1.Risk of Ischemic Stroke in Relation to Helicobacter pylori Infection and Eradication Status: A Large-Scale Prospective Observational Cohort Study
Eun-Bi JEON ; Nayoung KIM ; Beom Joon KIM ; In-Chang HWANG ; Sang Bin KIM ; Ji-Hyun KIM ; Yonghoon CHOI ; Yu Kyung JUN ; Hyuk YOON ; Cheol Min SHIN ; Young Soo PARK ; Dong Ho LEE ; Soyeon AHN
Gut and Liver 2024;18(4):642-653
Background/Aims:
A few studies have suggested the association between Helicobacter pylori (HP) infection and ischemic stroke. However, the impact of HP eradication on stroke risk has not been well evaluated. This study aimed to assess the influence of HP eradication on the incidence of ischemic stroke, considering the potential effect of sex.
Methods:
This prospective observational cohort study was conducted at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, from May 2003 to February 2023, and involved gastroscopy-based HP testing. Propensity score (PS) matching was employed to ensure balanced groups by matching patients in the HP eradicated group (n=2,803) in a 3:1 ratio with patients in the HP non-eradicated group (n=960). Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was used to evaluate the risk of ischemic stroke.
Results:
Among 6,664 patients, multivariate analysis after PS matching indicated that HP eradication did not significantly alter the risk of ischemic stroke (hazard ratio, 0.531; 95% confidence interval, 0.221 to 1.270; p=0.157). Sex-specific subgroup analyses, both univariate and multivariate, did not yield statistically significant differences. However, Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a potential trend: the females in the HP eradicated group exhibited a lower incidence of ischemic stroke than those in the HP non-eradicated group, although this did not reach statistical significance (p=0.057).
Conclusions
This finding suggests that HP eradication might not impact the risk of ischemic stroke. However, there was a trend showing that females potentially had a lower risk of ischemic stroke following HP eradication, though further investigation is required to establish definitive evidence.
2.Comparison of Factors Associated With Direct Versus Transferred-in Admission to Government-Designated Regional Centers Between Acute Ischemic Stroke and Myocardial Infarction in Korea
Dae-Hyun KIM ; Seok-Joo MOON ; Juneyoung LEE ; Jae-Kwan CHA ; Moo Hyun KIM ; Jong-Sung PARK ; Byeolnim BAN ; Jihoon KANG ; Beom Joon KIM ; Won-Seok KIM ; Chang-Hwan YOON ; Heeyoung LEE ; Seongheon KIM ; Eun Kyoung KANG ; Ae-Young HER ; Cindy W YOON ; Joung-Ho RHA ; Seong-Ill WOO ; Won Kyung LEE ; Han-Young JUNG ; Jang Hoon LEE ; Hun Sik PARK ; Yang-Ha HWANG ; Keonyeop KIM ; Rock Bum KIM ; Nack-Cheon CHOI ; Jinyong HWANG ; Hyun-Woong PARK ; Ki Soo PARK ; SangHak YI ; Jae Young CHO ; Nam-Ho KIM ; Kang-Ho CHOI ; Juhan KIM ; Jae-Young HAN ; Jay Chol CHOI ; Song-Yi KIM ; Joon-Hyouk CHOI ; Jei KIM ; Min Kyun SOHN ; Si Wan CHOI ; Dong-Ick SHIN ; Sang Yeub LEE ; Jang-Whan BAE ; Kun Sei LEE ; Hee-Joon BAE
Journal of Korean Medical Science 2022;37(42):e305-
Background:
There has been no comparison of the determinants of admission route between acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and acute myocardial infarction (AMI). We examined whether factors associated with direct versus transferred-in admission to regional cardiocerebrovascular centers (RCVCs) differed between AIS and AMI.
Methods:
Using a nationwide RCVC registry, we identified consecutive patients presenting with AMI and AIS between July 2016 and December 2018. We explored factors associated with direct admission to RCVCs in patients with AIS and AMI and examined whether those associations differed between AIS and AMI, including interaction terms between each factor and disease type in multivariable models. To explore the influence of emergency medical service (EMS) paramedics on hospital selection, stratified analyses according to use of EMS were also performed.
