1.How can a postgraduate professional education and development course benefit general practitioners?: a qualitative study.
Steven AGIUS ; Rebecca BARON ; Barry LEWIS ; Stephen LUCKHURST ; Mark SLOAN ; Thomas WARD
Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions 2015;12(1):31-
PURPOSE: The rationale for 'professional education and development' (PED) courses is to support general practitioners, enabling them to access a range of theoretical and practical skills within a supportive schema. It aims to identify whether and how a regional PED course has had a beneficial impact upon participants. METHODS: The study comprised a qualitative investigation of participants' assessed coursework portfolios. The content of each portfolio gives individual accounts of the impact of the course on personal and practice development. Permission to access extant portfolios was obtained from 16 recent alumni of the course. The anonymous written material was analysed by the research team for recurring discourses and themes using a thematic framework analysis. RESULTS: Seven major thematic categories were extrapolated from the data: leadership, resilience, quality improvement, change management, development of new services, educational expertise, and patient safety. In each category, we found evidence that the course enabled development of practitioners by enhancing knowledge and skills which had a positive impact upon their self-perceived effectiveness and motivation. CONCLUSION: Extended specialty training is on the horizon but such courses may still serve a valuable purpose for current trainees and the existing general practitioners workforce which will be responsible for leading the shift towards community-based service delivery.
Anonyms and Pseudonyms
;
Education
;
Education, Professional*
;
General Practitioners*
;
Humans
;
Leadership
;
Motivation
;
Patient Safety
;
Quality Improvement
2.Patients with computed tomography-proven acute diverticulitis require follow-up to exclude colorectal cancer.
Shafquat ZAMAN ; Warren CHAPMAN ; Imtiyaz MOHAMMED ; Kathryn GILL ; Stephen Thomas WARD
Intestinal Research 2017;15(2):195-202
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Traditionally, patients with acute diverticulitis undergo follow-up endoscopy to exclude colorectal cancer (CRC). However, its usefulness has been debated in this era of high-resolution computed tomography (CT) diagnosis. We assessed the frequency and outcome of endoscopic follow-up for patients with CT-proven acute diverticulitis, according to the confidence in the CT diagnosis. METHODS: Records of patients with CT-proven acute diverticulitis between October 2007 and March 2014 at Sandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust were retrieved. The National Cancer Registry confirmed the cases of CRC. Endoscopy quality indicators were compared between these patients and other patients undergoing the same endoscopic examination over the same period. RESULTS: We identified 235 patients with CT-proven acute diverticulitis, of which, 187 were managed conservatively. The CT report was confident of the diagnosis of acute diverticulitis in 75% cases. Five of the 235 patients were subsequently diagnosed with CRC (2.1%). Three cases of CRC were detected in the 187 patients managed conservatively (1.6%). Forty-eight percent of the conservatively managed patients underwent follow-up endoscopy; one case of CRC was identified. Endoscopies were often incomplete and caused more discomfort for patients with diverticulitis compared with controls. CONCLUSIONS: CRC was diagnosed in patients with CT-proven diverticulitis at a higher rate than in screened asymptomatic populations, necessitating follow-up. CT reports contained statements regarding diagnostic uncertainty in 25% cases, associated with an increased risk of CRC. Follow-up endoscopy in patients with CT-proven diverticulitis is associated with increased discomfort and high rates of incompletion. The use of other follow-up modalities should be considered.
Colorectal Neoplasms*
;
Diagnosis
;
Diverticulitis*
;
Endoscopy
;
Follow-Up Studies*
;
Humans
;
Uncertainty