[Objective] To investigate and summarize the clinicopathological features, diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of adrenocortical carcinoma with rhabdoid features. [Methods] The clinical diagnosis and treatment of a case of adrenocortical carcinoma with rhabdoid features admitled to Department of Urology, Weifang People's Hospital were reported.The clinical manifestations, pathological features, diagnosis and prognosis of the disease were analyzed in combination with relevant literature. [Results] A 34-year-old male patient was admitted due to scrotal distension and pain that had persisted for 6 months.Imaging examination showed a huge soft tissue tumor in the left adrenal region of the retroperitoneum with compression displacement of the left kidney, leading to obstruction of venous return in the left spermatic vein, which in turn caused varicose veins.The levels of serum renin, angiotensin, aldosterone, cortisol, and catecholamine were within normal ranges.Surgical resection of the tumor was performed, and postoperative pathological examination revealed that the tumor tissue was predominantly composed of rhabdoid cells, exhibiting positive immunohistochemical staining for INI 1, Syn, Calretinin and Vimentin.Genetic testing did not identify any deletion of SMARCB1 and SMARCA4 mutations.Therefore, the diagnosis was adrenocortical carcinoma with rhabdoid features.At the current 20-month follow-up, no recurrence or metastasis was observed.A review of the literature found that only 7 cases of this disease had been reported. [Conclusion] Adrenocortical carcinoma with rhabdoid features is a rare disease, and a definitive diagnosis is dependent upon pathological examination.Surgical resection remains the primary treatment.Long-term follow-up is essential, and further research is needed to evaluate the impact of adjuvant therapy.

ObjectiveTo analyze the detected results of CD4⁺T lymphocytes and viral load in newly identified human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infected patients in Huangpu District of Shanghai in 2023, to explore the correlation between them, so as to provide a scientific basis for the development of targeted prevention and control measures and antiviral treatment programs. MethodsThe data of CD4 cell count, viral load and demographic characteristics of the newly infected patients living with HIV in Huangpu District, Shanghai in 2023 were collected and analyzed by using descriptive epidemiological method. ResultsThe mean CD4 cell count of the 67 newly identified HIV infected patients in Huangpu District was (301.22±235.19) cells·µL^-1, with a mean viral load of (5.15±1.28) ×10⁵ copies·mL^-1.There were statistically significant differences in CD4 cell count and viral load among different age groups (P<0.05), but there were no statistically significant differences by gender and marital status (both P>0.05). The CD4 cell count and CD4/CD8 ratio both were negatively correlated with the lg value of viral load (r=-0.290, -0.378; P=0.027, 0.002). ConclusionThe CD4 cell counts of the newly identified HIV infected patients in Huangpu District in 2023 were generally low, the proportion of patients with high viral load was high, but the risk for elderly infected with HIV was high. The elderly have gradually become the key population for AIDS prevention and control in Huangpu District. It is recommended to expand HIV screening in the elderly to reduce the risk of HIV transmission and increase the rate of early detection and treatment.

Objective It explores the importance and effectiveness perception of 55 third-tier indicators in the cur-rent performance evaluation system.Methods From the perspective of those being assessed,it employs survey ques-tionnaires,Importance Performance Analysis(IPA),and focus group interviews to conduct research on the impor-tance and effectiveness perception.Results The overall perception of the importance and effectiveness of third-tier in-dicators is relatively high,and the performance evaluation indicator system can effectively assess the development level of level-3 public hospitals.There is a general discrepancy between the perception of importance and effective-ness.Some third-tier indicators face issues of insufficient perception of both importance and effectiveness.Conclu-sion Performance evaluation policy formulation based on the implementation of policies and after excluding the scores of indicators closely related to stakeholders can re-monitor and analyze indicators.This allows for the addition or removal of third-tier indicators,adjustment of indicator weights,optimization of indicator content,precision in mea-suring indicators,and improvement of the performance evaluation effectiveness of level-3 public hospitals.

Objective It explores the importance and effectiveness perception of 55 third-tier indicators in the cur-rent performance evaluation system.Methods From the perspective of those being assessed,it employs survey ques-tionnaires,Importance Performance Analysis(IPA),and focus group interviews to conduct research on the impor-tance and effectiveness perception.Results The overall perception of the importance and effectiveness of third-tier in-dicators is relatively high,and the performance evaluation indicator system can effectively assess the development level of level-3 public hospitals.There is a general discrepancy between the perception of importance and effective-ness.Some third-tier indicators face issues of insufficient perception of both importance and effectiveness.Conclu-sion Performance evaluation policy formulation based on the implementation of policies and after excluding the scores of indicators closely related to stakeholders can re-monitor and analyze indicators.This allows for the addition or removal of third-tier indicators,adjustment of indicator weights,optimization of indicator content,precision in mea-suring indicators,and improvement of the performance evaluation effectiveness of level-3 public hospitals.

