1.Submicroscopic Deletions of Immunoglobulin Heavy Chain Gene (IGH) in Precursor B Lymphoblastic Leukemia with IGH Rearrangements.
Jungwon HUH ; Yeung Chul MUN ; Eun Sun YOO ; Chu Myong SEONG ; Wha Soon CHUNG
Annals of Laboratory Medicine 2015;35(1):128-131
Translocations leading to fusions between the immunoglobulin heavy chain gene (IGH) and various partner genes have been reported in B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). However, submicroscopic deletions within IGH in B-ALL have not been rigorously assessed. In this study, we investigated characteristics of IGH submicroscopic deletions, by FISH, in B-ALL with IGH rearrangements. FISH was performed by using commercially available IGH dual-color break-apart rearrangement probes (Abbott/Vysis, Downers Grove, IL, USA; Kreatech, Amsterdam, Netherlands). The study group included seven B-ALL patients with IGH rearrangements, observed by FISH. Among them, two exhibited deletion of the 5' variable region of IGH by FISH. The B-ALL in these two patients included two kinds of abnormal cells; one had an IGH rearrangement without any IGH submicroscopic deletion, while the other had an IGH submicroscopic deletion, which showed that one normal fusion signal and one 3' IGH signal were detected. Thus, submicroscopic deletion of the IGH 5' variable region may have occurred in either the native or rearranged chromosome 14. These findings indicate that B-ALL with IGH rearrangements may be accompanied by submicroscopic deletions of the IGH 5' variable region, which can be detected by FISH. The clinical significance of such deletions is unclear, but the loss of part of the IGH gene in B-ALL warrants further study.
Adult
;
Child
;
Female
;
*Gene Deletion
;
*Gene Rearrangement
;
Humans
;
Immunoglobulin Heavy Chains/*genetics
;
In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence
;
Infant
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
Precursor B-Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/*genetics/pathology
;
Young Adult
2.Chromothripsis Identified by Copy Number Profiling in a Case of Plasma Cell Leukaemia.
Min Ji SOHN ; Yeung Chul MUN ; Chu Myong SEONG ; Wha Soon CHUNG ; Jungwon HUH
Journal of Laboratory Medicine and Quality Assurance 2014;36(2):107-112
A genomic instability called chromothripsis occurs as a single catastrophic event, generating massive complex genomic rearrangement with a possible characteristic pattern of copy number oscillations. Here, we report a case of secondary plasma cell leukaemia (PCL) showing chromothripsis identified by single nucleotide polymorphism array (SNP-A)-based karyotyping. A 53-year-old male patient was diagnosed as having secondary PCL four years after he was diagnosed with multiple myeloma, and he died four days later due to intracerebral haemorrhage. Chromosomal analysis and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) revealed the deletions of 13q and 17p and an insertion of 1q. Further, genomic aberrations that were not detected by chromosomal analysis and FISH were identified by SNP-A. In particular, SNP-A revealed numerous alternating copy number state switches involving one, two, or three copy number states on chromosome 7q, suggesting the presence of chromothripsis. The present case suggests that chromothripsis may occur in secondary PCL and can be inferred from genomic copy number profiles identified by SNP-A.
Fluorescence
;
Genomic Instability
;
Humans
;
In Situ Hybridization
;
Karyotyping
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
Multiple Myeloma
;
Plasma Cells*
;
Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide
3.Cytomegalovirus esophagitis presents as chest pain in a renal transplant recipient.
Young Bin JOO ; Hong Soon JUNG ; Myong Ki BAEG ; Wook Hyun LEE ; Hwa Jeong LEE ; Chul Woo YANG
The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine 2013;28(4):497-499
No abstract available.
Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use
;
Biopsy
;
Chest Pain/diagnosis/*etiology
;
Cytomegalovirus/*isolation & purification
;
Cytomegalovirus Infections/diagnosis/drug therapy/*virology
;
Esophagitis/diagnosis/drug therapy/*virology
;
Esophagoscopy
;
Ganciclovir/therapeutic use
;
Humans
;
Kidney Transplantation/*adverse effects
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
Opportunistic Infections/diagnosis/drug therapy/*virology
;
Treatment Outcome
4.An unrelated Clone of 20q Deletion Following Successful Treatment of Leukemia in Patients with t(8;21), t(15;17) or t(9;22).
