1.Comparison of the application effect of Warm-water or Carbon Dioxide Insufflation in difficult colonoscopy
Sihui HOU ; Yan WANG ; Xiaohong WANG ; Jianqiu MENG ; Manman ZHANG
China Journal of Endoscopy 2024;30(11):47-52
Objective To compare the safety and clinical value of warm-water infusion or carbon dioxide(CO2)insufflation in difficult colonoscopy.Methods A collection of 150 patients from May 2021 to October 2023 who underwent unsedated and difficult colonoscopy were randomly divided into warm-water insufflation group(W group,n=50),CO2 insufflation group(C group,n=50)and air insufflation group(A group,n=50).Record the cecal insertion time,the abdominal pain score during the examination and 20 min and 1 h after the examination,the success rate of intubation,the polyps detection rate,the willingness to re-examine and the need for assistance in the three groups.Some patients were randomly selected to record partial pressure of end-tidal carbon dioxide(PetCO2)of pre-examination,the ileocecal and 20 min after the examination to understand CO2 retention in the body.Results The cecal insertion time of group A was longer than that of group W and group C,and group W was shorter than group C.The abdominal pain score of group A was higher than that of group W and group C at each time point,and the abdominal pain score during the examination was lower in the group W compared with group C.The success rate of intubation and the willingness to re-examination in the group A were lower than those in group W and group C,The above differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).However,there was no statistical difference between the the group W and group C in terms of success rate of intubation,willingness to re-examine,and abdominal pain score at 20 minutes and 1 hour after the examination(P>0.05).In the group W,significantly fewer patients required abdominal compression compared with the other two groups,and the rate of position conversion was significantly lower than that in group A(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the detection rate of polyps among the three groups(P>0.05).In addition,PetCO2 of group C was within the normal range at all time points,and there was no statistical difference compared with the group A(P>0.05).Conclusion Compared with the air group,water or CO2 insufflation colonoscopy is safe and has a high success rate in difficult colonoscopy.It can reduce the patient's abdominal discomfort,especially water insufflation colonoscopy is more suitable for promotion in primary hospitals.
2.Expression of neural precursor cell expressed developmentally downregulated 4-1 in pancreatic cancer tissue and its clinical significance
Tingting BI ; Sihui HOU ; Yan LIU
Journal of Clinical Hepatology 2022;38(3):617-621
Objective To investigate the expression of the E3 ubiquitin ligase neural precursor cell expressed developmentally downregulated 4-1 (NEDD4-1) in pancreatic cancer tissue and its clinical significance. Methods Clinical data were collected from 58 patients who underwent surgical treatment in Xuzhou Central Hospital from January 2017 to December 2019 and were diagnosed with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma based on pathological examination. Immunohistochemistry was used to measure the expression of NEDD4-1 in pancreatic cancer tissue samples, and the association between the expression of NEDD4-1 and the clinicopathological features of pancreatic cancer was analyzed. Western blot was used to measure the protein expression level of NEDD4-1 in normal pancreatic ductal epithelial HPDE6-C7 cells and pancreatic cancer SW1990, BxPC-3, and PANC-1 cells. The t -test was used for comparison of continuous data between two groups, and the chi-square test was used for comparison of categorical data between two groups. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to plot survival curves, and the log-rank test was used for survival analysis. The Cox proportional-hazards regression model was used to investigate the factors associated with prognosis. Results The expression level of NEDD4-1 in pancreatic cancer tissue was significantly higher than that in adjacent tissue (79.31% vs 19.05%, χ 2 =35.614, P < 0.01), and the protein expression of NEDD4-1 in pancreatic cancer cells was significantly higher than that in normal pancreatic ductal epithelial cells ( P < 0.01). In the patients with pancreatic cancer, the expression of NEDD4-1 was associated with distant metastasis ( χ 2 =5.089, P =0.040), tumor differentiation ( χ 2 =9.071, P =0.003), and TNM stage ( χ 2 =8.882, P =0.003). The patients with high NEDD4-1 expression had a significantly shorter mean survival time than those with low expression (13.61±0.95 months vs 22.22±2.20 months, P =0.001). The Cox regression analysis showed that NEDD4-1 expression (hazard ratio [ HR ]=2.312, 95% confidence interval [ CI ]: 1.010-5.295, P =0.047), degree of tumor differentiation ( HR =2.981, 95% CI : 1.556-5.712, P =0.001), and lymph node metastasis ( HR =2.144, 95% CI : 1.155-3.979, P =0.016) were independent risk factors for the prognosis of patients with pancreatic cancer. Conclusion There is a significant increase in the expression of NEDD4-1 in pancreatic cancer tissue and cells, and the high expression of NEDD4-1 is associated with poor prognosis. Therefore, it can be used as a prognostic biomarker and a therapeutic target for pancreatic cancer.