasal ; Safety ; Steroids ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects

The prolonged use of steroids, especially the topical administration of ccrticosteroid, will causes an intraocular pressure(IOP) devation in some patients with clinical finding that typically resemble primary open-angle glaucoma. The authors experienced a case of steroid-induced glaucoma following systemic and topical use of dexamethasone for seborrheic dermatitis of both eyelids 3 years previously. During the past few months patient had noted complete lloss of vision in right eye and decrease of vision considerably, in left eye and a trabeculectomy was done on the left eye. We report a case of steroid-induced glaucoma and the literatures were reviewed briefly.
Administration, Topical ; Dermatitis, Seborrheic ; Dexamethasone ; Eyelids ; Glaucoma* ; Glaucoma, Open-Angle ; Humans ; Steroids ; Trabeculectomy

Adult ; Exanthema ; diagnosis ; drug therapy ; etiology ; physiopathology ; Humans ; Male ; Pruritus ; physiopathology ; Steroids ; administration & dosage ; Treatment Outcome

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been changing the paradigm of cancer treatment. However, immune-related adverse effects (irAEs) have also increased with the exponential increase in the use of ICIs. ICIs can break up the immunologic homeostasis and reduce T-cell tolerance. Therefore, inhibition of immune checkpoint can lead to the activation of autoreactive T-cells, resulting in various irAEs similar to autoimmune diseases. Gastrointestinal toxicity, endocrine toxicity, and dermatologic toxicity are common side effects. Neurotoxicity, cardiotoxicity, and pulmonary toxicity are relatively rare but can be fatal. ICI-related gastrointestinal toxicity, dermatologic toxicity, and hypophysitis are more common with anti- CTLA-4 agents. ICI-related pulmonary toxicity, thyroid dysfunction, and myasthenia gravis are more common with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Treatment with systemic steroids is the principal strategy against irAEs. The use of immune-modulatory agents should be considered in case of no response to the steroid therapy. Treatment under the supervision of multidisciplinary specialists is also essential, because the symptoms and treatments of irAEs could involve many organs. Thus, this review focuses on the mechanism, clinical presentation, incidence, and treatment of various irAEs.
Autoimmune Diseases ; Cardiotoxicity ; Homeostasis ; Incidence ; Myasthenia Gravis ; Organization and Administration ; Specialization ; Steroids ; T-Lymphocytes ; Thyroid Gland

Idiopathic granulomatous mastitis (IGM) is a rare and chronic benign disease of the breast. Histologically, the disease presents as an intense inflammatory reaction with non-caseated granulomas that are the characteristic symptom of the disease. No consensus exists on the best treatment modality for this disease. In this report, we present a patient with granulomatous mastitis who was treated successfully with low-dose oral and topical steroids. Our aim here is to discuss various approaches for IGM in view of the literature and present treatment with topical steroids, which has not been reported.
Administration, Cutaneous ; Administration, Oral ; Adult ; Biopsy ; Female ; Granulomatous Mastitis/diagnosis/*drug therapy ; Humans ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Steroids/*administration & dosage ; Treatment Outcome

OBJECTIVE: To explore the treatment of sudden sensorineural hearing loss with steroid from different administration routes. METHOD: One hundred and eighty-eight patients with diagnosis of sudden sensorineural hearing loss were selected, in accordance with the random number table, and all patients were divided into three groups. With different administration routes, they were devided into systemic steroid therapy group, intratympanic steroid therapy group and postauricular steroid therapy group,and the curative effects were collected and analyzed. RESULT: The total effective rate was 78.26% in systemic steroid therapy group, 80.70% in intratympanic steroid therapy group and 80.65% in postauricularsteroid therapy group,and no statistical difference was detected among these three groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION The treatment of sudden sensorineural hearing loss with steroid from different adminsthation routes all can achieve a relatively favorable prognosis, and there were no obvious different among those different treatments.
Administration, Oral ; Audiometry, Pure-Tone ; Dexamethasone ; administration & dosage ; Glucocorticoids ; administration & dosage ; Hearing Loss, Sensorineural ; Hearing Loss, Sudden ; drug therapy ; Humans ; Prognosis ; Steroids ; Treatment Outcome ; Tympanic Membrane

