1.Neonatal anesthesia: how we manage our most vulnerable patients.
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology 2015;68(5):434-441
Neonates undergoing surgery are at higher risk than older children for anesthesia-related adverse events. During the perioperative period, the maintenance of optimal hemodynamics in these patients is challenging and requires a thorough understanding of neonatal physiology and pharmacology. Data from animals and human cohort studies have shown relation of the currently used anesthetics may associate with neurotoxic brain injury that lead to later neurodevelopmental impairment in the developing brain. In this review, the unique neonatal physiologic and pharmacologic features and anesthesia-related neurotoxicity will be discussed.
Anesthesia*
;
Anesthetics
;
Animals
;
Brain
;
Brain Injuries
;
Child
;
Cohort Studies
;
Hemodynamics
;
Humans
;
Infant, Newborn
;
Neurotoxicity Syndromes
;
Parental Consent
;
Perioperative Period
;
Pharmacology
;
Physiology
2.Mental Change with Seizure after Propofol-N2O Anesthesia for Thoracoscopic Sympathectomy: A case report.
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology 2004;46(5):632-635
We experienced a case of postoperative mental change with seizure after propofol-N2O anesthesia for thoracoscopic sympathectomy. A 23-year-old male patient was anesthetized with N2O-O2-propofol, and postoperative pain control was achieved with intravenous morphine. Bilateral electrocauterization of the upper dorsal sympathetic chain at the T2 and T3 level was performed with thoracoscopy. Thoracoscopy was done with carbon dioxide insufflation. In the postoperative recovery room, the patient experienced seizure, fever and a mental change. He was transferred to the intensive care unit and treated with acyclovir, mannitol, diphenylhydantoin and dexamethasone. Fourteen days after the operation, the patient was discharged with a clear mentality.
Acyclovir
;
Anesthesia*
;
Carbon Dioxide
;
Dexamethasone
;
Fever
;
Humans
;
Insufflation
;
Intensive Care Units
;
Male
;
Mannitol
;
Morphine
;
Pain, Postoperative
;
Phenytoin
;
Propofol
;
Recovery Room
;
Seizures*
;
Seizures, Febrile
;
Sympathectomy*
;
Thoracoscopy
;
Young Adult
3.Comparison of analgesic effects of programmed intermittent epidural bolus and continuous epidural infusion after total knee arthroplasty.
Shinkyu KANG ; Sangyoon JEON ; Ji Hyun CHOE ; Si Ra BANG ; Ki Hwa LEE
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology 2013;65(6 Suppl):S130-S131
No abstract available.
Arthroplasty*
;
Knee*
4.Comparison of analgesic effects of programmed intermittent epidural bolus and continuous epidural infusion after total knee arthroplasty.
Shinkyu KANG ; Sangyoon JEON ; Ji Hyun CHOE ; Si Ra BANG ; Ki Hwa LEE
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology 2013;65(6 Suppl):S130-S131
No abstract available.
Arthroplasty*
;
Knee*
5.Risk factors of hypotension during cesarean section with spinal anesthesia in parturients with COVID-19: a retrospective study in comparison with pregnant women without COVID-19
Si Ra BANG ; Gunn Hee KIM ; Sung Jun CHO ; Mi Jung YOON
Anesthesia and Pain Medicine 2024;19(4):326-332
The incidence of hypotension in parturients with coronavirus disease (COVID-19) undergoing regional anesthesia remains controversial. This study aimed to investigate the incidence of hypotension during spinal anesthesia in parturients infected with COVID-19, as well as to identify associated risk factors. Methods: This retrospective study compared COVID-19-positive parturients who underwent cesarean section under spinal anesthesia (COVID-19 group) with a control group between January 2017 and June 2022. We reviewed the medical records and collected the following information: basic patient characteristics, spinal anesthesia, and newborn-related data. Results: Compared with the control group, the COVID-19 group did not show any significant differences in terms of hypotension occurrence and vasopressor usage. A positive correlation was noted in the COVID-19 group between heart rate and duration of hospital stay (P < 0.001, Spearman’s rho = 0.422). In subgroup analysis of the COVID-19 group, group with a baseline heart rate ≥ 100 (group H) had lower Apgar scores at 1 min, longer hospital stays, and more severe COVID-19 symptoms than the with a baseline heart rate < 100 (group L). Moreover, in group H, there was a positive correlation between the heart rate and the lowest systolic blood pressure after spinal anesthesia (P = 0.012, Spearman’s rho = 0.528). Conclusions: Parturients with COVID-19 do not appear to have a higher risk of hypotension during cesarean section under spinal anesthesia than those without COVID-19. Given the close association between preoperative heart rate and extent of hypotension in parturients with COVID-19 undergoing spinal anesthesia, vigilant monitoring of vital signs by anesthesiologists is crucial during the perioperative period.
