OBJECTIVE: To compare the sagittal morphological features of the spine and pelvis between L₅S₁ dysplastic spondylolisthesis and isthmus spondylolisthesis in adolescent. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 24 cases of adolescent L₅S₁ spondylolisthesis with complete imaging data from May 2002 to December 2016. Those included 8 males and 16 females, aged from 10 to 18 years old with an average of (13.4±2.0) years. Among them, 9 cases were diagnosed as dysplastic spondylolisthesis (dysplasia group) and 15 cases isthmic spondylolisthesis (ischemic group). Radiographic parameters including slippage distance, slippage degree, slippage angle, sagittal vertical axis(SVA), thoracic kyphosis(TK), lumbar lordosis(LL), L₅ incidence(L₅I), pelvic incidence(PI), pelvic tilt(PT), sacral slope(SS), sagittal pelvic thickness(SPT), lumbosacral angle (LSA), sacral table angle (STA) were measured on the spinal lateral X-ray of the standing position. Independent-samples t-test was used in the comparison of each variable between two groups. <0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in slippage distance, slippage rate, slippage angle between two groups. In dysplasia group, SVA, L₅I, PT, SPT were (37.0±48.4) mm, (57.0±14.8)°, (42.3±15.4)°, (56.1±21.2) mm, respectively, and (-11.0±22.2) mm, (31.7±19.3) °, ( 15.5±10.2)°, (31.4±19.1) mm in ischemic group; and the differences between the two groups were significant(<0.05). In ischemic group, SS, LSA, STA were (44.1±12.6)°, (103.9±21.7)°, (92.7±9.9)°, respectively, and (25.9±20.2) °, (75.4±16.4) °, (75.4±9.7) ° in dysplasia group; and the differences between the two groups were significant(<0.05). There was no significant difference in TK, LL between two groups(>0.05). CONCLUSIONS Significant different from isthmic spondylolisthesis, adolescents with dysplastic spondylolisthesis present a different spino-pelvic sagittal alignment, characterized with trunk forward leaning and pelvic retroversion. In case of sagittal imbalance, early surgical intervention is required to restore a balanced spino-pelvic alignment.
Adolescent ; Child ; Female ; Humans ; Lumbar Vertebrae ; Male ; Pelvis ; Postural Balance ; Radiography ; Retrospective Studies ; Spine ; Spondylolisthesis ; surgery

There have been many reports regarding various operative methods for spondylolytic spondylolisthesis. However, there have been no reports regarding the comparison between posterolateral fusion (PLF) with pedicle screw fixation (PSF) and anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) with PSF. The purpose of the current study was to compare the clinical outcomes of PLF with PSF and ALIF with PSF, and to help in the selection of treatment options. Fifty-six patients with spondylolytic spondylolisthesis who underwent PLF with PSF (group 1, 35 patients) or who underwent ALIF with PSF (group 2, 21 patients) were studied. Minimum follow-up was 2 years. Demographic variables and disease state were similar for the two groups. We studied operating time, amount of blood loss, duration of hospital stay, clinical outcomes, complications, time at which fusion was complete, fusion rate, and radiological measurements. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of the amount of blood loss, duration of hospital stay, back pain, radiating pain, fusion rate, or complication rate. However, in group 2, the operation time and the time at which fusion became complete was longer, and in group 1 there was significant radiological reduction loss. In conclusion, PLF with PSF was just as effective as ALIF with PSF in terms of clinical outcomes, but ALIF with PSF was superior to PLF with PSF in terms of the prevention of reduction loss. Anterior support would be helpful for preventing reduction loss in cases of spondylolytic spondylolisthesis of the lumbar spine.
Adolescence ; Adult ; Aged ; *Bone Screws ; Comparative Study ; Female ; Human ; Male ; Middle Age ; Postoperative Complications ; Spinal Fusion/*methods ; Spondylolisthesis/radiography/*surgery

