1.Association of TLR7 gene copy number variations and systemic lupus erythematosus in Han population
Zhaohui ZHENG ; Rui WANG ; Guiye WANG ; Shilin GAO ; Songwei LI ; Zhangsuo LIU
Chinese Journal of Rheumatology 2013;(3):148-151
Objective To examine the variation in TLR7 gene copy number of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in Han population,and investigate the relationship between TLR7 gene copy number variations and clinical phenotypes of SLE.Methods Determination of gene copy number of TLR7 was achieved by AccuCopyTM multiple gene copy number detection method in 337 cases of Han SLE patients and 338 healthy controls.According to the clinical phenotype stratification,all cases were divided into lupus nephritis and non-lupus nephritis group,the hematological involvement and non-hematological involvement group,anti-Smith antibody positive and negative group.The data were analyzed by non-parametric rank test.Results Based on sex,there was no significant difference in the variations in TLR7 gene copy number between in female SLE patients and female healthy controls (Z=-1.175,P=0.240).There was also no difference in male group (Z=-1.085,P=0.278).Comparing gene copy numbers variation based on the presence or absence of lupus nephritis,hematological involvement,and anti-Smith antibody,there was no statistical significant difference in female SLE patients(Z=-0.888,P=0.375; Z=-1.085,P=0.278; Z=-0.529,P=0.597).There was no difference in variation in male SLE patients,neither (Z=-0.460,P=0.646; Z=-0.340,P=0.733;Z=-0.158,P=0.874).Conclusion The variations in TLR7 gene copy number are not correlated with SLE and clinical phenotypes of SLE in Han population.
2.Mitigating metal artifacts in cone-beam CT images through deep learning techniques
Linghui JIA ; Honglei LIN ; Songwei ZHENG ; Xiujiao LIN ; Dong ZHANG ; Hao YU
Chinese Journal of Stomatology 2024;59(1):71-79
Objective:To develop and evaluate metal artifact removal systems (MARSs) based on deep learning to assess their effectiveness in removing artifacts caused by different thicknesses of metals in cone-beam CT (CBCT) images.Methods:A full-mouth standard model (60 mm×75 mm×110 mm) was three-dimensional (3D) printed using photosensitive resin. The model included a removable and replaceable target tooth position where cobalt-chromium alloy crowns with varying thicknesses were inserted to generate matched CBCT images. The artifacts resulting from cobalt-chromium alloys with different thicknesses were evaluated using the structural similarity index measure (SSIM) and peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR). CNN-MARS and U-net-MARS were developed using a convolutional neural network and U-net architecture, respectively. The effectiveness of both MARSs were assessed through visualization and by measuring SSIM and PSNR values. The SSIM and PSNR values were statistically analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (α=0.05).Results:Significant differences were observed in the range of artifacts produced by different thicknesses of cobalt-chromium alloys (all P<0.05), with 1 mm resulting in the least artifacts. The SSIM values for specimens with thicknesses of 1.0 mm, 1.5 mm, and 2.0 mm were 0.916±0.019, 0.873±0.010, and 0.833±0.010, respectively ( F=447.89, P<0.001). The corresponding PSNR values were 20.834±1.176, 17.002±0.427, and 14.673±0.429, respectively ( F=796.51, P<0.001). After applying CNN-MARS and U-net-MARS to artifact removal, the SSIM and PSNR values significantly increased for images with the same thickness of metal (both P<0.05). When using the CNN-MARS for artifact removal, the SSIM values for 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 mm were 0.938±0.023, 0.930±0.029, and 0.928±0.020 ( F=2.22, P=0.112), while the PSNR values were 30.938±1.495, 30.578±2.154 and 30.553±2.355 ( F=0.54, P=0.585). When using the U-net-MARS for artifact removal, the SSIM values for 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 mm were 0.930±0.024, 0.932±0.017 and 0.930±0.012 ( F=0.24, P=0.788), and the PSNR values were 30.291±0.934, 30.351±1.002 and 30.271±1.143 ( F=0.07, P=0.929). No significant differences were found in SSIM and PSNR values after artifact removal using CNN-MARS and U-net-MARS for different thicknesses of cobalt-chromium alloys (all P>0.05). Visualization demonstrated a high degree of similarity between the images before and after artifact removal using both MARSs. However, CNN-MARS displayed clearer metal edges and preserved more tissue details when compared with U-net-MARS. Conclusions:Both the CNN-MARS and U-net-MARS models developed in this study effectively remove the metal artifacts and enhance the image quality. CNN-MARS exhibited an advantage in restoring tissue structure information around the artifacts compared to U-net-MARS.
3.Mitigating metal artifacts from cobalt-chromium alloy crowns in cone-beam CT images through deep learning techniques
Linghui JIA ; Honglei LIN ; Songwei ZHENG ; Xiujiao LIN ; Dong ZHANG ; Hao YU
Chinese Journal of Stomatology 2024;59(1):71-79
Objective:To develop and evaluate metal artifact removal systems (MARS) based on deep learning to assess their effectiveness in removing artifacts caused by different thicknesses of metals in cone-beam CT (CBCT) images.Methods:A full-mouth standard model (60 mm×75 mm×110 mm) was three-dimensional (3D) printed using photosensitive resin. The model included a removable and replaceable target tooth position where cobalt-chromium alloy crowns with varying thicknesses were inserted to generate matched CBCT images. The artifacts resulting from cobalt-chromium alloys with different thicknesses were evaluated using the structural similarity index measure (SSIM) and peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR). CNN-MARS and U-net-MARS were developed using a convolutional neural network and U-net architecture, respectively. The effectiveness of both MARSs were assessed through visualization and by measuring SSIM and PSNR values. The SSIM and PSNR values were statistically analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (α=0.05).Results:Significant differences were observed in the range of artifacts produced by different thicknesses of cobalt-chromium alloys (all P<0.05), with 1 mm resulting in the least artifacts. The SSIM values for specimens with thicknesses of 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 mm were 0.916±0.019, 0.873±0.010, and 0.833±0.010, respectively ( F=447.89, P<0.001). The corresponding PSNR values were 20.834±1.176, 17.002±0.427, and 14.673±0.429, respectively ( F=796.51, P<0.001). After applying CNN-MARS and U-net-MARS to artifact removal, the SSIM and PSNR values significantly increased for images with the same thickness of metal (both P<0.05). When using the CNN-MARS for artifact removal, the SSIM values for 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 mm were 0.938±0.023, 0.930±0.029, and 0.928±0.020 ( F=2.22, P=0.112), while the PSNR values were 30.938±1.495, 30.578±2.154 and 30.553±2.355 ( F=0.54, P=0.585). When using the U-net-MARS for artifact removal, the SSIM values for 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 mm were 0.930±0.024, 0.932±0.017 and 0.930±0.012 ( F=0.24, P=0.788), and the PSNR values were 30.291±0.934, 30.351±1.002 and 30.271±1.143 ( F=0.07, P=0.929). No significant differences were found in SSIM and PSNR values after artifact removal using CNN-MARS and U-net-MARS for different thicknesses of cobalt-chromium alloys (all P>0.05). Visualization demonstrated a high degree of similarity between the images before and after artifact removal using both MARS. However, CNN-MARS displayed clearer metal edges and preserved more tissue details when compared with U-net-MARS. Conclusions:Both the CNN-MARS and U-net-MARS models developed in this study effectively remove the metal artifacts and enhance the image quality. CNN-MARS exhibited an advantage in restoring tissue structure information around the artifacts compared to U-net-MARS.