Chorong HAHM ; Yeung Chul MUN ; Chu Myong SEONG ; Wha Soon CHUNG ; Jungwon HUH
Journal of Laboratory Medicine and Quality Assurance 2012;34(2):107-111
Cases of clonal cytogenetic abnormalities in Philadelphia-negative cells during the treatment of Philadelphia-positive CML have been previously reported. However, clonal abnormalities unrelated to the original t(8;21) or t(15;17) karyotype are not common. Deletion of 20q (del(20q)) is one of the most common recurrent cytogenetic abnormalities in myeloid neoplasms. Here we describe 3 patients with t(8;21), t(15;17), or t(9;22) who developed unrelated del(20q) after successful treatment of leukemia. We retrospectively reviewed the cytogenetic results of 23 AML patients with t(8;21)(q22;q22), 28 AML patients with t(15;17)(q22;q12), and 47 CML patients with t(9;22)(q34;q11.2). We identified 3 patients with del(20q) as the only clonal aberration unrelated to the primary karyotype when they achieved complete morphologic and cytogenetic remission. The latency period between diagnosis and emergence of del(20q) was 1, 114, and 35 months for the 3 patients, respectively. There was no evidence of therapy-related MDS/AML during the follow-up period. In 1 AML patient with t(8;21), relapse occurred in a t(8;21)(q22;q22) clone and the del(20q) clones were lost. The clinical significance of del(20q) as an unrelated clonal aberration is unknown, but our study suggests that del(20q) does not cause therapy-related MDS/AML or indicate disease progression.
Chromosome Aberrations
;
Chromosome Deletion
;
Chromosomes, Human, Pair 20
;
Clone Cells
;
Cytogenetics
;
Disease Progression
;
Follow-Up Studies
;
Humans
;
Karyotype
;
Latency Period (Psychology)
;
Leukemia
;
Recurrence
;
Retrospective Studies
5.Additional Genomic Aberrations Identified by Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Array-Based Karyotyping in an Acute Myeloid Leukemia Case with Isolated del(20q) Abnormality.
Chorong HAHM ; Yeung Chul MUN ; Chu Myong SEONG ; Wha Soon CHUNG ; Jungwon HUH
Annals of Laboratory Medicine 2012;32(6):445-449
Prognosis is known to be better in cases with isolated chromosomal abnormalities than in those with complex karyotypes. Accordingly, del(20q) as an isolated abnormality must be distinguished from cases in which it is associated with other chromosomal rearrangements for a better stratification of prognosis. We report a case of an isolated del(20q) abnormality with additional genomic aberrations identified using whole-genome single nucleotide polymorphism array (SNP-A)-based karyotyping. A 39-yr-old man was diagnosed with AML without maturation. Metaphase cytogenetic analysis (MC) revealed del(20)(q11.2) as the isolated abnormality in 100% of metaphase cells analyzed, and FISH analysis using D20S108 confirmed the 20q deletion in 99% of interphase cells. Using FISH, other rearrangements such as BCR/ABL1, RUNX1/RUNX1T1, PML/RARA, CBFB/MYH11, and MLL were found to be negative. SNP-A identified an additional copy neutral loss of heterozygosity (CN-LOH) in the 11q13.1-q25 region. Furthermore, SNP-A allowed for a more precise definition of the breakpoints of the 20q deletion (20q11.22-q13.31). Unexpectedly, the terminal regions showed gain on chromosome 20q. The patient did not achieve complete remission; 8 months later, he died from complications of leukemic cell infiltrations into the central nervous system. This study suggests that a presumably isolated chromosomal abnormality by MC may have additional genomic aberrations, including CN-LOH, which could be associated with a poor prognosis. SNP-A-based karyotyping may be helpful for distinguishing true isolated cases from cases in combination with additional genomic aberrations not detected by MC.
6.Ring Chromosome 5 in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Defined by Whole-genome Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Array.
Jungwon HUH ; Yeung Chul MUN ; Wha Soon CHUNG ; Chu Myong SEONG
Annals of Laboratory Medicine 2012;32(4):307-311
Chromosomes forming a corresponding ring cannot be clearly defined by conventional cytogenetics or FISH. Karyotypic analyses using whole-genome single nucleotide polymorphism arrays (SNP-A) may result in the identification of previously cryptic lesions and allow for more precise definition of breakpoints. We describe a case of AML with metaphase cells bearing -5, del(11)(q22), and +r. With SNP-A, a 5p-terminal deletion (11 megabases [Mb]), a 5q-terminal deletion (27 Mb), an 11q-interstitial deletion (29 Mb), and a 21q gain (3 Mb) were identified. Therefore, the G-banded karyotype was revised as 46, XY, r(5)(p15. 2q33.2), del(11)(q14.1q23.2), dup(21)(q22.13q22.2)[18]/46,XY[2]. SNP-A could be a powerful tool for characterizing ring chromosomes in which the involved chromosomes or bands cannot be precisely identified by conventional cytogenetics or FISH.