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of glucocorticoid in initial treatment of sudden hearing loss with intratympanic (IT) and systemic ways. METHOD: We searched the database of PubMed, Cochrane, Embase,CBM, CNKI, VIP, Wanfang systematically. Literatures were screened according to the preestablished inclusion and exclusion standards,and all the RCT literatures associated with intratympanic and systemic glucocorticoid in the initial treatment of sudden hearing loss before may 2015 were collected. All the data, which meet the inclusion standards, were analyzed by using Meta-analysis software. RESULT: Among all the qualified literatures, 11 randomized controlled trials were included. A total of 1298 cases were involved, including 521 cases with intratympanic administration, 410 with IV-therapy, and 201 with oral therapy. Meta analysis results showed that there was significant difference of the total effective rate and improvement rate between the intratympanic and systemic administration. Intratympanic injection (P > 0.05) was more effective than systemic administration. There was no significant difference between intratympanic group and oral group (RR = 1.15, 95% CI: 0.92-1.42, P > 0.05). A significant difference of the effective rate occurred between intratympanic group and IV therapy group (RR = 1.17, 95% CI: 1.02-1.34, P < 0.05). The major complications of intratympanic were pain, dizziness/vertigo, which occurred more frequently than systemic therapy group; The major complications of systemic therapy group were hyperglycaemia, loss of appetite and insomnia. CONCLUSION This study shows that the intratympanic (IT) glucocorticoid for sudden deafness is more effective than the systemic administration. But it was not the first choice in clinical treatment. Further studies are warranted.
Administration, Oral ; Glucocorticoids ; administration & dosage ; therapeutic use ; Hearing Loss, Sudden ; drug therapy ; Humans ; Hyperglycemia ; Injection, Intratympanic ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Steroids ; administration & dosage ; therapeutic use ; Treatment Outcome

Administration, Oral ; Anti-Bacterial Agents ; administration & dosage ; Brimonidine Tartrate ; administration & dosage ; Diagnosis, Differential ; Doxycycline ; administration & dosage ; Face ; physiopathology ; Female ; Humans ; Inflammation ; Middle Aged ; Rosacea ; diagnosis ; drug therapy ; Singapore ; Steroids ; administration & dosage ; Treatment Outcome

PURPOSE: Although upper airway cough syndrome (UACS) is one of the most common causes of chronic cough, there are few reports on the effects of intranasal steroids (INS) on improvement of cough in patients with chronic cough caused by UACS. Here, we observed improvement in cough depending on prescribed medications, including INS, in patients with chronic cough caused exclusively by UACS in the clinical setting. METHODS: Patients with chronic cough caused exclusively by UACS were selected by the retrospective review of medical records. Durations and kinds of prescribed medications, nasal and postnasal drip symptoms, and results of paranasal sinus series at first visit were evaluated. According to the improvement of cough at the second visit, the patients were divided into the improved and unimproved groups. Odds ratios of each medication in the improved group were analyzed by logistic regression adjusted for age, sex, smoking history, duration of treatment, prescriptions of medications, presence of nasal and postnasal drip symptoms, and results of paranasal sinus series. RESULTS: A total of 122 patients with chronic cough caused exclusively by UACS were comprised of 38 patients in the improved group and 84 patients in the unimproved group. INS were prescribed to 45 patients, and the number of patients with INS prescription were significantly higher in the unimproved group than that in not-improved group (55.3% vs. 28.6%, P=0.008). The odds ratio of INS prescription was significantly higher in the improved group (odds ratio, 4.78; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-22.3; P=0.046). CONCLUSION: INS could improve cough symptom in patients with UACS. These results warrant further evaluation.
Administration, Intranasal ; Cough* ; Humans ; Logistic Models ; Medical Records ; Odds Ratio ; Prescriptions ; Retrospective Studies ; Sinusitis ; Smoke ; Smoking ; Steroids*

OBJECTIVEThis study was focused on the clinical effects of topical steroid for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) in Chinese adults.

METHODSThe CRS patients were randomly selected in the department of otorhinolaryngology, first affiliated hospital of Sun Yat-sen university between november 2010 and December 2011. Thirty-four CRS patients with polyps (CRSwNP) or CRS without polyps (CRSsNP), no prior surgeries were included. These patients were prescribed to use budesonide nasal spay for three months. Evaluation included visual analog score (VAS), sino-nasal outcome test-20(SNOT-20), CT scan (Lund-Mackay score). SPSS 16.0 software was used to analyze the data.

RESULTSFour patients were lost to follow up, while the other 30 patients finished the 3-months' follow up. Except for smelling disturbance which was not statistically changed (t = 0.902, P > 0.05), VAS for nasal blockage (baseline: 4.84 ± 3.15, after treatment: 2.26 ± 2.27), rhinorrhea (baseline: 6.03 ± 2.93, after treatment: 1.96 ± 2.23), headache (baseline: 1.68 ± 2.66, after treatment: 0.42 ± 0.95), facial pressure (baseline: 2.04 ± 2.97, after treatment: 0.58 ± 1.42) and general symptom (baseline: 6.00 ± 2.75, after treatment: 2.71 ± 1.90) were statistically decreased (t value was 4.386, 6.740, 2.445, 2.980, 6.989, respectively, all P < 0.05). VAS of nasal blockage, rhinorrhea and general symptom were statistically decreased after one-month's treatment (all P < 0.05), but no statistical improvements were observed between first, second and the third month (all P > 0.05). SNOT-20 was significantly decreased after treatment (t = 3.687, P < 0.01). 22.2% patients were cured on CT scan.

CONCLUSIONSTopical steroid improves objective symptoms and quality of life in CRS patients. Some of the patients can be cured in CT scores. The symptoms improvements begin from the first month, but do not change during the latter two months.

Administration, Intranasal ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Chronic Disease ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Sinusitis ; drug therapy ; Steroids ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Treatment Outcome ; Young Adult