1.Tufting Enteropathy with EpCAM Mutations in Two Siblings.
Jae Sung KO ; Jeong Kee SEO ; Jeong Ok SHIM ; Sol Ha HWANG ; Heae Surng PARK ; Gyeong Hoon KANG
Gut and Liver 2010;4(3):407-410
Tufting enteropathy is a rare autosomal recessive disorder presenting with early-onset severe intractable diarrhea. The epithelial cell adhesion molecule gene (EpCAM) has recently been identified as the gene responsible for tufting enteropathy. Based on histology, a diagnosis of tufting enteropathy was made in two Korean siblings. They developed chronic diarrhea and failure to thrive. They had a broad nasal bridge and micrognathia. Duodenal and colonic biopsies showed villous atrophy, disorganization of surface enterocytes, and focal crowding resembling tufts. Protracted diarrhea continued and so cyclic parenteral nutrition was supplied. The sister had juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Mutation analysis of EpCAM identified two compound heterozygous mutations in these siblings: 1) a donor splicing site mutation in intron 5 (c.491+1G>A) and 2) a novel nonsense mutation in exon 3 (c.316A>T, Lys106X). Analysis of EpCAM will be useful for genetic counseling and prenatal diagnosis of tufting enteropathy.
Antigens, Neoplasm
;
Arthritis, Juvenile Rheumatoid
;
Atrophy
;
Biopsy
;
Cell Adhesion Molecules
;
Codon, Nonsense
;
Colon
;
Crowding
;
Diarrhea
;
Enterocytes
;
Epithelial Cells
;
Exons
;
Failure to Thrive
;
Genetic Counseling
;
Humans
;
Introns
;
Parenteral Nutrition
;
Prenatal Diagnosis
;
Siblings
;
Tissue Donors
2.Improved Gastrointestinal Symptoms and Quality of Life after Conversion from Mycophenolate Mofetil to Enteric-Coated Mycophenolate Sodium in Renal Transplant Patients Receiving Tacrolimus.
Hyeon Seok HWANG ; Bok Jin HYOUNG ; Sol KIM ; Ha Young OH ; Yon Su KIM ; Jung Kyung KIM ; Yeong Hoon KIM ; Yong Lim KIM ; Chan Duck KIM ; Gyu Tae SHIN ; Chul Woo YANG
Journal of Korean Medical Science 2010;25(12):1759-1765
It is reported that a conversion from mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) to enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS) relieves gastrointestinal (GI) symptom burden and improves health-related quality of life (HRQoL). However, it is unclear whether renal transplant recipients using tacrolimus receive the same benefit from the conversion. In this prospective, multi-center, open-label trial, patients were categorized into two groups by their GI symptom screening. Equimolar EC-MPS (n=175) was prescribed for patients with GI burdens; those with no complaints remained on MMF (n=83). Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) and Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI) were evaluated at baseline and after one month. Patients and physicians completed Overall Treatment Effect (OTE) at one month. EC-MPS-converted patients had worse GSRS and GIQLI scores at baseline than MMF-continued patients (all P<0.001). Significant improvements in GSRS and GIQLI scores were observed for EC-MPS-converted patients at one month, but MMF-continued patients showed worsened GSRS scores (all P<0.05). OTE scale indicated that EC-MPS patients improved in overall GI symptoms and HRQoL more than MMF patients did (P<0.001). In tacrolimus-treated renal transplant recipients with GI burdens, a conversion from MMF to EC-MPS improves GI-related symptoms and HRQoL.
Adolescent
;
Adult
;
Aged
;
Female
;
Gastrointestinal Diseases/*chemically induced
;
Graft Rejection/drug therapy
;
Humans
;
Immunosuppressive Agents/administration & dosage/*adverse effects/therapeutic use
;
Kidney Failure, Chronic/therapy
;
*Kidney Transplantation
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
Mycophenolic Acid/administration & dosage/*adverse effects/*analogs & derivatives/therapeutic use
;
Quality of Life
;
Questionnaires
;
Tablets, Enteric-Coated
;
Tacrolimus/therapeutic use
3.Efficacy of Pegylated Interferon Monotherapy versus Sequential Therapy of Entecavir and Pegylated Interferon in Hepatitis B e Antigen-Positive Hepatitis B Patients: A Randomized, Multicenter, Phase IIIb Open-Label Study (POTENT Study).
Dae Won JUN ; Sang Bong AHN ; Tae Yeob KIM ; Joo Hyun SOHN ; Sang Gyune KIM ; Se Whan LEE ; Byung Ho KIM ; Dong Joon KIM ; Ja Kyung KIM ; Hyoung Su KIM ; Seong Gyu HWANG ; Won Choong CHOI ; Won Young TAK ; Heon Ju LEE ; Ki Tae YOON ; Byung Cheol YUN ; Sung Wook LEE ; Soon Koo BAIK ; Seung Ha PARK ; Ji Won PARK ; Sol Ji PARK ; Ji Sung LEE
Chinese Medical Journal 2018;131(14):1645-1651
BackgroundUntil now, various types of combined therapy with nucleotide analogs and pegylated interferon (Peg-INF) in patients with hepatitis B patients have been tried. However, studies regarding the benefits of de novo combination, late-add on, and sequential treatment are very limited. The objective of the current study was to identify the efficacy of sequential treatment of Peg-INF after short-term antiviral treatment.
MethodsBetween June 2010 and June 2015, hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive patients (n = 162) received Peg-IFN for 48 weeks (mono-treatment group, n = 81) and entecavir (ETV) for 12 weeks with a 48-week course of Peg-IFN starting at week 5 of ETV therapy (sequential treatment group, n = 81). The primary endpoint was HBeAg seroconversion at the end of follow-up period after the 24-week treatment. The primary endpoint was analyzed using Chi-square test, Fisher's exact test, and regression analysis.
ResultsHBeAg seroconversion rate (18.2% vs. 18.2%, t = 0.03, P = 1.000) and seroclearance rate (19.7% vs. 19.7%, t = 0.03, P = 1.000) were same in both mono-treatment and sequential treatment groups. The rate of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) normalization (45.5% vs. 54.5%, t = 1.12, P = 0.296) and serum hepatitis B virus (HBV)-DNA <2000 U/L (28.8% vs. 28.8%, t = 0.10, P = 1.000) was not different in sequential and mono-treatment groups at 24 weeks of Peg-INF. Viral response rate (HBeAg seroconversion and serum HBV-DNA <2000 U/L) was not different in the two groups (12.1% vs. 16.7%, t = 1.83, P = 0.457). Baseline HBV-DNA level (7 logU/ml vs. 7.5 logU/ml, t = 1.70, P = 0.019) and hepatitis B surface antigen titer (3.6 logU/ml vs. 4.0 logU/ml, t = 2.19, P = 0.020) were lower and predictors of responder in mono-treatment and sequential treatment groups, respectively.
ConclusionsThe current study shows no differences in HBeAg seroconversion rate, ALT normalization, and HBV-DNA levels between mono-therapy and sequential therapy regimens.
Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01220596; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01220596?term=NCT01220596&rank=1.