Chromosome Deletion
;
*Chromosomes, Human, Pair 5
;
Humans
;
In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence
;
Karyotyping
;
Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/*diagnosis/genetics
;
Male
;
Metaphase
;
Middle Aged
;
Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis
;
*Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide
;
*Ring Chromosomes
7.Sole Trisomy 22 Not Associated with inv(16) in Myelodysplastic Syndrome.
Chorong HAHM ; Yusun HWANG ; Yeung Chul MUN ; Chu Myong SEONG ; Wha Soon CHUNG ; Jungwon HUH
The Ewha Medical Journal 2012;35(1):62-64
Trisomy 22 is closely associated with inv(16) or t(16;16) and could be a marker of cryptic rearrangement of CBFB/MYH11 in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Trisomy 22 not associated with CBFB/MYH11 rearrangement is a rare event. Here, we report a case diagnosed as refractory anemia with excess blasts-2 (RAEB-2) with sole trisomy 22 in the absence of CBFB/MYH11 rearrangement. The cytogenetic study of bone marrow cells disclosed trisomy 22 in 10% of metaphase cells analyzed. The other chromosomal abnormalities were not found. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) using CBFB/MYH11 probe to detect cryptic inv(16)(p13q22) showed negative result. We also excluded rearrangements of chromosome 5, 7, 8, 20, and ETV6 by FISH. Sole trisomy 22 not associated with inv(16) is a true entity.
Anemia, Refractory
;
Bone Marrow Cells
;
Chromosome Aberrations
;
Chromosomes, Human, Pair 22
;
Chromosomes, Human, Pair 5
;
Cytogenetics
;
Fluorescence
;
In Situ Hybridization
;
Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute
;
Metaphase
;
Myelodysplastic Syndromes
;
Trisomy
8.Variant Philadelphia Chromosome Identified by Interphase Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) without Evidence on G-banded Karyotyping and Metaphase FISH.
Mi Kyung KIM ; Yeung Chul MUN ; Chu Myong SEONG ; Wha Soon CHUNG ; Jungwon HUH
The Korean Journal of Laboratory Medicine 2010;30(6):711-717
A variant Philadelphia chromosome (Ph) is generated from translocation of one or more partner chromosomes in addition to chromosomes 9 and 22. We have described the cases of 2 patients bearing variant Ph detected by interphase FISH but not detected by G-banded karyotyping and metaphase FISH. FISH was performed using BCR/ABL dual color dual fusion translocation probes (Abbott Molecular, USA). A 52-year-old man was diagnosed with acute leukemia of mixed phenotype. G-banded karyotyping showed 46,XY,t(9;22)(q34;q11.2)[12]/47,idem,+der(22)t(9;22)[5]/46,XY[3]. Interphase FISH revealed nuc ish(ABL1,BCR)x3(ABL1 con BCRx2)[329/450]/(ABL1,BCR)x4(ABL1 con BCRx3)[5/450]/(AL1,BCR)x3(ABL1 con BCRx1)[44/450]. Metaphase FISH showed ish (9;22)(ABL1+,BCR1+;BCR+,ABL+)[22]/der(22)(BCR+,ABL1+)[3]. The other case was that of a 31-yr-old male patient diagnosed with CML in the blastic phase. G-banded karyotyping of all 20 metaphase cells showed 47,XYYc,dup(1)(q21q32),del(7)(p11.2),t(9;22)(q34;q11.2). Interphase FISH revealed nuc ish(ABL1,BCR)x3(ABL1 con BCRx2)[254/600]/(ABL1,BCR)x3(ABL1 con BCRx1)[191/600]. Metaphase FISH showed ish t(9;22)(ABL1+,BCR+;BCR+,ABL1+)[16]. These results suggest that typical t(9;22) and variant Ph may coexist in the same patient, and interphase FISH may facilitate the detection of the variant Ph that cannot be detected by G-banded karyotyping alone.
Adult
;
Chromosomes, Human, Pair 22
;
Chromosomes, Human, Pair 9
;
Humans
;
In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence/*methods
;
Interphase
;
Karyotyping
;
Leukemia/diagnosis/genetics
;
Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/diagnosis/genetics
;
Male
;
Metaphase
;
Middle Aged
;
Phenotype
;
*Philadelphia Chromosome
;
Translocation, Genetic
9.Myelodysplastic Syndrome Mimicking Idiopathic Thrombocytopenic Purpura.
