Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicities of skin-directed radiotherapy (RT) in primary cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL). Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 57 CTCL lesions treated with skin-directed RT between January 2000 and December 2022. Lesions were categorized into three distinct groups: early-stage disease treated with local RT, advanced-stage disease treated with local RT, and advanced-stage disease treated with total skin electron beam therapy (TSEBT). Treatment outcomes, including response rates, recurrence patterns, and local progression probability, were assessed for each group. Results: Mycosis fungoides (MF) constituted 90.9% of the advanced-stage pathologies, while CD4+ primary cutaneous small/medium T-cell lymphoproliferative disorder was common in the early stage lesions (55%). Median RT doses were 30.6 Gy, 27 Gy, and 32 Gy for the local RT with early stage, the local RT with advanced stage, and TSEBT with advanced stage, respectively. The complete response rates were high across the groups: 95.5%, 70.8%, and 90.9%, respectively. Seven local recurrences (29.2%) occurred in the local RT group with advanced stage, while seven patients (63.6%) in the TSEBT group experienced local failure. All recurrences were observed in lesions and patients with MF. Acute toxicities were mainly grade 1 or 2, with no grade 3 or higher events. No significant association between RT dose and local progression rates in MF lesions was found. Conclusion Skin-directed RT in CTCL is effective for local control and well-tolerated with less toxicity.

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicities of skin-directed radiotherapy (RT) in primary cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL). Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 57 CTCL lesions treated with skin-directed RT between January 2000 and December 2022. Lesions were categorized into three distinct groups: early-stage disease treated with local RT, advanced-stage disease treated with local RT, and advanced-stage disease treated with total skin electron beam therapy (TSEBT). Treatment outcomes, including response rates, recurrence patterns, and local progression probability, were assessed for each group. Results: Mycosis fungoides (MF) constituted 90.9% of the advanced-stage pathologies, while CD4+ primary cutaneous small/medium T-cell lymphoproliferative disorder was common in the early stage lesions (55%). Median RT doses were 30.6 Gy, 27 Gy, and 32 Gy for the local RT with early stage, the local RT with advanced stage, and TSEBT with advanced stage, respectively. The complete response rates were high across the groups: 95.5%, 70.8%, and 90.9%, respectively. Seven local recurrences (29.2%) occurred in the local RT group with advanced stage, while seven patients (63.6%) in the TSEBT group experienced local failure. All recurrences were observed in lesions and patients with MF. Acute toxicities were mainly grade 1 or 2, with no grade 3 or higher events. No significant association between RT dose and local progression rates in MF lesions was found. Conclusion Skin-directed RT in CTCL is effective for local control and well-tolerated with less toxicity.

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicities of skin-directed radiotherapy (RT) in primary cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL). Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 57 CTCL lesions treated with skin-directed RT between January 2000 and December 2022. Lesions were categorized into three distinct groups: early-stage disease treated with local RT, advanced-stage disease treated with local RT, and advanced-stage disease treated with total skin electron beam therapy (TSEBT). Treatment outcomes, including response rates, recurrence patterns, and local progression probability, were assessed for each group. Results: Mycosis fungoides (MF) constituted 90.9% of the advanced-stage pathologies, while CD4+ primary cutaneous small/medium T-cell lymphoproliferative disorder was common in the early stage lesions (55%). Median RT doses were 30.6 Gy, 27 Gy, and 32 Gy for the local RT with early stage, the local RT with advanced stage, and TSEBT with advanced stage, respectively. The complete response rates were high across the groups: 95.5%, 70.8%, and 90.9%, respectively. Seven local recurrences (29.2%) occurred in the local RT group with advanced stage, while seven patients (63.6%) in the TSEBT group experienced local failure. All recurrences were observed in lesions and patients with MF. Acute toxicities were mainly grade 1 or 2, with no grade 3 or higher events. No significant association between RT dose and local progression rates in MF lesions was found. Conclusion Skin-directed RT in CTCL is effective for local control and well-tolerated with less toxicity.