Results:
Among the 17,897 and 8,927 AIS and AMI patients, 66.6% and 48.2% were directly admitted to RCVCs, respectively. Multivariable analysis showed that previous coronary heart disease, prehospital awareness, higher education level, and EMS use increased the odds of direct admission to RCVCs, but the odds ratio (OR) was different between AIS and AMI (for the first 3 factors, AMI > AIS; for EMS use, AMI < AIS). EMS use was the single most important factor for both AIS and AMI (OR, 4.72 vs. 3.90). Hypertension and hyperlipidemia increased, while living alone decreased the odds of direct admission only in AMI;additionally, age (65–74 years), previous stroke, and presentation during non-working hours increased the odds only in AIS. EMS use weakened the associations between direct admission and most factors in both AIS and AMI.
Conclusions
Various patient factors were differentially associated with direct admission to RCVCs between AIS and AMI. Public education for symptom awareness and use of EMS is essential in optimizing the transportation and hospitalization of patients with AMI and AIS.
3.Prognostic Value of Alpha-Fetoprotein in Patients Who Achieve a Complete Response to Transarterial Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Jae Seung LEE ; Young Eun CHON ; Beom Kyung KIM ; Jun Yong PARK ; Do Young KIM ; Sang Hoon AHN ; Kwang-Hyub HAN ; Wonseok KANG ; Moon Seok CHOI ; Geum-Youn GWAK ; Yong-Han PAIK ; Joon Hyeok LEE ; Kwang Cheol KOH ; Seung Woon PAIK ; Hwi Young KIM ; Tae Hun KIM ; Kwon YOO ; Yeonjung HA ; Mi Na KIM ; Joo Ho LEE ; Seong Gyu HWANG ; Soon Sun KIM ; Hyo Jung CHO ; Jae Youn CHEONG ; Sung Won CHO ; Seung Ha PARK ; Nae-Yun HEO ; Young Mi HONG ; Ki Tae YOON ; Mong CHO ; Jung Gil PARK ; Min Kyu KANG ; Soo Young PARK ; Young Oh KWEON ; Won Young TAK ; Se Young JANG ; Dong Hyun SINN ; Seung Up KIM ;
Yonsei Medical Journal 2021;62(1):12-20
Purpose:
Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) is a prognostic marker for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We investigated the prognostic value of AFP levels in patients who achieved complete response (CR) to transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for HCC.
Materials and Methods:
Between 2005 and 2018, 890 patients with HCC who achieved a CR to TACE were recruited. An AFP responder was defined as a patient who showed elevated levels of AFP (>10 ng/mL) during TACE, but showed normalization or a >50% reduction in AFP levels after achieving a CR.
Results:
Among the recruited patients, 569 (63.9%) with naïve HCC and 321 (36.1%) with recurrent HCC after complete resection were treated. Before TACE, 305 (34.3%) patients had multiple tumors, 219 (24.6%) had a maximal tumor size >3 cm, and 22 (2.5%) had portal vein tumor thrombosis. The median AFP level after achieving a CR was 6.36 ng/mL. After a CR, 473 (53.1%) patients experienced recurrence, and 417 (46.9%) died [median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of 16.3 and 62.8 months, respectively]. High AFP levels at CR (>20 ng/mL) were independently associated with a shorter PFS [hazard ratio (HR)=1.403] and OS (HR=1.284), together with tumor multiplicity at TACE (HR=1.518 and 1.666, respectively). AFP non-responders at CR (76.2%, n=359 of 471) showed a shorter PFS (median 10.5 months vs. 15.5 months, HR=1.375) and OS (median 41.4 months vs. 61.8 months, HR=1.424) than AFP responders (all p=0.001).
Conclusion
High AFP levels and AFP non-responders were independently associated with poor outcomes after TACE. AFP holds clinical implications for detailed risk stratification upon achieving a CR after TACE.