Yusun HWANG ; Jung Won HUH ; Yeung Chul MUN ; Chu Myong SEONG ; Wha Soon CHUNG
The Korean Journal of Laboratory Medicine 2010;30(2):105-110
BACKGROUND: In patients with isolated thrombocytopenia, but without significant dysplasia, diagnosis of idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) rather than myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) may be taken into account. It is important to make an accurate diagnosis because different treatments are used for ITP and MDS. The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical and hematologic features of patients who were initially diagnosed as ITP but had cytogenetic abnormalities. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed cytogenetic studies of 100 patients who were diagnosed as ITP from 2004 to 2009 at Mokdong Hospital of Ewha Womans University based on clinical features and hematologic studies. Bone marrow pathology was re-evaluated based on 2008 WHO classification. Cytogenetic analysis was performed by 24-48 hr culture of bone marrow aspirates without using mitogens and 20 metaphases were analyzed. RESULTS: Of the 100 patients diagnosed as ITP initially, three patients (3%) had cytogenetic abnormalities. They had no thrombocytopenia-related symptoms and thrombocytopenia was found accidentally. The numbers of megakaryocytes in bone marrow were increased and dysplasia was not found in megakaryocyte, erythroid, and myeloid cell lineages. The proportion of blasts was within normal limits. Clonal chromosomal abnormalities found were der(1;7)(q10;p10), add(9)(q12), or t(7;11)(p22;q12). Presumptive diagnosis of MDS or diagnosis of idiopathic cytopenia of undetermined significance (ICUS) was made according to 2008 WHO classification. During the follow up, disease progression was not found. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with suspected ITP, cytogenetic analysis should be done. If specific clonal chromosomal abnormality is found, presumptive diagnosis of MDS has to be considered and close follow up is needed.
Adult
;
Bone Marrow Cells/cytology
;
Cell Lineage
;
Chromosome Aberrations
;
Diagnosis, Differential
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Male
;
Megakaryocytes/immunology/pathology
;
Middle Aged
;
Myelodysplastic Syndromes/*diagnosis/genetics/pathology
;
Purpura, Thrombocytopenic, Idiopathic/*diagnosis/genetics/pathology
;
Retrospective Studies
10.Clinical utility of FISH analysis in addition to G-banded karyotype in hematologic malignancies and proposal of a practical approach.
Won Kyung KWON ; Jin Young LEE ; Yeung Chul MUN ; Chu Myong SEONG ; Wha Soon CHUNG ; Jungwon HUH
Korean Journal of Hematology 2010;45(3):171-176
BACKGROUND: Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis can provide important information in the management of patients with hematologic malignancies. However, FISH performed in addition to G-banded karyotype can be labor-intensive and expensive. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether FISH gives additional information in the setting of adequate conventional cytogenetics in cases of hematologic malignancies. METHODS: Bone marrow aspirates were obtained from 135 patients at diagnosis (56 AML, 32 MDS, 20 ALL, and 27 MM) between 2005 and 2010. Interphase FISH was performed using the following probes: BCR/ABL1, AML1/ETO, PML/RARA, CBFB, MLL, EGR1, CEP8, and D7S486 for AML; CEP8, D20S108, EGR1, and D7S486 for MDS; BCR/ABL1, MLL, CDKN2A (p16), ETV6, and 6q21/c-myc for ALL; IgH, TP53, D13S25, IgH/CCND1, IgH/MAF, IgH/FGFR3, and 1q21/8p21 for MM. We compared the results of FISH with the corresponding aberrations identified by G-banded karyotype. RESULTS: Additional genetic aberrations detected by FISH (which were not identified by G-banded karyotype) were 4%, 9%, 50%, and 67% in AML, MDS, ALL, and MM, respectively. In ALL, CDKN2A and ETV6 FISH revealed additional genetic aberrations in 33% and 28% of cases, respectively. In MM, FISH was of benefit in detecting IgH, D13S25, TP53, and 1q21 rearrangements, not detected by G-banded karyotype (31%, 36%, 20%, and 40%, respectively). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that performing FISH in addition to G-banded karyotype may contribute little additional genetic information in AML and MDS, whereas routine FISH analysis appears to be an efficient screening method in ALL and MM.
Bone Marrow
;
Cytogenetics
;
Fluorescence
;
Hematologic Neoplasms
;
Humans
;
In Situ Hybridization
;
Interphase
;
Karyotype
;
Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute
;
Mass Screening
;
Multiple Myeloma
;
Myelodysplastic Syndromes
;
Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail