BACKGROUNDStatins and ezetimibe have been reported to change the balance of cholesterol metabolism, but few studies have been performed on Chinese patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate changes in cholesterol metabolism markers in patients with coronary heart disease.

METHODSForty-five patients with coronary heart disease were treated with 20 mg/d of simvastatin for four weeks. Subjects were then divided into two different therapy groups according to whether they reached the target values for total cholesterol and low density lipoprotein cholesterol level. Patients who reached the target values remained on simvastatin and those who did not reach the target values took a combination of simvastatin plus 10 mg/d ezetimibe until the 12th week. The concentrations of cholesterol synthesis markers (lathosterol and desmosterol) and absorption markers (campesterol and sitosterol) were measured on the 1st, 4th, and 12th week of the study by gas chromatography.

RESULTSAfter treatment with simvastatin for four weeks, the levels of total cholesterol and low density lipoprotein cholesterol decreased significantly compared to levels measured during the 1st week (P < 0.05). On the 12th week the levels of total cholesterol and low density lipoprotein cholesterol had decreased significantly (P < 0.001) compared to levels during the 4th week. By the 12th week the levels of campesterol and sitosterol in the combination group had decreased significantly (P < 0.05) compared with levels measured during the 4th week.

CONCLUSIONSCoronary heart disease patients with high cholesterol synthesis at baseline might gain a greater benefit from simvastatin treatment. Combination therapy with simvastatin plus ezetimibe in patients with low cholesterol synthesis at baseline might increase the success rate of lipid-lowering through decreasing the absorption of cholesterol.

Adult ; Aged ; Azetidines ; administration & dosage ; Cholesterol ; metabolism ; Cholesterol, LDL ; blood ; Coronary Disease ; drug therapy ; metabolism ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Ezetimibe ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Simvastatin ; administration & dosage

OBJECTIVETo evaluate the role of Jiangzhi Xiaoban Tablet (JXT) in improving heartfunction of coronary heart disease (CHD) patients by tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) and speckle trackingimaging (STI) technology.

METHODSRecruited were 60 inpatients with confirmed CHD by coronary angiography at First Affiliated Hospital, Hunan University of Traditional Chinese Medicine from October 2013to November 2014. They were assigned to the treatment group (group A) and the control group (groupB) according to random digit table, 30 cases in each group. Patients in group A took JXT, 0.45 g/tablet,4 tablets each time, 3 times per day, while those in group B took Simvastatin Tablet, 20 mg/tablet, 1 tablet each time, once per evening. The therapeutic course for all was 8 weeks. The long axis view of theheart of 18 segments STI Peak strain LS and TDI peak systolic Sa parameters were performed in all patients before and after treatment.

RESULTSBefore treatment segments of STI strain LS and TDI longitudinal peak systolic peak Sa were not statistically different between the two groups (P > 0.05). Each segment of STI peak longitudinal strain LS and TDI peak systolic Sa in the two groups were higher after treatment than before treatment (P < 0.05). After treatment each segment of STI parameters of LS and eachTDI segment parameters of Sa were significantly lower in group B than in group A (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONJXT could improve heart function of CHD patients to different degrees, and its curative effect was betterthan that of routine Western medicine (Simvastatin Tablets) treatment.

Coronary Artery Disease ; drug therapy ; Drugs, Chinese Herbal ; administration & dosage ; therapeutic use ; Echocardiography, Doppler ; Heart ; drug effects ; Humans ; Simvastatin ; therapeutic use ; Tablets

Cardiovascular disease due to atherosclerosis is a leading cause of death around the world, including Singapore. Current treatment strategies primarily target low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels. Low levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol and high triglyceride (TG) levels have been shown to increase the risk of coronary heart disease, but the clinical benefits of raising low HDL cholesterol have only been proven in a limited number of studies. This guide provides an approach on managing low HDL cholesterol levels in terms of lifestyle modifications and pharmacotherapy.
Coronary Disease ; prevention & control ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Exercise ; Fenofibrate ; administration & dosage ; Humans ; Hypertriglyceridemia ; drug therapy ; therapy ; Hypoalphalipoproteinemias ; drug therapy ; therapy ; Hypolipidemic Agents ; administration & dosage ; Life Style ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Simvastatin ; administration & dosage

OBJECTIVEThe aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combination therapy with simvastatin and fenofibrate in patients with combined hyperlipidemia.

