Humans ; Lumbar Vertebrae ; surgery ; Spinal Stenosis ; complications ; surgery

BACKGROUND: A systematic literature review of interspinous dynamic stabilization, including DIAM, Wallis, Coflex, and X-STOP, was conducted to assess its safety and efficacy. METHODS: The search was done in Korean and English, by using eight domestic databases which included KoreaMed and international databases, such as Ovid Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. A total of 306 articles were identified, but the animal studies, preclinical studies, and studies that reported the same results were excluded. As a result, a total of 286 articles were excluded and the remaining 20 were included in the final assessment. Two assessors independently extracted data from these articles using predetermined selection criteria. Qualities of the articles included were assessed using Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN). RESULTS: The complication rate of interspinous dynamic stabilization has been reported to be 0% to 32.3% in 3- to 41-month follow-up studies. The complication rate of combined interspinous dynamic stabilization and decompression treatment (32.3%) was greater than that of decompression alone (6.5%), but no complication that significantly affected treatment results was found. Interspinous dynamic stabilization produced slightly better clinical outcomes than conservative treatments for spinal stenosis. Good outcomes were also obtained in single-group studies. No significant difference in treatment outcomes was found, and the studies compared interspinous dynamic stabilization with decompression or fusion alone. CONCLUSIONS: No particular problem was found regarding the safety of the technique. Its clinical outcomes were similar to those of conventional techniques, and no additional clinical advantage could be attributed to interspinous dynamic stabilization. However, few studies have been conducted on the long-term efficacy of interspinous dynamic stabilization. Thus, the authors suggest further clinical studies be conducted to validate the theoretical advantages and clinical efficacy of this technique.
Decompression, Surgical ; Humans ; Postoperative Complications ; *Spinal Fusion/adverse effects/methods ; Spinal Stenosis/physiopathology/surgery

OBJECTIVETo investigate the clinical results of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) for lumbar spinal stenosis with lumbar instability.

METHODSRetrospective study was done on 42 cases of lumbar spinal stenosis with lumbar instability treated with bilateral decompression via unilateral approach and MIS-TLIF through an expandable tubular retractor from March 2010 to January 2011. There were 18 males and 24 females, and mean age was 61.7 years (rang, 48 - 79 years). The level of surgery was L(3-4) in 4 patients, L(4-5) in 26 patients, and L(5)-S(1) in 12 patients. All patients had symptoms of intermittent claudication. And 24 patients had symptoms of lower extremity pain and numbness in one side, and 18 patients had same symptoms in both legs. Operation time, intra-operative bleeding, postoperative hospital stay and complications were recorded. Visual analogue scale (VAS) scores for low back pain and leg pain were recorded before and after surgery. Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores were also recorded before and after surgery. The Bridwell criterion was used for evaluating the interbody fusion, and the MacNab criterion was used for assessment after surgery.

RESULTSThe mean operative time was 150.4 minutes (range, 120 - 170 minutes), and mean blood loss was 147.1 ml (range, 50 - 400 ml). The hospitalization time after surgery was 5 - 18 d, an average of 8.8 d. All cases were followed-up for 6 - 14 months (average 11 months). VAS score of low back pain before surgery was 7.3 ± 1.0, and were 2.9 ± 0.8 and 2.0 ± 0.8 at three months after surgery and the last follow-up respectively. VAS score of leg pain before surgery was 7.9 ± 0.7, and were 2.0 ± 0.5 and 1.0 ± 0.7 at three months after surgery and the last follow-up respectively. ODI score was 75% ± 6% before surgery, were 16% ± 6% and 12% ± 5% at three months after surgery and the last follow-up respectively. VAS and ODI scores showed statistically significant improvements (t = 3.110 - 56.323, P < 0.01). There were 40 cases were grade I and II, according to the Bridwell criteria. The clinical results were excellent in 16 cases, good in 22 cases and fair in 4 cases to the MacNab criteria at the final follow-up.

CONCLUSIONSMIS-TLIF is an ideal surgical method for single segment lumbar spinal stenosis with lumbar instability, but close attention should be paid to specific patients, surgeons and hospitals.

Aged ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Lumbar Vertebrae ; surgery ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures ; Retrospective Studies ; Spinal Diseases ; surgery ; Spinal Fusion ; methods ; Spinal Stenosis ; complications ; surgery

OBJECTIVETo compare and evaluate instrumented posterior fusion with instrumented circumferential lumbar fusion in the treatment of lumbar stenosis with low degree lumbar spondylolisthesis.

METHODSFrom April 1998 to April 2003, 45 patients who suffered from lumbar stenosis with low degree lumbar spondylolisthesis were divided into 2 groups (A and B) at random. The patients in group A (n = 24, average age 54 years old) were performed decompressive laminectomy, intertransverse process arthrodesis with bone grafting and transpedicle instrumentation of solid connection (SOCON) system. The patients in group B (n = 21, average age 53 years old) were performed the same procedure as group A except adding posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PROSPACE). The main levels of lumbar spondylolisthesis in 2 groups was L(4 - 5) or L(5)-S(1). All cases were classified as degree 1 to degree 2. All patients in the two groups received preoperative myelography or CTM, and were diagnosed lateral recess stenosis and(or) central lumbar canal stenosis.

