Health law teaching exists deficiencies in training students' practical ability while moot court has obvious advantages in this area and it is feasible. Specific program can be established from the following four aspects:curriculum mode,selection of cases,teaching methods and evalua-tion system.

There are three systems to protect the geographical indications of genuine medical materials in present China, which easily leads to the right-conflicts among several geographical indications rights. The situation is not reasonable, but is legitimate in the current legal system. So we should start from the present legislation and learn from foreign experience to resolve it step by step. To be specific, in the short term, we should strengthen propaganda and alter the existing logos to reduce the possibility of consumer confusion. Meanwhile, we should annul or revoke the registration of the improperly registered geographical indications. In the medium term, we should make some amendments to the legislation, that is, to give priorities to geographical indication products. At last, we should change the three systems into a single protection mode on the basis of the geographical indication products system.

Legal clinic education originating in the United States, aims at educating students on legal practical skills, and plays an positive role in cultivating students' ability of integrating theory with practice and training their various practical vocational skills. The present Chinese training mode of health law specialty does not perform very well in training students' practical ability, while legal clinic education can better make up for some deficiencies. Therefore, this paper learns from the experience of American universities in their legal clinic education, such as the particular division of specialties, the development of outside-school clinics, taking pre-training seriously, and the unique evaluation mechanism. Correspondingly, we explore to construct a set of reasonable legal clinic education system in health law specialty, including the orientation of legal clinics, the double training system inside and outside school, the construction of teaching staff and the establishment of evaluation mechanism.

OBJECTIVE To provide ideas and inspiration for promoting the development of the generic drug industry and legal system of China. METHODS With text analysis， empirical research and other methods， the competitive generic drug incentive system in the United States was combed， its implementation effect and successful experience were analyzed， and the reference was provided for the implementation of relevant systems in China. RESULTS The competitive generic drug incentive system in the United States had achieved a satisfactory effect in three aspects： encouraging generic drug applications， accelerating the listing of generic drugs， and promoting drug price reduction， which was ultimately conducive to improving drug accessibility by publishing List of Off-Patent，Off-Exclusivity Drugs without an Approved Generic， while accelerating the development and review of generic drugs with insufficient competition and giving market exclusivity periods. CONCLUSIONS China’s reference to the competitive generic drug incentive system in the United States meets the needs of the current situation of domestic drug supply and also has the basis for industry practice. Therefore， we can refer to it， improve the system of releasing the catalog of encouraged generic drugs to be imitated， optimize the approval process for them， and authorize the exclusive period incentive to them.