Nerve growth factor (NGF) is a neurotrophic factor usually involved in the survival, differentiation, and growth of sensory neurons and nociceptive function. Yet, it has been suggested to play a role in the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis (OA). Previous studies suggested a possible relationship between NGF and OA; however, the underlying mechanisms remain unknown. Therefore, we investigated the impact of NGF in chondrogenesis using human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs)-derived chondrogenic pellets. To investigate how NGF affects the cartilage tissue, hiPSC-derived chondrogenic pellets were treated with NGF on day 3 of differentiation, expression of chondrogenic, hypertrophic, and fibrotic markers was confirmed. Also, inflammatory cytokine arrays were performed using the culture medium of the NGF treated chondrogenic pellets. As a result, NGF treatment decreased the expression of pro-chondrogenic markers by approximately 2∼4 times, and hypertrophic (pro-osteogenic) markers and fibrotic markers were increased by approximately 3-fold or more in the NGF-treated cartilaginous pellets. In addition, angiogenesis was upregulated by approximately 4-fold or more, bone formation by more than 2-fold, and matrix metalloproteinase induction by more than 2-fold. These inflammatory cytokine array were using the NGF-treated chondrogenic pellet cultured medium.Furthermore, it was confirmed by Western blot to be related to the induction of the glycogen synthase kinase-3 beta (GSK3β) pathway by NGF. In Conclusions, these findings provide valuable insights into the multifaceted role of NGF in cartilage hypertrophy and fibrosis, which might play a critical role in OA progression.

Nerve growth factor (NGF) is a neurotrophic factor usually involved in the survival, differentiation, and growth of sensory neurons and nociceptive function. Yet, it has been suggested to play a role in the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis (OA). Previous studies suggested a possible relationship between NGF and OA; however, the underlying mechanisms remain unknown. Therefore, we investigated the impact of NGF in chondrogenesis using human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs)-derived chondrogenic pellets. To investigate how NGF affects the cartilage tissue, hiPSC-derived chondrogenic pellets were treated with NGF on day 3 of differentiation, expression of chondrogenic, hypertrophic, and fibrotic markers was confirmed. Also, inflammatory cytokine arrays were performed using the culture medium of the NGF treated chondrogenic pellets. As a result, NGF treatment decreased the expression of pro-chondrogenic markers by approximately 2∼4 times, and hypertrophic (pro-osteogenic) markers and fibrotic markers were increased by approximately 3-fold or more in the NGF-treated cartilaginous pellets. In addition, angiogenesis was upregulated by approximately 4-fold or more, bone formation by more than 2-fold, and matrix metalloproteinase induction by more than 2-fold. These inflammatory cytokine array were using the NGF-treated chondrogenic pellet cultured medium.Furthermore, it was confirmed by Western blot to be related to the induction of the glycogen synthase kinase-3 beta (GSK3β) pathway by NGF. In Conclusions, these findings provide valuable insights into the multifaceted role of NGF in cartilage hypertrophy and fibrosis, which might play a critical role in OA progression.

Nerve growth factor (NGF) is a neurotrophic factor usually involved in the survival, differentiation, and growth of sensory neurons and nociceptive function. Yet, it has been suggested to play a role in the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis (OA). Previous studies suggested a possible relationship between NGF and OA; however, the underlying mechanisms remain unknown. Therefore, we investigated the impact of NGF in chondrogenesis using human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs)-derived chondrogenic pellets. To investigate how NGF affects the cartilage tissue, hiPSC-derived chondrogenic pellets were treated with NGF on day 3 of differentiation, expression of chondrogenic, hypertrophic, and fibrotic markers was confirmed. Also, inflammatory cytokine arrays were performed using the culture medium of the NGF treated chondrogenic pellets. As a result, NGF treatment decreased the expression of pro-chondrogenic markers by approximately 2∼4 times, and hypertrophic (pro-osteogenic) markers and fibrotic markers were increased by approximately 3-fold or more in the NGF-treated cartilaginous pellets. In addition, angiogenesis was upregulated by approximately 4-fold or more, bone formation by more than 2-fold, and matrix metalloproteinase induction by more than 2-fold. These inflammatory cytokine array were using the NGF-treated chondrogenic pellet cultured medium.Furthermore, it was confirmed by Western blot to be related to the induction of the glycogen synthase kinase-3 beta (GSK3β) pathway by NGF. In Conclusions, these findings provide valuable insights into the multifaceted role of NGF in cartilage hypertrophy and fibrosis, which might play a critical role in OA progression.