BACKGROUND: To assess the radiographic results in patients who underwent transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), particularly the changes in segmental lordosis in the fusion segment, whole lumbar lordosis and disc height. METHODS: Twenty six cases of single-level TLIF in degenerative lumbar diseases were analyzed. The changes in segmental lordosis, whole lumbar lordosis, and disc height were evaluated before surgery, after surgery and at the final follow-up. RESULTS: The segmental lordosis increased significantly after surgery but decreased at the final follow-up. Compared to the preoperative values, the segmental lordosis did not change significantly at the final follow-up. Whole lumbar lordosis at the final follow-up was significantly higher than the preoperative values. The disc height was significantly higher in after surgery than before surgery (p = 0.000) and the disc height alter surgery and at the final follow-up was similar. CONCLUSIONS: When performing TLIF, careful surgical techniques and attention are needed to restore and maintain the segmental lordosis at the fusion level.
Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Female ; Humans ; Intervertebral Disk Degeneration/*surgery ; Lordosis/*radiography ; Lumbar Vertebrae/pathology/*radiography/surgery ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Prosthesis Implantation ; Retrospective Studies ; *Spinal Fusion ; Spinal Stenosis/surgery ; Spondylolisthesis/surgery

BACKGROUNDThe treatment of high-grade developmental spondylolisthesis (HGDS) is still challenging and controversial. In this study, we investigated the efficacy of the posterior reduction and monosegmental fusion assisted by intraoperative three-dimensional (3D) navigation system in managing the HGDS.

METHODSThirteen consecutive HGDS patients were treated with posterior decompression, reduction and monosegmental fusion of L5/S1, assisted by intraoperative 3D navigation system. The clinical and radiographic outcomes were evaluated, with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. The differences between the pre- and post-operative measures were statistically analyzed using a two-tailed, paired t-test.

RESULTSAt most recent follow-up, 12 patients were pain-free. Only 1 patient had moderate pain. There were no permanent neurological complications or pseudarthrosis. The magnetic resonance imaging showed that there was no obvious disc degeneration in the adjacent segment. All radiographic parameters were improved. Mean slippage improved from 63.2% before surgery to 12.2% after surgery and 11.0% at latest follow-up. Lumbar lordosis changed from preoperative 34.9 ± 13.3° to postoperative 50.4 ± 9.9°, and 49.3 ± 7.8° at last follow-up. L5 incidence improved from 71.0 ± 11.3° to 54.0 ± 11.9° and did not change significantly at the last follow-up 53.1 ± 15.4°. While pelvic incidence remained unchanged, sacral slip significantly decreased from preoperative 32.7 ± 12.5° to postoperative 42.6 ± 9.8°and remained constant to the last follow-up 44.4 ± 6.9°. Pelvic tilt significantly decreased from 38.4 ± 12.5° to 30.9 ± 8.1° and remained unchanged at the last follow-up 28.1 ± 11.2°.

CONCLUSIONSPosterior reduction and monosegmental fusion of L5/S1 assisted by intraoperative 3D navigation are an effective technique for managing high-grade dysplastic spondylolisthesis. A complete reduction of local deformity and excellent correction of overall sagittal balance can be achieved.

Adolescent ; Adult ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Decompression, Surgical ; methods ; Female ; Humans ; Lumbar Vertebrae ; surgery ; Male ; Radiography ; Spinal Fusion ; methods ; Spondylolisthesis ; diagnostic imaging ; surgery ; Young Adult

OBJECTIVETo evaluate the outcome of two methods for stabilization and fusion: posterolateral fusion and circumferential fusion involving posterior lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar stenosis with Grades 1 and 2 lumbar spondylolisthesis.

METHODSFrom April 1998 to April 2003, 45 patients suffering from lumbar stenosis with low degree lumbar spondylolisthesis treated in our hospital were retrospectively reviewed and assigned to two groups. Among them, 24 patients (group A) were treated with instrumented posterolateral fusion and 21 patients (group B) with instrumented circumferential fusion. The two groups were compared for clinical and radiological outcomes.

RESULTSAll patients were followed up for 12 to 72 months. In group A, results showed preoperative clinical symptoms disappeared completely in 12 of 24 patients, and pain relief was seen in 91.7% (22/24). Two cases suffered from residual symptoms. Twenty-two cases obtained complete reduction of olisthy vertebral bodies, and anatomical reduction rate was 91.7%. No infection or neurological complication occurred in this group. In group B, results showed preoperative clinical symptoms disappeared completely in 13 of 21 patients, and pain relief was seen in 90.5% (19/21). One case suffered from residual symptoms. Twenty cases obtained complete reduction of the olisthy vertebral bodies, and anatomical reduction rate was 95.2%. Four cases of infection or neurological complication occurred in this group. Both groups indicated no significant difference in clinical outcomes and anatomical reduction rate during follow-up. But group A had better intraoperative circumstances and postoperative outcome than group B, while group B had better postoperative parameters in X-ray of Angle of Slipping and Disc Index than group A.

