1.Clinical Factors Associated with the Non-Operative Airway Management of Patients with Robin Sequence.
Frank P ALBINO ; Benjamin C WOOD ; Kevin D HAN ; Sojung YI ; Mitchel SERUYA ; Gary F ROGERS ; Albert K OH
Archives of Plastic Surgery 2016;43(6):506-511
BACKGROUND: The indications for surgical airway management in patients with Robin sequence (RS) and severe airway obstruction have not been well defined. While certain patients with RS clearly require surgical airway intervention and other patients just as clearly can be managed with conservative measures alone, a significant proportion of patients with RS present with a more confusing and ambiguous clinical course. The purpose of this study was to describe the clinical features and objective findings of patients with RS whose airways were successfully managed without surgical intervention. METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed the medical charts of infants with RS evaluated for potential surgical airway management between 1994 and 2014. Patients who were successfully managed without surgical intervention were included. Patient demographics, nutritional and respiratory status, laboratory values, and polysomnography (PSG) findings were recorded. RESULTS: Thirty-two infants met the inclusion criteria. The average hospital stay was 16.8 days (range, 5–70 days). Oxygen desaturation (<70% by pulse oximetry) occurred in the majority of patients and was managed with temporary oxygen supplementation by nasal cannula (59%) or endotracheal intubation (31%). Seventy-five percent of patients required a temporary nasogastric tube for nutritional support, and a gastrostomy tube placed was placed in 9%. All patients continued to gain weight following the implementation of these conservative measures. PSG data (n=26) demonstrated mild to moderate obstruction, a mean apneahypopnea index (AHI) of 19.2±5.3 events/hour, and an oxygen saturation level <90% during only 4% of the total sleep time. CONCLUSIONS: Nonsurgical airway management was successful in patients who demonstrated consistent weight gain and mild to moderate obstruction on PSG, with a mean AHI of <20 events/hour.
Airway Management*
;
Airway Obstruction
;
Catheters
;
Classification
;
Demography
;
Disease Management
;
Gastrostomy
;
Humans
;
Infant
;
Intubation, Intratracheal
;
Length of Stay
;
Nutritional Support
;
Oxygen
;
Pierre Robin Syndrome*
;
Polysomnography
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Songbirds*
;
Weight Gain
2.Sorafenib for 9,923 Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma:An Analysis from National Health Insurance Claim Data in South Korea
Sojung HAN ; Do Young KIM ; Ho Yeong LIM ; Jung-Hwan YOON ; Baek-Yeol RYOO ; Yujeong KIM ; Kookhee KIM ; Bo Yeon KIM ; So Young YI ; Dong-Sook KIM ; Do-Yeon CHO ; Jina YU ; Suhyun KIM ; Joong-Won PARK
Gut and Liver 2024;18(1):116-124
Background/Aims:
Sorafenib is the standard of care in the management of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The purpose of this study was to investigate the characteristics, treatment patterns and outcomes of sorafenib among HCC patients in South Korea.
Methods:
This population-based retrospective, single-arm, observational study used the Korean National Health Insurance database to identify patients with HCC who received sorafenib between July 1, 2008, and December 31, 2014. A total of 9,923 patients were recruited in this study.
Results:
Among 9,923 patients, 6,669 patients (68.2%) received loco-regional therapy prior to sorafenib, and 1,565 patients (15.8%) received combination therapy with concomitant sorafenib;2,591 patients (26.1%) received rescue therapy after sorafenib, and transarterial chemoembolization was the most common modality applied in 1,498 patients (15.1%). A total of 3,591 patients underwent rescue therapy after sorafenib, and the median overall survival was 14.5 months compared to 4.6 months in 7,332 patients who received supportive care after sorafenib. The mean duration of sorafenib administration in all patients was 105.7 days; 7,023 patients (70.8%) received an initial dose of 600 to 800 mg. The longest survival was shown in patients who received the recommended dose of 800 mg, subsequently reduced to 400 mg (15.0 months). The second longest survival was demonstrated in patients with a starting dose of 800 mg, followed by a dose reduction to 400–600 mg (9.6 months).
Conclusions
Real-life data show that the efficacy of sorafenib seems similar to that observed in clinical trials, suggesting that appropriate subsequent therapy after sorafenib might prolong patient survival.