OBJECTIVES: Long-term care facilities (LTCFs) are communal environments for patients with chronic diseases or older adults, making them particularly susceptible to significant harm during infectious disease outbreaks. Nonetheless, LTCFs have historically been subject to less stringent infection prevention and control (IPC) mandates. This study aimed to assess the current state of LTCFs and to develop an IPC system tailored for these facilities following the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. METHODS: We conducted an online survey of 11,366 LTCFs in Korea from December 30, 2022 to January 20, 2023, to evaluate the components of IPC in LTCFs. The infectious diseases targeted for IPC included COVID-19, influenza, and scabies. Additionally, we compared institution-based and home-based long-term care insurance facilities. RESULTS: Overall, 3,537 (31.1%) LTCFs responded to the survey, comprising 1,819 (51.4%) institution-based and 1,718 (48.6%) home-based facilities. A majority (87.4%, 2,376/2,720) of these facilities experienced COVID-19 outbreaks. However, only 42.2% of home-based facilities, in contrast to 90.6% of institution-based facilities, were equipped to manage concurrent COVID-19 cases. Similarly, while 92.1% of institution-based facilities were capable of managing influenza, only 50.5% of home-based facilities could do the same. The incidence of scabies was significantly higher in institution-based facilities than in home-based ones (26.1 vs. 4.3%). Additionally, 88.7% of institution-based facilities managed scabies cases effectively, compared to only 42.1% of home-based facilities. CONCLUSIONS Approximately half of the LTCFs had a basic capacity to respond to infectious diseases. However, there were differences in response capabilities between institution-based facilities and home-based facilities.

Tattooing is an invasive procedure that involves the introduction of permanent pigments into the dermis, and is categorized as a medical procedure in Korea. Despite the medical, cosmetic, and aesthetic purposes of tattooing, legislative proposals to allow non-medical personnel to perform tattooing have consistently been rejected on public health grounds, prioritizing health and safety considerations. Professional organizations have maintained a consistent position, highlighting the risks of allowing non-medical individuals to perform tattooing. These risks include procedural complications, use of unsafe practices, and inadequate legal frameworks to ensure accountability.Addressing such issues requires careful consideration beyond economic or convenience factors, with an emphasis on public health policies. To address these concerns, the Korean Dermatological Research Foundation convened its 1st Policy Forum on October 6, 2024. The forum discussed the safety aspects, medical complications, and legal implications of tattooing performed by non-medical personnel. These findings highlight the significant risks and regulatory gaps associated with such practices, underscoring the need for a comprehensive review and stringent regulations to protect public health.

Tattooing is an invasive procedure that involves the introduction of permanent pigments into the dermis, and is categorized as a medical procedure in Korea. Despite the medical, cosmetic, and aesthetic purposes of tattooing, legislative proposals to allow non-medical personnel to perform tattooing have consistently been rejected on public health grounds, prioritizing health and safety considerations. Professional organizations have maintained a consistent position, highlighting the risks of allowing non-medical individuals to perform tattooing. These risks include procedural complications, use of unsafe practices, and inadequate legal frameworks to ensure accountability.Addressing such issues requires careful consideration beyond economic or convenience factors, with an emphasis on public health policies. To address these concerns, the Korean Dermatological Research Foundation convened its 1st Policy Forum on October 6, 2024. The forum discussed the safety aspects, medical complications, and legal implications of tattooing performed by non-medical personnel. These findings highlight the significant risks and regulatory gaps associated with such practices, underscoring the need for a comprehensive review and stringent regulations to protect public health.

OBJECTIVES: Long-term care facilities (LTCFs) are communal environments for patients with chronic diseases or older adults, making them particularly susceptible to significant harm during infectious disease outbreaks. Nonetheless, LTCFs have historically been subject to less stringent infection prevention and control (IPC) mandates. This study aimed to assess the current state of LTCFs and to develop an IPC system tailored for these facilities following the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. METHODS: We conducted an online survey of 11,366 LTCFs in Korea from December 30, 2022 to January 20, 2023, to evaluate the components of IPC in LTCFs. The infectious diseases targeted for IPC included COVID-19, influenza, and scabies. Additionally, we compared institution-based and home-based long-term care insurance facilities. RESULTS: Overall, 3,537 (31.1%) LTCFs responded to the survey, comprising 1,819 (51.4%) institution-based and 1,718 (48.6%) home-based facilities. A majority (87.4%, 2,376/2,720) of these facilities experienced COVID-19 outbreaks. However, only 42.2% of home-based facilities, in contrast to 90.6% of institution-based facilities, were equipped to manage concurrent COVID-19 cases. Similarly, while 92.1% of institution-based facilities were capable of managing influenza, only 50.5% of home-based facilities could do the same. The incidence of scabies was significantly higher in institution-based facilities than in home-based ones (26.1 vs. 4.3%). Additionally, 88.7% of institution-based facilities managed scabies cases effectively, compared to only 42.1% of home-based facilities. CONCLUSIONS Approximately half of the LTCFs had a basic capacity to respond to infectious diseases. However, there were differences in response capabilities between institution-based facilities and home-based facilities.