CONCLUSIONSThe first choice of surgical method for lumbar stenosis with low degree lumbar spondylolisthesis is instrumented posterolateral fusion. Only when patients suffer from severe preoperative disc degeneration and low back pain or intervertebral instability should we consider indications for additional use of CAGE.

Adult ; Aged ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Lumbar Vertebrae ; surgery ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Radiography ; Retrospective Studies ; Spinal Fusion ; methods ; Spinal Stenosis ; diagnostic imaging ; pathology ; surgery ; Spondylolisthesis ; diagnostic imaging ; pathology ; surgery ; Treatment Outcome

BACKGROUND: We retrospectively evaluated the clinical and radiological outcomes of posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) with using a unilateral single cage and a local morselized bone graft. METHODS: Fifty three patients who underwent PLIF with a unilateral single cage filled with local morselized bone graft were enrolled in this study. The average follow-up duration was 31.1 months. The clinical outcomes were evaluated with using the visual analogue scale (VAS) at the pre-operative period, at 1 year post-operation and at the last follow-up, the Oswestry Disability Index, the Prolo scale and the Kim & Kim criteria at the last follow-up; the radiological outcomes were evaluated according to the change of bone bridging, the radiolucency, the instablity and the disc height. RESULTS: For the clinical evaluation, the VAS pain index, the Oswestry Disability Index, the Prolo scale and the Kim & Kim criteria showed excellent outcomes. For the the radiological evaluation, 52 cases showed complete bone union at the last follow-up. Regarding the complications, only 1 patient had cage breakage during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: PLIF using a unilateral single cage filled with a local morselized bone graft has the advantages of a shorter operation time, less blood loss and a shorter hospital stay, as compared with the PLIF using bilateral cages, for treating degenerative lumbar spine disease. This technique also provides excellent outcomes according to the clinical and radiological evaluation.
Adult ; Aged ; Blood Loss, Surgical ; Bone Transplantation/*methods ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Intervertebral Disk Degeneration/*radiography/*surgery ; Lumbar Vertebrae/pathology/*radiography/*surgery ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Prosthesis Implantation/methods ; Retrospective Studies ; Spinal Fusion/*methods ; Spinal Stenosis/surgery ; Spondylolisthesis/surgery ; Time and Motion Studies ; Treatment Outcome

OBJECTIVESTo find out the radiologic factors predicting the outcomes of reduction of lumbar spondylolisthesis.

METHODSForty two patients were treated with pedicle screw fixation with posterolateral fusion because of lumbar spondylolisthesis, with the average age of 56.0 years. There were 11 males and 31 females; 20 degenerative spondylolisthesis cases, and 22 isthmic spondylolisthesis cases; 1 L(3,4) case, 26 L(4,5) cases and 25 L(5)S(1) cases; 23 grade I patients and 19 grade II ones. All patients were taken the X-ray examination before operation and one week after operation. Measurements of slip ratio, percentage disc height, slip angle, lumbar lordosis angle and sacral slope angle were based on pre-operation X-rays. Measurements of the post-operation slip ratio were based on post-operation X-rays. Multivariate regression analysis was used to analysis the correlation between reduction ratio and pre-operation slip ratio, slip angle, percentage of disc height, lumbar lordosis angle and sacral slope angle.

RESULTSThe average pre-operation slip ratio was (22.5 +/- 10.6)%. The pre-operation percentage disc height was 0.23 +/- 0.10, the slip angle was 4.4 degrees +/- 5.4 degrees , the lumbar lordosis angle was 43 degrees +/- 13 degrees and the sacral slope angle was 34 degrees +/- 10 degrees . The reduction ratio was (63.2 +/- 27.9)%. No correlation was found among reduction ratio with pre-operation slip ratio, slip angle and sacral slope angle, but a positive correlation between reduction ratio and the pre-operation percentage of disc height (P < 0.05), a positive correlation between reduction ratio and the pre-operation lumbar lordosis angle (P < 0.05) was found.

CONCLUSIONThe percentage disc height and the lumbar lordosis angle can predict the outcomes of reduction of lumbar spondylolisthesis.

Adult ; Aged ; Bone Screws ; Female ; Fracture Fixation, Internal ; Humans ; Lumbar Vertebrae ; diagnostic imaging ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Multivariate Analysis ; Radiography ; Regression Analysis ; Spinal Fusion ; Spondylolisthesis ; diagnostic imaging ; surgery ; Treatment Outcome