RESULTSAll the patients were followed up from 12 to 72 months. In group A, the results showed that the preoperative clinical symptoms disappeared completely in 12 of 24 patients, pain relief was seen in 91.7% (22/24), anatomical reduction rate was 91.7%. No infection or neurologic complication occurred in this series. In group B, the results showed that the preoperative clinical symptoms disappeared completely in 13 of 21 patients, pain relief was seen in 90.5% (19/21), anatomical reduction rate was 95.2%. Four cases of infection or neurologic complication occurred in this series. Two groups had no significant difference in follow-up clinical outcome and anatomical reduction rate. But group A had better intraoperative circumstances and postoperative outcome than group B, group B had better postoperative parameters in X-ray of angle of slipping and disc index than group A.

CONCLUSIONSThe best surgical treatment method of lumbar stenosis with low degree lumbar spondylolisthesis is complete intraoperative decompressive laminectomy, reduction with excellent transpedicle system instrumentation and solid fusion after bone grafting. The use of cage should be conformed to strict indications.

Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Female ; Humans ; Laminectomy ; Lumbar Vertebrae ; surgery ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Retrospective Studies ; Spinal Fusion ; methods ; Spinal Stenosis ; complications ; surgery ; Spondylolysis ; complications ; surgery ; Treatment Outcome

OBJECTIVETo evaluate and compare the efficacy and clinical results of cervical expansive open door laminoplasty (EOLP) with different hinge position.

METHODSFrom February 2006 to February 2007, a total of 102 cases with cervical spondylotic myelopathy were assessed in this randomized controlled trial. Fifty-seven patients underwent EOLP with the hinge located at the inner margin of the lateral mass classified as wide-open group. Forty-five cases who underwent EOLP with the hinge positioned at the lamina margin served as narrow-open group. The clinical results and radiological examinations of both groups were evaluated 24 months after surgery.

RESULTSThere were no significant differences in operation time, bleeding quantity and recovery rate of Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores. The incidence of C(5) palsy and severity of axial symptoms in the wide-open group were significantly lower than those in the narrow-open group (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in cervical curvature index and range of motion between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONSWell-suited and appropriated inwardly shift the hinge could promote clinical outcomes after EOLP, especially decrease the incidence of the C(5) palsy and the severity of axial symptom, but it is contraindication for patients with ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament, ossification of ligament flavum and fluorosis cervical stenosis.

Aged ; Cervical Vertebrae ; surgery ; Decompression, Surgical ; methods ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Spinal Osteophytosis ; complications ; surgery ; Spinal Stenosis ; complications ; surgery ; Treatment Outcome

Adult ; Aged ; Female ; Humans ; Joint Instability ; complications ; diagnosis ; physiopathology ; surgery ; Lumbar Vertebrae ; pathology ; physiopathology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Spinal Canal ; pathology ; physiopathology ; Spinal Stenosis ; complications ; diagnosis ; physiopathology ; surgery

OBJECTIVESTo assess surgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis associated with unstable degenerative spondylolisthesis.

METHODSIn 86 patients with lumbar spinal stenosis associated with unstable degenerative spondylolisthesis. (30 men and 56 women, aged from 30 to 77 years), 63 patients complained of lower back pain with both lower extremity pain, 10 patients pain in one leg, and 13 patients only lower back pain. Seventy-two of these patients complained of intermittent claudication, with a walking distance ranging from 10 to 1 000 m. Thirty-two patients had some changes in sensation, motion and reflexes of the foot. According to White' critera, all patients showed dynamic instability of the lesion. Meyerding criteria showed degree 1 in 79 patients, and degree 2 in 7. CT scan was made in 56 patients, MRI in 24 and MRM in 6 before operation. Myelography was performed in 61 patients, and CTM in 6. Stenosis and spondylolisthesis located between L(4) and L(5) in 49 patients, between L(3) and L(4) in 6, between L(5) and S(1) in 25, between L(3) and L(4) and between L(4) and L(5) in 2, and from L(3) to S(1) in 4. The patients with pathological spondylolisthesis were excluded. Lateral recess stenosis of one leg was observed in 10 patients, lateral recess of both legs in 22, and central canal stenosis in 54, of whom 12 patients were associated with protrusion of the lumbar disc. Decompression and autograft with iliac bone and various internal fixation were performed in all patients.

RESULTSThe patients were followed up from 8 months to 13 years, longer than 1 year (average 5.6 years) in 81 patients. According to Amundsen et al, excellent results were obtained in 78 patients, good in 5, and fair in 3. Spondylolisthesis was completely reduced in 70 patients of degree 1 (89.9%), and in 6 patients of degree 2 (85.7%). No patient showed slippage aggravated. 74 patients gained bone graft fusion within 3 months and 10 patients within 6 months. Two patients showed pseudoarthrosis during the follow-up. Complications included internal fixation breakage in 1 patient, and delayed infection in 1.