Purpose: We sought to report the results of 0.625%/0.1 mL of povidone–iodine (PI) intravitreal injection (0.013% PI vitreous concentration) for treating acute endophthalmitis after cataract surgery.Case summary: Case 1 developed acute endophthalmitis one day after cataract surgery. Prompt intervention with PI injection and vitrectomy led to full resolution of inflammation and a visual acuity of 0.8, and the patient remained stable at 10 months. Case 2, a patient with persistent post-cataract inflammation, was treated with PI injection and vitrectomy, resulting in complete resolution of inflammation and improvement of visual acuity to 0.6 by eight months. Case 3 was a diabetic patient who experienced severe acute endophthalmitis.The patient was treated with the above intervention, resulting in full resolution of endophthalmitis; however, he eventually lost vision due to neovascular glaucoma. Case 4 developed recurrent endophthalmitis caused by Achromobacter xylosoxidans after cataract surgery. This patient required multiple vitrectomies, PI injections, and intraocular lens removal, which led to a resolution of inflammation and restoration of visual acuity to 1.0 after 14 months. Conclusions 0.625%/0.1-mL IPI injection followed by vitrectomy was performed in four acute endophthalmitis patients after cataract surgery and were successfully treated.

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicities of skin-directed radiotherapy (RT) in primary cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL). Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 57 CTCL lesions treated with skin-directed RT between January 2000 and December 2022. Lesions were categorized into three distinct groups: early-stage disease treated with local RT, advanced-stage disease treated with local RT, and advanced-stage disease treated with total skin electron beam therapy (TSEBT). Treatment outcomes, including response rates, recurrence patterns, and local progression probability, were assessed for each group. Results: Mycosis fungoides (MF) constituted 90.9% of the advanced-stage pathologies, while CD4+ primary cutaneous small/medium T-cell lymphoproliferative disorder was common in the early stage lesions (55%). Median RT doses were 30.6 Gy, 27 Gy, and 32 Gy for the local RT with early stage, the local RT with advanced stage, and TSEBT with advanced stage, respectively. The complete response rates were high across the groups: 95.5%, 70.8%, and 90.9%, respectively. Seven local recurrences (29.2%) occurred in the local RT group with advanced stage, while seven patients (63.6%) in the TSEBT group experienced local failure. All recurrences were observed in lesions and patients with MF. Acute toxicities were mainly grade 1 or 2, with no grade 3 or higher events. No significant association between RT dose and local progression rates in MF lesions was found. Conclusion Skin-directed RT in CTCL is effective for local control and well-tolerated with less toxicity.

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicities of skin-directed radiotherapy (RT) in primary cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL). Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 57 CTCL lesions treated with skin-directed RT between January 2000 and December 2022. Lesions were categorized into three distinct groups: early-stage disease treated with local RT, advanced-stage disease treated with local RT, and advanced-stage disease treated with total skin electron beam therapy (TSEBT). Treatment outcomes, including response rates, recurrence patterns, and local progression probability, were assessed for each group. Results: Mycosis fungoides (MF) constituted 90.9% of the advanced-stage pathologies, while CD4+ primary cutaneous small/medium T-cell lymphoproliferative disorder was common in the early stage lesions (55%). Median RT doses were 30.6 Gy, 27 Gy, and 32 Gy for the local RT with early stage, the local RT with advanced stage, and TSEBT with advanced stage, respectively. The complete response rates were high across the groups: 95.5%, 70.8%, and 90.9%, respectively. Seven local recurrences (29.2%) occurred in the local RT group with advanced stage, while seven patients (63.6%) in the TSEBT group experienced local failure. All recurrences were observed in lesions and patients with MF. Acute toxicities were mainly grade 1 or 2, with no grade 3 or higher events. No significant association between RT dose and local progression rates in MF lesions was found. Conclusion Skin-directed RT in CTCL is effective for local control and well-tolerated with less toxicity.

Purpose: This study aimed to assess the real-world clinical outcomes of consolidative durvalumab in patients with unresectable locally advanced non–small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) and to explore the role of radiotherapy in the era of immunotherapy. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study assessed 171 patients with unresectable LA-NSCLC who underwent concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with or without consolidative durvalumab at Asan Medical Center between May 2018 and May 2021. Primary outcomes included freedom from locoregional failure (FFLRF), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: Durvalumab following CCRT demonstrated a prolonged median PFS of 20.9 months (p=0.048) and a 3-year FFLRF rate of 57.3% (p=0.008), compared to 13.7 months and 38.8%, respectively, with CCRT alone. Furthermore, the incidence of in-field recurrence was significantly greater in the CCRT-alone group compared to the durvalumab group (26.8% vs. 12.4%, p=0.027). While median OS was not reached with durvalumab, it was 35.4 months in patients receiving CCRT alone (p=0.010). Patients positive for programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression showed notably better outcomes, including FFLRF, DMFS, PFS, and OS. Adherence to PACIFIC trial eligibility criteria identified 100 patients (58.5%) as ineligible. The use of durvalumab demonstrated better survival regardless of eligibility criteria. Conclusion The use of durvalumab consolidation following CCRT significantly enhanced locoregional control and OS in patients with unresectable LA-NSCLC, especially in those with PD-L1–positive tumors, thereby validating the role of durvalumab in standard care.