4.The Korean Society for Neuro-Oncology (KSNO) Guideline for Antiepileptic Drug Usage of Brain Tumor: Version 2021.1
Jangsup MOON ; Min-Sung KIM ; Young Zoon KIM ; Kihwan HWANG ; Ji Eun PARK ; Kyung Hwan KIM ; Jin Mo CHO ; Wan-Soo YOON ; Se Hoon KIM ; Young Il KIM ; Ho Sung KIM ; Yun-Sik DHO ; Jae-Sung PARK ; Hong In YOON ; Youngbeom SEO ; Kyoung Su SUNG ; Jin Ho SONG ; Chan Woo WEE ; Min Ho LEE ; Myung-Hoon HAN ; Je Beom HONG ; Jung Ho IM ; Se-Hoon LEE ; Jong Hee CHANG ; Do Hoon LIM ; Chul-Kee PARK ; Youn Soo LEE ; Ho-Shin GWAK ;
Brain Tumor Research and Treatment 2021;9(1):9-15
Background:
To date, there has been no practical guidelines for the prescription of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in brain tumor patients in Korea. Thus, the Korean Society for Neuro-Oncology (KSNO), a multidisciplinary academic society, had begun preparing guidelines for AED usage in brain tumors since 2019.
Methods:
The Working Group was composed of 27 multidisciplinary medical experts in Korea.References were identified through searches of PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL using specific and sensitive keywords as well as combinations of the keywords.
Results:
The core contents are as follows. Prophylactic AED administration is not recommended in newly diagnosed brain tumor patients without previous seizure history. When AEDs are administered during peri/postoperative period, it may be tapered off according to the following recommendations. In seizure-naïve patients with no postoperative seizure, it is recommended to stop or reduce AED 1 week after surgery. In seizure-naïve patients with one early postoperative seizure (<1 week after surgery), it is advisable to maintain AED for at least 3 months before tapering. In seizure-naïve patients with ≥2 postoperative seizures or in patients with preoperative seizure history, it is recommended to maintain AEDs for more than 1 year. The possibility of drug interactions should be considered when selecting AEDs in brain tumor patients. Driving can be allowed in brain tumor patients when proven to be seizure-free for more than 1 year.
Conclusion
The KSNO suggests prescribing AEDs in patients with brain tumor based on the current guideline. This guideline will contribute to spreading evidence-based prescription of AEDs in brain tumor patients in Korea.
5.The Korean Society for Neuro-Oncology (KSNO) Guideline for Adult Diffuse Midline Glioma: Version 2021.1
Hong In YOON ; Chan Woo WEE ; Young Zoon KIM ; Youngbeom SEO ; Jung Ho IM ; Yun-Sik DHO ; Kyung Hwan KIM ; Je Beom HONG ; Jae-Sung PARK ; Seo Hee CHOI ; Min-Sung KIM ; Jangsup MOON ; Kihwan HWANG ; Ji Eun PARK ; Jin Mo CHO ; Wan-Soo YOON ; Se Hoon KIM ; Young Il KIM ; Ho Sung KIM ; Kyoung Su SUNG ; Jin Ho SONG ; Min Ho LEE ; Myung-Hoon HAN ; Se-Hoon LEE ; Jong Hee CHANG ; Do Hoon LIM ; Chul-Kee PARK ; Youn Soo LEE ; Ho-Shin GWAK ;
Brain Tumor Research and Treatment 2021;9(1):1-8
Background:
There have been no guidelines for the management of adult patients with diffuse midline glioma (DMG), H3K27M-mutant in Korea since the 2016 revised WHO classification newly defined this disease entity. Thus, the Korean Society for Neuro-Oncology (KSNO), a multidisciplinary academic society, had begun preparing guidelines for DMG since 2019.
Methods:
The Working Group was composed of 27 multidisciplinary medical experts in Korea.References were identified through searches of PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL using specific and sensitive keywords as well as combinations of keywords. As ‘diffuse midline glioma’ was recently defined, and there was no international guideline, trials and guidelines of ‘diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma’ or ‘brain stem glioma’ were thoroughly reviewed first.