METHODSA total of 221 patients with combined hyperlipidemia were randomly assigned to receive 10 mg simvastatin (n = 72) or 200 mg fenofibrate (n = 68), or a combination of 10 mg simvastatin + 200 mg fenofibrate (n = 81) for 6 months. Lipid profiles, physical and laboratory investigations for adverse effects were assessed.

RESULTS(1) Combination treatment were more effective in normalizing lipid profile than any monotherapy. Serum TC, LDL-C, and TG were reduced by 30%, 37% and 56% respectively, whilst HDL-C significantly increased by 24% (all P < 0.01). The improvement in TG and HDL-C achieved by combination treatment was superior to fenofibrate or simvastatin alone. (2) The success rate of TC, LDL-C and TG control in the combination therapy group were 51%, 55% and 61% respectively, with an overall success rate (all three together) of 45%, which was superior to either drug given as monotherapy. (3) All treatments were well tolerated with no increase in adverse events for combination therapy versus monotherapy.

CONCLUSIONThe results of this study demonstrated that combination therapy with fenofibrate (200 mg/day) and low-dose simvastatin (10 mg/day) is more effective than monotherapy in patients with combined hyperlipidemia, and is generally safe and well tolerated.

Drug Therapy, Combination ; Female ; Fenofibrate ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Humans ; Hyperlipoproteinemia Type V ; drug therapy ; Hypolipidemic Agents ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Simvastatin ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use

OBJECTIVETo observe the effect of simvastatin carried by poly (lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) on residual ridge resorption following tooth extraction.

METHODSSixty male Wistar rats were divided into experimental groups and control groups (30 rats/group). PLGA was immediately implanted with or without simvastatin into extraction sockets of the mandibular incisors. Soft X-ray photography, bone mineral density (BMD) and histopathologic study were conducted at 7, 14, 28, 56, and 84 days after implantation.

RESULTSThe relative length values of residual alveolar ridge of the experimental groups were greater than those of the controls at 14, 28, 56, and 84 days after implantation, and there was a significant difference between the experimental and control groups (P < 0.05). The BMD of the specific region was higher in the experimental groups [(7.101 +/- 0.025), (7.178 +/- 0.039), and (7.162 +/- 0.052) g/cm(2)] than that in the control groups [(7.074 +/- 0.014), (7.117 +/- 0.012), and (7.059 +/- 0.037) g/cm(2)] (P < 0.05) after 28, 56, and 84 days. Light microscopy showed that bone formation rate and quality of the experimental group were better than those in the control group at the same time.

CONCLUSIONSSimvastatin carried by PLGA could induce bone formation of tooth socket. Local application of simvastatin would be potential to preserve the length and bone volume of alveolar ridge after tooth extraction.

Alveolar Bone Loss ; prevention & control ; Alveolar Process ; pathology ; Animals ; Lactic Acid ; administration & dosage ; therapeutic use ; Male ; Polyglycolic Acid ; administration & dosage ; therapeutic use ; Rats ; Rats, Wistar ; Simvastatin ; administration & dosage ; therapeutic use ; Tooth Extraction

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The efficacy and safety of a combination of ezetimibe and low-dose statin as primary treatment for dyslipidemia in renal transplant patients were evaluated prospectively. METHODS: The study enrolled 77 renal transplant recipients with dyslipidemia. They were given ezetimibe (10 mg) and simvastatin (10 mg) for 6 months as the initial treatment for dyslipidemia. Efficacy and safety were evaluated using lipid profiles, trough calcineurin inhibitor levels, allograft function, and adverse effects. The effects on proteinuria and high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) levels were also evaluated. RESULTS: Ezetimibe and low-dose simvastatin significantly decreased the levels of total cholesterol (34.6%), triglyceride (16.0%), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) (47.6%), and 82.5% of the patients reached the target LDL-C level of <100 mg/dL. No significant change in the trough calcineurin inhibitor levels or allograft function occurred, and no serious adverse effects were observed. Fourteen patients (18.2%) discontinued treatment; eight patients (11.7%) developed muscle pain or weakness without an increase in creatinine kinase levels, and two patients (2.6%) developed elevated liver transaminase levels. The proteinuria and hsCRP levels did not change significantly. CONCLUSIONS: Ezetimibe and low-dose statin treatment is safe and effective as a primary treatment for dyslipidemia in renal transplant patients.
Adult ; Azetidines/*administration & dosage/adverse effects ; C-Reactive Protein/analysis ; Cholesterol, LDL/blood ; Dyslipidemias/blood/*drug therapy ; Female ; Humans ; Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/*administration & dosage ; *Kidney Transplantation ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Prospective Studies ; Simvastatin/*administration & dosage/adverse effects

