ObjectiveTo evaluate the potential value of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) imaging in the diagnosis of aortic intramural hematoma (AIH).MethodsFrom September 2002 to May 2005,a consecutive series of 15 patients with suspected aortic dissection (AD) underwent both IVUS imaging and spiral computed tomography (CT).Six patients diagnosed as acute type B AIH by CT or IVUS composed the present study group.ResultsThe study group consisted of five males and one female with mean age of 66 years old.All of them had chest or back pain.In one patient,CT omitted a localized AIH and an associated penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer (PAU),which were detected by IVUS.In another patient,CT mistaken a partly thrombosed false lumen as an AIH,whereas IVUS detected a subtle intimal tear and slow moving blood in the false lumen.In the four rest patients,both CT and IVUS made the diagnosis of AIH,however,IVUS detected three PAUs in three of them,only one of them was also detected by CT,and two of them escaped initial CT and were confirmed by follow up CT or magnetic resonance imaging.ConclusionsIVUS imaging is a safe examination and has high accuracy in the diagnosis of AIH,particularly for diagnosing localized AIH,distinguishing AIH with thrombosed classic AD and detecting accompanied small PAUs.

BACKGROUNDThe value of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) imaging in patients with replacement of the ascending aorta for acute type A aortic dissection (AD) is unknown. The purpose of this study was to assess the potential use of IVUS imaging in this setting.

METHODSFrom September 2002 to July 2005, IVUS imaging with a 9 MHz probe was performed in a series of 16 consecutive patients with suspected or established AD. This study focused on 5 of them with replacement of the ascending aorta for acute type A AD. Among these 5 patients, other imaging modalities including aortography, spiral computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and transesophageal echocardiography were performed in 5, 3, 3 and 1 patients, respectively.

RESULTSThere were no complications related to IVUS imaging. For the replaced graft, as other imaging modalities, IVUS could identify all 5 grafts, the proximal and the distal anastomoses, and the ostia of the reimplanted coronary arteries. In 2 cases, IVUS detected 2 peri-graft pseudo-aneurysms (1 per case), which were also detected by magnetic resonance imaging but omitted by aortography. For the residual dissection, IVUS had similar findings as other imaging modalities in detecting the patency (5/5), the longitudinal and the circumferential extent, the thrombus (4/5), the recurrent dissection (1/5) and an aneurysm distal to the graft (5 in 4 patients). However, it detected more intimal tears and side branch involvements than other imaging modalities (15 vs 10 and 3 vs 1, respectively).

CONCLUSIONSIn following-up patients with replacement of the ascending aorta for acute type A AD, IVUS imaging can provide complete information of the replaced graft and the residual dissection. So, IVUS imaging may be considered when the four current frequently used imaging modalities can not supply sufficient information or there are some discrepancies between them.

Acute Disease ; Aged ; Aneurysm, Dissecting ; diagnostic imaging ; surgery ; Aorta ; diagnostic imaging ; surgery ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Prospective Studies ; Ultrasonography, Interventional