Objective It explores the importance and effectiveness perception of 55 third-tier indicators in the cur-rent performance evaluation system.Methods From the perspective of those being assessed,it employs survey ques-tionnaires,Importance Performance Analysis(IPA),and focus group interviews to conduct research on the impor-tance and effectiveness perception.Results The overall perception of the importance and effectiveness of third-tier in-dicators is relatively high,and the performance evaluation indicator system can effectively assess the development level of level-3 public hospitals.There is a general discrepancy between the perception of importance and effective-ness.Some third-tier indicators face issues of insufficient perception of both importance and effectiveness.Conclu-sion Performance evaluation policy formulation based on the implementation of policies and after excluding the scores of indicators closely related to stakeholders can re-monitor and analyze indicators.This allows for the addition or removal of third-tier indicators,adjustment of indicator weights,optimization of indicator content,precision in mea-suring indicators,and improvement of the performance evaluation effectiveness of level-3 public hospitals.

Objective It explores the importance and effectiveness perception of 55 third-tier indicators in the cur-rent performance evaluation system.Methods From the perspective of those being assessed,it employs survey ques-tionnaires,Importance Performance Analysis(IPA),and focus group interviews to conduct research on the impor-tance and effectiveness perception.Results The overall perception of the importance and effectiveness of third-tier in-dicators is relatively high,and the performance evaluation indicator system can effectively assess the development level of level-3 public hospitals.There is a general discrepancy between the perception of importance and effective-ness.Some third-tier indicators face issues of insufficient perception of both importance and effectiveness.Conclu-sion Performance evaluation policy formulation based on the implementation of policies and after excluding the scores of indicators closely related to stakeholders can re-monitor and analyze indicators.This allows for the addition or removal of third-tier indicators,adjustment of indicator weights,optimization of indicator content,precision in mea-suring indicators,and improvement of the performance evaluation effectiveness of level-3 public hospitals.

Objective It explores the importance and effectiveness perception of 55 third-tier indicators in the cur-rent performance evaluation system.Methods From the perspective of those being assessed,it employs survey ques-tionnaires,Importance Performance Analysis(IPA),and focus group interviews to conduct research on the impor-tance and effectiveness perception.Results The overall perception of the importance and effectiveness of third-tier in-dicators is relatively high,and the performance evaluation indicator system can effectively assess the development level of level-3 public hospitals.There is a general discrepancy between the perception of importance and effective-ness.Some third-tier indicators face issues of insufficient perception of both importance and effectiveness.Conclu-sion Performance evaluation policy formulation based on the implementation of policies and after excluding the scores of indicators closely related to stakeholders can re-monitor and analyze indicators.This allows for the addition or removal of third-tier indicators,adjustment of indicator weights,optimization of indicator content,precision in mea-suring indicators,and improvement of the performance evaluation effectiveness of level-3 public hospitals.

Objective It explores the importance and effectiveness perception of 55 third-tier indicators in the cur-rent performance evaluation system.Methods From the perspective of those being assessed,it employs survey ques-tionnaires,Importance Performance Analysis(IPA),and focus group interviews to conduct research on the impor-tance and effectiveness perception.Results The overall perception of the importance and effectiveness of third-tier in-dicators is relatively high,and the performance evaluation indicator system can effectively assess the development level of level-3 public hospitals.There is a general discrepancy between the perception of importance and effective-ness.Some third-tier indicators face issues of insufficient perception of both importance and effectiveness.Conclu-sion Performance evaluation policy formulation based on the implementation of policies and after excluding the scores of indicators closely related to stakeholders can re-monitor and analyze indicators.This allows for the addition or removal of third-tier indicators,adjustment of indicator weights,optimization of indicator content,precision in mea-suring indicators,and improvement of the performance evaluation effectiveness of level-3 public hospitals.

Objective It explores the importance and effectiveness perception of 55 third-tier indicators in the cur-rent performance evaluation system.Methods From the perspective of those being assessed,it employs survey ques-tionnaires,Importance Performance Analysis(IPA),and focus group interviews to conduct research on the impor-tance and effectiveness perception.Results The overall perception of the importance and effectiveness of third-tier in-dicators is relatively high,and the performance evaluation indicator system can effectively assess the development level of level-3 public hospitals.There is a general discrepancy between the perception of importance and effective-ness.Some third-tier indicators face issues of insufficient perception of both importance and effectiveness.Conclu-sion Performance evaluation policy formulation based on the implementation of policies and after excluding the scores of indicators closely related to stakeholders can re-monitor and analyze indicators.This allows for the addition or removal of third-tier indicators,adjustment of indicator weights,optimization of indicator content,precision in mea-suring indicators,and improvement of the performance evaluation effectiveness of level-3 public hospitals.

Objective It explores the importance and effectiveness perception of 55 third-tier indicators in the cur-rent performance evaluation system.Methods From the perspective of those being assessed,it employs survey ques-tionnaires,Importance Performance Analysis(IPA),and focus group interviews to conduct research on the impor-tance and effectiveness perception.Results The overall perception of the importance and effectiveness of third-tier in-dicators is relatively high,and the performance evaluation indicator system can effectively assess the development level of level-3 public hospitals.There is a general discrepancy between the perception of importance and effective-ness.Some third-tier indicators face issues of insufficient perception of both importance and effectiveness.Conclu-sion Performance evaluation policy formulation based on the implementation of policies and after excluding the scores of indicators closely related to stakeholders can re-monitor and analyze indicators.This allows for the addition or removal of third-tier indicators,adjustment of indicator weights,optimization of indicator content,precision in mea-suring indicators,and improvement of the performance evaluation effectiveness of level-3 public hospitals.