OBJECTIVELandmark trials have demonstrated that statins can reduce the risk of coronary events. Despite the widespread use of statins in the settings of primary and secondary prevention of CHD, withdrawal of statins is a frequent problem in clinical practice. Several recent clinical studies have suggested that withdrawal of statin therapy might be associated with an increase in thrombotic vascular events and the onset of acute coronary syndromes. However, the effects of discontinuing of statins treatment on endothelial function and underlying mechanism are unknown. Objectives We investigated the effects after withdrawal of simvastatin on brachial artery endothelial function in patients unreached cholesterol target with coronary heart disease (CHD) or CHD risk factors.

METHODSWe included 33 patients with established CHD or CHD risk factors, whose serum cholesterol did not achieve NCEP target level. They were administered simvastatin (20 mg) for 4 weeks. Endothelial dependent flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD) was assessed in the brachial artery using high-resolution ultrasound at baseline, after 4 weeks of simvastatin and after termination of therapy 1 week. We evaluated fasting serum lipid profiles and vasoactive substances simultaneously, included nitric oxide (NO), endothelin (ET), 6-keto-PGF1(alpha) and thromboxane B(2) (TXB(2)), which were measured as plasma prostacyclin and TXA(2) respectively.

RESULTSSimvastatin treatment reduced low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and total cholesterol (TC) levels and improved endothelial-dependent vasodilation in patients after 4 weeks. Withdrawal of simvastatin, however, FMD showed a significant reduction [(4.82 +/- 0.71)% vs (11.51 +/- 0.87)%, P < 0.01], that remained in low level after 1 week, and the FMD were even lower than the baseline values [(4.82 +/- 0.71)% vs (5.89 +/- 0.65)%, P < 0.01]. After terminating simvastatin treatment, serum NO and plasma 6-keto-PGF1(alpha) levels decreased, as well as plasma ET and serum LDL-C levels increased. But there was no significant difference between plasma TXB(2) levels before and after withdrawal of simvastatin (P > 0.05). Overall, there were significant positive correlations between withdrawal-induced changes in FMD and serum NO level (r = 0.674, P = 0.004), whereas no correlations were shown between the changes in FMD and serum LDL-C level (r = -0.414, P = 0.083).

CONCLUSIONSAbrupt withdrawal of simvastatin therapy resulted in the significant adverse impact on brachial artery endothelial function in patients unreached cholesterol target with CHD or CHD risk factors. Termination of therapy may suppress endothelial NO production and impair endothelial function that is independent of lipid-lowering effect.

Aged ; Brachial Artery ; drug effects ; Cholesterol, LDL ; blood ; Coronary Disease ; drug therapy ; physiopathology ; Endothelium, Vascular ; physiopathology ; Female ; Humans ; Hypolipidemic Agents ; administration & dosage ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Nitric Oxide ; blood ; Risk Factors ; Simvastatin ; administration & dosage ; Vasodilation

The aim of this study was to examine the anti-proliferative and anti-inflammatory effects of ezetimibe/simvastatin (E/S) after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation in a porcine coronary restenosis model. Pigs were randomized into two groups in which the coronary arteries (23 pigs) had DES. Stents were deployed with oversizing (stent/artery ratio 1.3:1) in porcine coronary arteries. Fifteen pigs were taken 10/20 mg of E/S and eight pigs were not taken E/S. Histopathologic analysis was assessed at 28 days after stenting. In neointima, most inflammatory cells were lymphohistiocytes. Lymphohistiocyte count was not different between two groups (337+/-227 vs. 443+/-366 cells, P=0.292), but neointima area was significantly smaller (1.00+/-0.49 mm2 vs. 1.69+/-0.98 mm2, P=0.021) and percent area stenosis was significantly lower (23.3+/-10% vs. 39+/-19%, P=0.007) in E/S group compared with control group. There were no significant differences in fibrin score (1.99+/-0.79 vs. 1.81+/-0.88, P=0.49), endothelial score (1.75+/-0.66 vs. 1.80+/-0.59, P=0.79), and the percent of endothelium covered lumen (43+/-21% vs. 45+/-21%, P=0.84) between E/S group and control group. Combined therapy with ezetimibe and simvastatin inhibits neointimal hyperplasia, but does not inhibit inflammatory infiltration and arterial healing after DES implantation in a porcine coronary restenosis model.
Animals ; Anticholesteremic Agents/administration & dosage ; Azetidines/*administration & dosage ; Coronary Restenosis/diagnosis/drug therapy/*etiology ; *Disease Models, Animal ; Drug Combinations ; Drug Implants/administration & dosage ; Drug-Eluting Stents/*adverse effects ; Female ; Graft Occlusion, Vascular/diagnosis/*drug therapy/*etiology ; Humans ; Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/administration & dosage ; Simvastatin/*administration & dosage ; Swine ; Treatment Outcome

HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) are widely used to treat hypercholesterolemia. Among the adverse effects associated with these drugs are statin-associated myopathies, ranging from asymptomatic elevation of serum creatine kinase to fatal rhabdomyolysis. Fluvastatin-induced fatal rhabdomyolysis has not been previously reported. We describe here a patient with liver cirrhosis who experienced fluvastatin-induced fatal rhabdomyolysis. This patient had been treated with simvastatin (20 mg/day) for coronary artery disease and was switched to fluvastatin (20 mg/day) 10 days before admission. He was also taking aspirin, betaxolol, candesartan, lactulose, and entecavir. Rhabdomyolysis was complicated and continued to progress. He was treated with massive hydration, urine alkalization, intravenous furosemide, and continuous renal replacement therapy for acute renal failure, but eventually died due to rhabdomyolysis complicated by hepatic failure. In conclusion, fluvastatin should be used with caution in patients with liver cirrhosis, especially with other medications metabolized with CYP2C9.
Coronary Artery Disease/complications/*drug therapy ; Fatal Outcome ; Fatty Acids, Monounsaturated/administration & dosage/*adverse effects/therapeutic use ; Humans ; Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/administration & dosage/*adverse effects/therapeutic use ; Indoles/administration & dosage/*adverse effects/therapeutic use ; Liver Cirrhosis/*complications ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Rhabdomyolysis/*chemically induced ; Simvastatin/administration & dosage/therapeutic use

PURPOSE: The effects of short-term intensive lipid-lowering treatment on coronary plaque composition have not yet been sufficiently evaluated. We investigated the influence of short-term intensive lipid-lowering treatment on quantitative and qualitative changes in plaque components of non-culprit lesions in patients with acute coronary syndrome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized, open-label, single-center trial. Seventy patients who underwent both baseline and three-month follow-up virtual histology intravascular ultrasound were randomly assigned to either an intensive lipid-lowering treatment group (ezetimibe/simvastatin 10/40 mg, n=34) or a control statin treatment group (pravastatin 20 mg, n=36). Using virtual histology intravascular ultrasound, plaque was characterized as fibrous, fibro-fatty, dense calcium, or necrotic core. Changes in plaque components during the three-month lipid-lowering treatment were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Compared with the control statin treatment group, there was a significant reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in the intensive lipid-lowering treatment group (-20.4±17.1 mg/dL vs. -36.8±17.4 mg/dL, respectively; p<0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in baseline, three-month follow-up, or serial changes of gray-scale intravascular ultrasound parameters between the two groups. The absolute volume of fibro-fatty plaque was significantly reduced in the intensive lipid-lowering treatment group compared with the control group (-1.5±3.4 mm3 vs. 0.8±4.7 mm3, respectively; p=0.024). A linear correlation was found between changes in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and changes in the absolute volumes of fibro-fatty plaque (p<0.001, R2=0.209). CONCLUSION: Modification of coronary plaque may be attainable after only three months of intensive lipid-lowering treatment.
Aged ; Cholesterol, LDL/*blood/drug effects ; Coronary Artery Disease/*diagnostic imaging ; Drug Administration Schedule ; Ezetimibe, Simvastatin Drug Combination/*administration & dosage ; Female ; Humans ; Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/*administration & dosage ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Plaque, Atherosclerotic/*diagnostic imaging ; Pravastatin/administration & dosage ; Prospective Studies ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome ; Ultrasonography, Interventional