Tattooing is an invasive procedure that involves the introduction of permanent pigments into the dermis, and is categorized as a medical procedure in Korea. Despite the medical, cosmetic, and aesthetic purposes of tattooing, legislative proposals to allow non-medical personnel to perform tattooing have consistently been rejected on public health grounds, prioritizing health and safety considerations. Professional organizations have maintained a consistent position, highlighting the risks of allowing non-medical individuals to perform tattooing. These risks include procedural complications, use of unsafe practices, and inadequate legal frameworks to ensure accountability.Addressing such issues requires careful consideration beyond economic or convenience factors, with an emphasis on public health policies. To address these concerns, the Korean Dermatological Research Foundation convened its 1st Policy Forum on October 6, 2024. The forum discussed the safety aspects, medical complications, and legal implications of tattooing performed by non-medical personnel. These findings highlight the significant risks and regulatory gaps associated with such practices, underscoring the need for a comprehensive review and stringent regulations to protect public health.

OBJECTIVES: Long-term care facilities (LTCFs) are communal environments for patients with chronic diseases or older adults, making them particularly susceptible to significant harm during infectious disease outbreaks. Nonetheless, LTCFs have historically been subject to less stringent infection prevention and control (IPC) mandates. This study aimed to assess the current state of LTCFs and to develop an IPC system tailored for these facilities following the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. METHODS: We conducted an online survey of 11,366 LTCFs in Korea from December 30, 2022 to January 20, 2023, to evaluate the components of IPC in LTCFs. The infectious diseases targeted for IPC included COVID-19, influenza, and scabies. Additionally, we compared institution-based and home-based long-term care insurance facilities. RESULTS: Overall, 3,537 (31.1%) LTCFs responded to the survey, comprising 1,819 (51.4%) institution-based and 1,718 (48.6%) home-based facilities. A majority (87.4%, 2,376/2,720) of these facilities experienced COVID-19 outbreaks. However, only 42.2% of home-based facilities, in contrast to 90.6% of institution-based facilities, were equipped to manage concurrent COVID-19 cases. Similarly, while 92.1% of institution-based facilities were capable of managing influenza, only 50.5% of home-based facilities could do the same. The incidence of scabies was significantly higher in institution-based facilities than in home-based ones (26.1 vs. 4.3%). Additionally, 88.7% of institution-based facilities managed scabies cases effectively, compared to only 42.1% of home-based facilities. CONCLUSIONS Approximately half of the LTCFs had a basic capacity to respond to infectious diseases. However, there were differences in response capabilities between institution-based facilities and home-based facilities.

OBJECTIVES: Long-term care facilities (LTCFs) are communal environments for patients with chronic diseases or older adults, making them particularly susceptible to significant harm during infectious disease outbreaks. Nonetheless, LTCFs have historically been subject to less stringent infection prevention and control (IPC) mandates. This study aimed to assess the current state of LTCFs and to develop an IPC system tailored for these facilities following the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. METHODS: We conducted an online survey of 11,366 LTCFs in Korea from December 30, 2022 to January 20, 2023, to evaluate the components of IPC in LTCFs. The infectious diseases targeted for IPC included COVID-19, influenza, and scabies. Additionally, we compared institution-based and home-based long-term care insurance facilities. RESULTS: Overall, 3,537 (31.1%) LTCFs responded to the survey, comprising 1,819 (51.4%) institution-based and 1,718 (48.6%) home-based facilities. A majority (87.4%, 2,376/2,720) of these facilities experienced COVID-19 outbreaks. However, only 42.2% of home-based facilities, in contrast to 90.6% of institution-based facilities, were equipped to manage concurrent COVID-19 cases. Similarly, while 92.1% of institution-based facilities were capable of managing influenza, only 50.5% of home-based facilities could do the same. The incidence of scabies was significantly higher in institution-based facilities than in home-based ones (26.1 vs. 4.3%). Additionally, 88.7% of institution-based facilities managed scabies cases effectively, compared to only 42.1% of home-based facilities. CONCLUSIONS Approximately half of the LTCFs had a basic capacity to respond to infectious diseases. However, there were differences in response capabilities between institution-based facilities and home-based facilities.