Purpose: The detection rate of early-stage lung cancer with ground-glass opacity (GGO) has increased, and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has been suggested as an alternative to surgery in inoperable patients. However, reports on treatment results are limited. Therefore, we performed a retrospective study to investigate the clinical outcome after SBRT in patients with early-stage lung cancer with GGO-predominant tumor lesions at a single institution. Materials and Methods: This study included 89 patients with 99 lesions who were treated with SBRT for lung cancer with GGO-predominant lesions that had a consolidation-to-tumor ratio of ≤0.5 at Asan Medical Center between July 2016 and July 2021. A median total dose of 56.0 Gy (range, 48.0–60.0) was delivered using 10.0–15.0 Gy per fraction. Results: The overall follow-up period for the study was median 33.0 months (range, 9.9 to 65.9 months). There was 100% local control with no recurrences in any of the 99 treated lesions. Three patients had regional recurrences outside of the radiation field, and three had distant metastasis. The 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year overall survival rates were 100.0%, 91.6%, and 82.8%, respectively. Univariate analysis revealed that advanced age and a low level of diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide were significantly associated with overall survival. There were no patients with grade ≥3 toxicity. Conclusion SBRT is a safe and effective treatment for patients with GGO-predominant lung cancer lesions and is likely to be considered as an alternative to surgery.

Purpose: An optimal once-daily radiotherapy (RT) regimen is under investigation for definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in limited disease small cell lung cancer (LD-SCLC). We compared the efficacy and safety of dose escalation with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Materials and Methods: Between January 2016 and March 2021, patients treated with definitive CCRT for LD-SCLC with IMRT were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who received a total dose <50 Gy or those with a history of thoracic RT or surgery were excluded. The patients were divided into two groups (standard and dose-escalated) based on the total biologically effective dose (BED, α/β = 10) of 70 Gy. The chemotherapeutic regimen comprised four cycles of etoposide and cisplatin. Results: One hundred and twenty-two patients were analyzed and the median follow-up was 27.8 months (range, 4.4 to 76.9 months). The median age of the patients was 63 years (range, 35 to 78 years) and the majority had a history of smoking (86.0%). The 1- and 3-year overall survival rates of the escalated dose group were significantly higher than those of the standard group (93.5% and 50.5% vs. 76.7% and 33.3%, respectively; p = 0.008), as were the 1- and 3-year freedom from in-field failure rates (91.4% and 66.5% vs. 73.8% and 46.9%, respectively; p = 0.018). The incidence of grade 2 or higher acute and late pneumonitis was not significantly different between the two groups (p = 0.062, 0.185). Conclusion Dose-escalated once-daily CCRT with IMRT led to improved locoregional control and survival, with no increase in toxicity.

Purpose: Surface-guided radiation therapy is an image-guided method using optical surface imaging that has recently been adopted for patient setup and motion monitoring during treatment. We aimed to determine whether the surface guide setup is accurate and efficient compared to the skin-marking guide in prostate cancer treatment. Materials and Methods: The skin-marking setup was performed, and vertical, longitudinal, and lateral couch values (labeled as "M") were recorded. Subsequently, the surface-guided setup was conducted, and couch values (labeled as "S") were recorded. After performing cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), the final couch values was recorded (labeled as "C"), and the shift value was calculated (labeled as "Gap (M-S)," "Gap (M-C)," "Gap (S-C)") and then compared. Additionally, the setup times for the skin marking and surface guides were also compared. Results: One hundred and twenty-five patients were analyzed, totaling 2,735 treatment fractions. Gap (M-S) showed minimal differences in the vertical, longitudinal, and lateral averages (-0.03 cm, 0.07 cm, and 0.06 cm, respectively). Gap (M-C) and Gap (S-C) exhibited a mean difference of 0.04 cm (p = 0.03) in the vertical direction, a mean difference of 0.35 cm (p = 0.52) in the longitudinal direction, and a mean difference of 0.11 cm (p = 0.91) in the lateral direction. There was no correlation between shift values and patient characteristics. The average setup time of the skin-marking guide was 6.72 minutes, and 7.53 minutes for the surface guide. Conclusion There was no statistically significant difference between the surface and skin-marking guides regarding final CBCT shift values and no correlation between translational shift values and patient characteristics. We also observed minimal difference in setup time between the two methods. Therefore, the surface guide can be considered an accurate and time-efficient alternative to skin-marking guides.