Results:
The core contents are as follows. The DMG can be diagnosed when all of the following three criteria are satisfied: the presence of the H3K27M mutation, midline location, and infiltrating feature. Without identification of H3K27M mutation by diagnostic biopsy, DMG cannot be diagnosed. For the primary treatment, maximal safe resection should be considered for tumors when feasible. Radiotherapy is the primary option for tumors in case the total resection is not possible. A total dose of 54 Gy to 60 Gy with conventional fractionation prescribed at 1-2 cm plus gross tumor volume is recommended. Although no chemotherapy has proven to be effective in DMG, concurrent chemoradiotherapy (± maintenance chemotherapy) with temozolomide following WHO grade IV glioblastoma’s protocol is recommended.
Conclusion
The detection of H3K27M mutation is the most important diagnostic criteria for DMG. Combination of surgery (if amenable to surgery), radiotherapy, and chemotherapy based on comprehensive multidisciplinary discussion can be considered as the treatment options for DMG.
7.The Korean Society for Neuro-Oncology (KSNO) Guideline for Antiepileptic Drug Usage of Brain Tumor: Version 2021.1
Jangsup MOON ; Min-Sung KIM ; Young Zoon KIM ; Kihwan HWANG ; Ji Eun PARK ; Kyung Hwan KIM ; Jin Mo CHO ; Wan-Soo YOON ; Se Hoon KIM ; Young Il KIM ; Ho Sung KIM ; Yun-Sik DHO ; Jae-Sung PARK ; Hong In YOON ; Youngbeom SEO ; Kyoung Su SUNG ; Jin Ho SONG ; Chan Woo WEE ; Min Ho LEE ; Myung-Hoon HAN ; Je Beom HONG ; Jung Ho IM ; Se-Hoon LEE ; Jong Hee CHANG ; Do Hoon LIM ; Chul-Kee PARK ; Youn Soo LEE ; Ho-Shin GWAK ;
Brain Tumor Research and Treatment 2021;9(1):9-15
Background:
To date, there has been no practical guidelines for the prescription of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in brain tumor patients in Korea. Thus, the Korean Society for Neuro-Oncology (KSNO), a multidisciplinary academic society, had begun preparing guidelines for AED usage in brain tumors since 2019.
Methods:
The Working Group was composed of 27 multidisciplinary medical experts in Korea.References were identified through searches of PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL using specific and sensitive keywords as well as combinations of the keywords.
Results:
The core contents are as follows. Prophylactic AED administration is not recommended in newly diagnosed brain tumor patients without previous seizure history. When AEDs are administered during peri/postoperative period, it may be tapered off according to the following recommendations. In seizure-naïve patients with no postoperative seizure, it is recommended to stop or reduce AED 1 week after surgery. In seizure-naïve patients with one early postoperative seizure (<1 week after surgery), it is advisable to maintain AED for at least 3 months before tapering. In seizure-naïve patients with ≥2 postoperative seizures or in patients with preoperative seizure history, it is recommended to maintain AEDs for more than 1 year. The possibility of drug interactions should be considered when selecting AEDs in brain tumor patients. Driving can be allowed in brain tumor patients when proven to be seizure-free for more than 1 year.
Conclusion
The KSNO suggests prescribing AEDs in patients with brain tumor based on the current guideline. This guideline will contribute to spreading evidence-based prescription of AEDs in brain tumor patients in Korea.
8.The Korean Society for Neuro-Oncology (KSNO) Guideline for Adult Diffuse Midline Glioma: Version 2021.1
Hong In YOON ; Chan Woo WEE ; Young Zoon KIM ; Youngbeom SEO ; Jung Ho IM ; Yun-Sik DHO ; Kyung Hwan KIM ; Je Beom HONG ; Jae-Sung PARK ; Seo Hee CHOI ; Min-Sung KIM ; Jangsup MOON ; Kihwan HWANG ; Ji Eun PARK ; Jin Mo CHO ; Wan-Soo YOON ; Se Hoon KIM ; Young Il KIM ; Ho Sung KIM ; Kyoung Su SUNG ; Jin Ho SONG ; Min Ho LEE ; Myung-Hoon HAN ; Se-Hoon LEE ; Jong Hee CHANG ; Do Hoon LIM ; Chul-Kee PARK ; Youn Soo LEE ; Ho-Shin GWAK ;
Brain Tumor Research and Treatment 2021;9(1):1-8
Background:
There have been no guidelines for the management of adult patients with diffuse midline glioma (DMG), H3K27M-mutant in Korea since the 2016 revised WHO classification newly defined this disease entity. Thus, the Korean Society for Neuro-Oncology (KSNO), a multidisciplinary academic society, had begun preparing guidelines for DMG since 2019.