CONCLUSIONSComplete decompression and bone graft fusion are the key to treatment. Decompression and internal fixation improve the symptoms of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis associated with spondylolisthesis. Transpedicle instrumentation can reduce spondylolisthesis and maintain the physical curve of the lumbar.

Adult ; Aged ; Decompression, Surgical ; methods ; Female ; Humans ; Lumbar Vertebrae ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Retrospective Studies ; Spinal Stenosis ; complications ; surgery ; Spondylolisthesis ; surgery

Spinal instrumentation is a common method for the treatment of spinal disorders, but it can lead to the changes of spine biomechanics. Because of the stress changes, accelerated degeneration of the adjacent segment may occur as time goes by, namely adjacent segment disease. The accelerated degeneration can lead to secondary spinal stenosis, articulated joint degeneration, acquired spondylolisthesis, and spine instability, and some patients may have to receive surgery again. In recent years, the researchers gradually recognized the importance of this disease, and began to investigate its pathogenesis and management.
Humans ; Joint Instability ; etiology ; prevention & control ; Postoperative Complications ; diagnosis ; prevention & control ; Spinal Diseases ; surgery ; Spinal Fusion ; adverse effects ; instrumentation ; Spinal Stenosis ; etiology ; prevention & control ; Spondylolisthesis ; etiology ; prevention & control

BACKGROUND: There are few studies about risk factors for poor outcomes from multi-level lumbar posterolateral fusion limited to three or four level lumbar posterolateral fusions. The purpose of this study was to analyze the outcomes of multi-level lumbar posterolateral fusion and to search for possible risk factors for poor surgical outcomes. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 37 consecutive patients who underwent multi-level lumbar or lumbosacral posterolateral fusion with posterior instrumentation. The outcomes were deemed either 'good' or 'bad' based on clinical and radiological results. Many demographic and radiological factors were analyzed to examine potential risk factors for poor outcomes. Student t-test, Fisher exact test, and the chi-square test were used based on the nature of the variables. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to exclude confounding factors. RESULTS: Twenty cases showed a good outcome (group A, 54.1%) and 17 cases showed a bad outcome (group B, 45.9%). The overall fusion rate was 70.3%. The revision procedures (group A: 1/20, 5.0%; group B: 4/17, 23.5%), proximal fusion to L2 (group A: 5/20, 25.0%; group B: 10/17, 58.8%), and severity of stenosis (group A: 12/19, 63.3%; group B: 3/11, 27.3%) were adopted as possible related factors to the outcome in univariate analysis. Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that only the proximal fusion level (superior instrumented vertebra, SIV) was a significant risk factor. The cases in which SIV was L2 showed inferior outcomes than those in which SIV was L3. The odds ratio was 6.562 (95% confidence interval, 1.259 to 34.203). CONCLUSIONS: The overall outcome of multi-level lumbar or lumbosacral posterolateral fusion was not as high as we had hoped it would be. Whether the SIV was L2 or L3 was the only significant risk factor identified for poor outcomes in multi-level lumbar or lumbosacral posterolateral fusion in the current study. Thus, the authors recommend that proximal fusion levels be carefully determined when multi-level lumbar fusions are considered.
Aged ; Female ; Humans ; Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery ; Lumbosacral Region ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Scoliosis/complications/surgery ; Spinal Fusion/methods ; Spinal Stenosis/complications/diagnosis/*surgery ; Spondylolisthesis/complications/surgery ; Treatment Outcome

OBJECTIVETo study surgical techniques for degenerative lumbar scoliosis associated with lumbar stenosis and evaluate their clinical significane.

METHODSThirty-two patients with degenerative lumbar scoliosis associated with spinal stenosis were treated by techniques of posterior lumbar interbody fusion or posterolateral fusion and pedicle screws. There were 18 male and 14 female with 56.8 years old on the average (ranging from 49 to 75 years). There were no evident change of lumberlordosis in 15 cases, and lumber lordosis were obvious loss associated with lumbar subluxation in 17 cases. The correcting, the improvement of back and leg pain, complications and followed-up results were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTSThirty-two cases were followed-up for 6 to 39 months (the average time of 13 months). The average correction rate of scoliosis was 58.0% and the rate of pain relief was (80.2 +/- 5.8)%. There were two cases of dura sac laceration, two cases of nerve roots injury and a case of pseudoarthritis. During followed-up, correction rate and height of disc spaces were not lost. Shift of interbody cages were no displaced; all the internal fixation got well fusion and the rate of fusion for the bone graft was 96.9%.

CONCLUSIONPosterior pedicle screws combined with interbody fusion or posterolateral fusion is a safe and effective surgical treatment for degenerative lumbar scoliosis associated with lumbar stenosis.

Aged ; Bone Screws ; Female ; Fracture Fixation, Internal ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Retrospective Studies ; Scoliosis ; surgery ; Spinal Fusion ; Spinal Stenosis ; complications ; surgery ; Treatment Outcome