1.Clinical effect of azithromycin adjuvant therapy in children with bronchiolitis: a systematic review and Meta analysis.
Si-Yi CHE ; Huan HE ; Yu DENG ; En-Mei LIU
Chinese Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics 2019;21(8):812-819
OBJECTIVE:
To systematically evaluate the clinical effect of azithromycin (AZM) adjuvant therapy in children with bronchiolitis.
METHODS:
Related databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on AZM adjuvant therapy in children with bronchiolitis published up to February 17, 2019. RevMan 5.3 was used to perform the Meta analysis.
RESULTS:
A total of 14 RCTs were included, with 667 children in the intervention group and 651 in the control group. The pooled effect size showed that in the children with bronchiolitis, AZM adjuvant therapy did not shorten the length of hospital stay (MD=-0.29, 95%CI: -0.62 to 0.04, P=0.08) or oxygen supply time (MD=-0.33, 95%CI: -0.73 to 0.07, P=0.10), while it significantly shortened the time to the relief of wheezing (MD=-1.00, 95%CI: -1.72 to -0.28, P=0.007) and cough (MD=-0.48, 95%CI: -0.67 to -0.29, P<0.00001). The analysis of bacterial colonization revealed that AZM therapy significantly reduced the detection rates of Streptococcus pneumoniae (OR=0.24, 95%CI: 0.11-0.54, P=0.0006), Haemophilus (OR=0.28, 95%CI: 0.14-0.55, P=0.0002), and Moraxella catarrhalis (OR=0.21, 95%CI: 0.11-0.40, P<0.00001) in the nasopharyngeal region.
CONCLUSIONS
AZM adjuvant therapy can reduce the time to the relief of wheezing and cough in children with bronchiolitis, but it has no marked effect on the length of hospital stay and oxygen supply time.
Azithromycin
;
therapeutic use
;
Bronchiolitis
;
drug therapy
;
Child
;
Combined Modality Therapy
;
Humans
;
Length of Stay
;
Respiratory Sounds
2.Gene cloning and immunogenicity analysis of the structural proteins VP1-VP4 of enterovirus 71.
Yuan-bin SONG ; Nan YU ; Si-jie HE ; Xin-xin CHEN ; Bin WANG ; Xiao-yan CHE ; Qi-yi ZENG
Journal of Southern Medical University 2011;31(11):1846-1850
OBJECTIVETo clone the genes encoding the structural proteins VP1-VP4 of enterovirus 71 and investigate the immunogenicity of the expressed recombinant proteins.
METHODSThe VP1-VP4 cDNAs were amplified by RT-PCR from the extracted viral RNA and cloned into pMD19-T vector. The cloned VP1-VP4 genes were then inserted into the multi-cloning sites of plasmid pQE30a and expressed in E. coli M15 with IPTG induction. After washing with 8 mol/L urea and purification with Ni-affinity chromatography, the recombinant proteins obtained were tested for immunogenicity by Western blotting and ELISA using rabbit antisera against enterovirus 71 and Coxsackie Virus A16.
RESULTSThe recombinant VP1-VP4 proteins were highly expressed in E. coli M15 and the purified proteins could be specifically recognized by the rabbit sera against enterovirus 71.
CONCLUSIONThe expressed enterovirus 71 structural proteins show good immunogenicity and can be used for developing enterovirus 71 vaccine and detection kits.
Animals ; Capsid Proteins ; biosynthesis ; genetics ; immunology ; Cloning, Molecular ; Enterovirus A, Human ; genetics ; immunology ; Enterovirus Infections ; virology ; Escherichia coli ; genetics ; metabolism ; Humans ; Immunogenetic Phenomena ; Mice ; Rabbits ; Recombinant Proteins ; biosynthesis ; genetics ; immunology