2.The Effect of Cigarette Price on Smoking Behavior in Korea.
Woojin CHUNG ; Seungji LIM ; Sunmi LEE ; Sungjoo CHOI ; Kayoung SHIN ; Kyungsook CHO
Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health 2007;40(5):371-380
OBJECTIVES: To determine the impact of cigarette prices on the decision to initiate and quit smoking by taking into account the interdependence of smoking and other behavioral risk factors. METHODS: The study population consisted of 3,000 male Koreans aged > or =20. A survey by telephone interview was undertaken to collect information on cigarette price, smoking and other behavioral risk factors. A two-part model was used to examine separately the effect of price on the decision to be a smoker, and on the amount of cigarettes smoked. RESULTS: The overall price elasticity of cigarettes was estimated at -0.66, with a price elasticity of -0.02 for smoking participation and -0.64 for the amount of cigarettes consumed by smokers. The inclusion of other behavioral risk factors reduced the estimated price elasticity for smoking participation substantially, but had no effect on the conditional price elasticity for the quantity of cigarettes smoked. CONCLUSIONS: From the public health and financial perspectives, an increase in cigarette price would significantly reduce smoking prevalence as well as cigarette consumption by smokers in Korea.
Adult
;
*Costs and Cost Analysis
;
Health Behavior
;
Humans
;
Korea/epidemiology
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
Risk Factors
;
Smoking/*economics/*prevention & control
;
Social Environment
;
Socioeconomic Factors
;
*Tobacco
3.A Comparison of Smoking Control Strategies in Korea and the United States.
Chung Yul LEE ; Ok Kyung HAM ; Yoon Mi HONG
Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing 2004;34(8):1379-1387
The purpose of this study was to compare smoking control strategies between Korea and the United States. Korea and other developing countries may learn from the experience of the United States in dealing with the growing epidemic of cigarettes. In particular, smoking control objectives, structures, laws and regulations, funds, programs and activities, research, and surveillance systems were compared. The comparison was conducted at the federal, states/provincial, and county levels of the two countries. The data were collected through various governmental websites, contact with people directly, and a literature review. Based on the comparison, seven recommendations for smoking control strategies were made primarily for Korea.
Cross-Cultural Comparison
;
Federal Government
;
Financing, Government/organization & administration
;
Government Programs/*organization & administration
;
Government Regulation
;
Health Education/organization & administration
;
Health Policy/legislation & jurisprudence
;
Health Priorities/organization & administration
;
Health Promotion/*organization & administration
;
Humans
;
Korea/epidemiology
;
Local Government
;
Population Surveillance
;
*Public Health Practice/economics/legislation & jurisprudence
;
Research Support as Topic/organization & administration
;
Smoking/epidemiology/*legislation & jurisprudence/*prevention & control
;
Smoking Cessation/legislation & jurisprudence/methods
;
State Government
;
United States/epidemiology