Methods:
The Working Group was composed of 27 multidisciplinary medical experts in Korea.References were identified through searches of PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL using specific and sensitive keywords as well as combinations of keywords. As ‘diffuse midline glioma’ was recently defined, and there was no international guideline, trials and guidelines of ‘diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma’ or ‘brain stem glioma’ were thoroughly reviewed first.
Results:
The core contents are as follows. The DMG can be diagnosed when all of the following three criteria are satisfied: the presence of the H3K27M mutation, midline location, and infiltrating feature. Without identification of H3K27M mutation by diagnostic biopsy, DMG cannot be diagnosed. For the primary treatment, maximal safe resection should be considered for tumors when feasible. Radiotherapy is the primary option for tumors in case the total resection is not possible. A total dose of 54 Gy to 60 Gy with conventional fractionation prescribed at 1-2 cm plus gross tumor volume is recommended. Although no chemotherapy has proven to be effective in DMG, concurrent chemoradiotherapy (± maintenance chemotherapy) with temozolomide following WHO grade IV glioblastoma’s protocol is recommended.
Conclusion
The detection of H3K27M mutation is the most important diagnostic criteria for DMG. Combination of surgery (if amenable to surgery), radiotherapy, and chemotherapy based on comprehensive multidisciplinary discussion can be considered as the treatment options for DMG.
10.A National Consensus Survey for Current Practicein Brain Tumor Management III: Brain Metastasis andPrimary Central Nervous System Lymphoma
Sung Kwon KIM ; Ji Eun PARK ; Kyung Hwan KIM ; Jin Mo CHO ; Jangsup MOON ; Wan-Soo YOON ; Se Hoon KIM ; Young Il KIM ; Young Zoon KIM ; Ho Sung KIM ; Yun-Sik DHO ; Jae-Sung PARK ; Hong In YOON ; Youngbeom SEO ; Kyoung Su SUNG ; Jin Ho SONG ; Chan Woo WEE ; Se-Hoon LEE ; Do Hoon LIM ; Jung Ho IM ; Jong Hee CHANG ; Myung-Hoon HAN ; Je Beom HONG ; Kihwan HWANG ; Chul-Kee PARK ; Youn Soo LEE ; Ho-Shin GWAK ;
Brain Tumor Research and Treatment 2020;8(1):20-28
Background:
: The Guideline Working Group of the Korean Society for Neuro-Oncology (KSNO)conducted the nationwide questionnaire survey for diverse queries facing to treat patients with braintumor. As part III of the survey, the aim of this study is to evaluate the national patterns of clinical practicefor patients with brain metastasis and primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL).
Methods:
: A web-based survey was sent to all members of the KSNO by email. The survey included7 questions of brain metastasis and 5 questions of PCNSL, focused on the management strategiesin specific situations. All questions were developed by consensus of the Guideline WorkingGroup.
Results:
" In the survey about brain metastasis, respondents preferred surgical resection withadjuvant treatment for patients with a surgically accessible single brain metastatic lesion less than 3cm in size without extracranial systemic lesions. However, most respondents considered radiosurgeryfor surgically inaccessible lesions. As the preferred treatment of multiple brain metastases according tothe number of brain lesions, respondents tended to choose radiotherapy with increasing number of lesions.Radiosurgery was mostly chosen for the brain metastases of less than or equal to 4. In the surveyabout PCNSL, a half of respondents choose high-dose methotrexate-based polychemotherapy asthe first-line induction therapy for PCNSL. The consolidation and salvage therapy showed a little variationamong respondents. For PCNSL patients with cerebrospinal fluid dissemination, intrathecal chemotherapywas most preferred.
Conclusion
: The survey demonstrates the prevailing clinical practice patterns for patients withbrain metastasis and PCNSL among members of the KSNO. This information provides a point of referencefor establishing a practical guideline in the management of brain metastasis and PCNSL.

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail