1.The application of cassette automatic blood analyzer in irregular antibody screening for blood donors
Jiaoli ZOU ; Qing WANG ; Wentao ZOU ; Ziyi HE ; Ruoheng WANG ; Qingkai CHEN ; Siping CUI
International Journal of Laboratory Medicine 2015;(12):1739-1740
Objective To compare the application effect between the method of cassette automatic blood analyzer and the method of traditional serological .Methods Using the method of cassette automatic blood analyzer and the method of traditional serological , respectively ,the samples of blood donors in Dongguan from October 1 ,2013 to April 30 ,2014 were performed irregular antibody screening .The positive samples of screening were identified by using antiglobulin method ,and the irregular antibodies of blood do‐nors were analyzed .Results There were 95 positive cases of irregular antibody by the method of cassette automatic blood analyzer , and the detection rate was 0 .208% .There were 16 positive cases of irregular antibody by the method of traditional serological ,the detection rate was 0 .035% ,and there was statistical significance in differences (P< 0 .05) .The positive coincidence rate of the method of cassette automatic blood analyzer was 56 .547% ,higher than the rate of the method of traditional serological which was 28 .571 % (P<0 .05) .The positive rate of irregular antibody was 2 .242% in RhD‐negative blood donors ,higher than the rate in RhD‐positive blood donors which was 0 .198% (P<0 .05) .Conclusion The positive rate of irregular antibody in blood donors i‐dentified by using the method of cassette automatic blood analyzer is higher than the rate identified by using the method of tradition‐al serological .The irregular antibody screening should be performed for RhD‐negative blood donors .The types of irregular antibody in blood donors are mainly the types of IgM which are no clinical significance .
2.Para-Bombay phenotype due to bi-allelic heterozygous base deletions of FUT1 gene.
Ziyi HE ; Yingming HU ; Xianguo XU ; Yuanjun WU ; Siping CUI
Chinese Journal of Medical Genetics 2022;39(11):1290-1293
OBJECTIVE:
To explore the genetic mechanism underlying a case with para-Bombay phenotype.
METHODS:
The ABO and Lewis phenotype were identified with serological methods. The coding regions of exons 6 and 7 of the ABO and FUT1 genes were amplified with PCR and directly sequenced. Haploid sequence analysis was carried out on the variant sites of the FUT1 gene.
RESULTS:
Serological analysis confirmed that the proband has a rare para-Bombay phenotype. Direct sequencing revealed that he was a B.01/O.01.02 heterozygote for the ABO gene, and had heterozygous deletion for the 768 and 881-882 sites of the FUT1 gene. Further haploid analysis showed that the c.881_882delTT deletion has occurred in one haploid while c.768delC was present in the other haploid. The proband was therefore determined as a FUT1*01N.13/01N.20 heterozygote, which have resulted in frameshift in polypeptide chain p.Phe294Cysfs*40 and p.Val257Phefs*23, respectively.
CONCLUSION
A rare bi-allelic heterozygous deletion of para-Bombay phenotype has been identified in a blood donor. The c.881_882delTT and c.768delC deletions may decrease the activity of α-1,2-fucosyltransferase.
Animals
;
Male
;
ABO Blood-Group System/genetics*
;
Alleles
;
Fucosyltransferases/genetics*
;
Genotype
;
Heterozygote
;
Mutation
;
Phenotype
;
Humans
3.Application of automatic slide-dropping instrument in bone marrow chromosomal karyotyping
Wei ZHANG ; Chenghua CUI ; Ji ZHOU ; Yanyi LYU ; Siping WANG ; Shenghua CHEN ; Huijun WANG ; Qi SUN ; Zhijian XIAO ; Chengwen LI
Chinese Journal of Medical Genetics 2024;41(7):803-806
Objective:To explore the application of an automatic slide-dropping instrument in bone marrow chromosomal karyotyping.Methods:The effects of manual and automatic dropping methods under different environmental humidity were retrospectively analyzed, and the repeatability of the automatic dropping method was analyzed.Results:No statistical difference was found between the results of automatic and manual dropping methods under the optimum ambient humidity and high humidity ( P>0.05). At low humidity, there was a statistical difference between the two methods ( P<0.05). With regard to the repeatability, the coefficient of variations of the automatic dropping method for the number of split phases, the rate of good dispersion and the rate of overlap were all lower than those of the manual dropping method. A statistical difference was also found in the number of split phases ( P<0.05) but not in the discrete excellent rate and overlapping rate between the two methods ( P>0.05). Conclusion:Better effect can be obtained by the automatic dropping instrument. It is suggested to gradually replace manual work with machine.