6.Risk factors of hypotension during cesarean section with spinal anesthesia in parturients with COVID-19: a retrospective study in comparison with pregnant women without COVID-19
Si Ra BANG ; Gunn Hee KIM ; Sung Jun CHO ; Mi Jung YOON
Anesthesia and Pain Medicine 2024;19(4):326-332
The incidence of hypotension in parturients with coronavirus disease (COVID-19) undergoing regional anesthesia remains controversial. This study aimed to investigate the incidence of hypotension during spinal anesthesia in parturients infected with COVID-19, as well as to identify associated risk factors. Methods: This retrospective study compared COVID-19-positive parturients who underwent cesarean section under spinal anesthesia (COVID-19 group) with a control group between January 2017 and June 2022. We reviewed the medical records and collected the following information: basic patient characteristics, spinal anesthesia, and newborn-related data. Results: Compared with the control group, the COVID-19 group did not show any significant differences in terms of hypotension occurrence and vasopressor usage. A positive correlation was noted in the COVID-19 group between heart rate and duration of hospital stay (P < 0.001, Spearman’s rho = 0.422). In subgroup analysis of the COVID-19 group, group with a baseline heart rate ≥ 100 (group H) had lower Apgar scores at 1 min, longer hospital stays, and more severe COVID-19 symptoms than the with a baseline heart rate < 100 (group L). Moreover, in group H, there was a positive correlation between the heart rate and the lowest systolic blood pressure after spinal anesthesia (P = 0.012, Spearman’s rho = 0.528). Conclusions: Parturients with COVID-19 do not appear to have a higher risk of hypotension during cesarean section under spinal anesthesia than those without COVID-19. Given the close association between preoperative heart rate and extent of hypotension in parturients with COVID-19 undergoing spinal anesthesia, vigilant monitoring of vital signs by anesthesiologists is crucial during the perioperative period.
7.Risk factors of hypotension during cesarean section with spinal anesthesia in parturients with COVID-19: a retrospective study in comparison with pregnant women without COVID-19
Si Ra BANG ; Gunn Hee KIM ; Sung Jun CHO ; Mi Jung YOON
Anesthesia and Pain Medicine 2024;19(4):326-332
The incidence of hypotension in parturients with coronavirus disease (COVID-19) undergoing regional anesthesia remains controversial. This study aimed to investigate the incidence of hypotension during spinal anesthesia in parturients infected with COVID-19, as well as to identify associated risk factors. Methods: This retrospective study compared COVID-19-positive parturients who underwent cesarean section under spinal anesthesia (COVID-19 group) with a control group between January 2017 and June 2022. We reviewed the medical records and collected the following information: basic patient characteristics, spinal anesthesia, and newborn-related data. Results: Compared with the control group, the COVID-19 group did not show any significant differences in terms of hypotension occurrence and vasopressor usage. A positive correlation was noted in the COVID-19 group between heart rate and duration of hospital stay (P < 0.001, Spearman’s rho = 0.422). In subgroup analysis of the COVID-19 group, group with a baseline heart rate ≥ 100 (group H) had lower Apgar scores at 1 min, longer hospital stays, and more severe COVID-19 symptoms than the with a baseline heart rate < 100 (group L). Moreover, in group H, there was a positive correlation between the heart rate and the lowest systolic blood pressure after spinal anesthesia (P = 0.012, Spearman’s rho = 0.528). Conclusions: Parturients with COVID-19 do not appear to have a higher risk of hypotension during cesarean section under spinal anesthesia than those without COVID-19. Given the close association between preoperative heart rate and extent of hypotension in parturients with COVID-19 undergoing spinal anesthesia, vigilant monitoring of vital signs by anesthesiologists is crucial during the perioperative period.
8.Risk factors of hypotension during cesarean section with spinal anesthesia in parturients with COVID-19: a retrospective study in comparison with pregnant women without COVID-19
Si Ra BANG ; Gunn Hee KIM ; Sung Jun CHO ; Mi Jung YOON
Anesthesia and Pain Medicine 2024;19(4):326-332
The incidence of hypotension in parturients with coronavirus disease (COVID-19) undergoing regional anesthesia remains controversial. This study aimed to investigate the incidence of hypotension during spinal anesthesia in parturients infected with COVID-19, as well as to identify associated risk factors. Methods: This retrospective study compared COVID-19-positive parturients who underwent cesarean section under spinal anesthesia (COVID-19 group) with a control group between January 2017 and June 2022. We reviewed the medical records and collected the following information: basic patient characteristics, spinal anesthesia, and newborn-related data. Results: Compared with the control group, the COVID-19 group did not show any significant differences in terms of hypotension occurrence and vasopressor usage. A positive correlation was noted in the COVID-19 group between heart rate and duration of hospital stay (P < 0.001, Spearman’s rho = 0.422). In subgroup analysis of the COVID-19 group, group with a baseline heart rate ≥ 100 (group H) had lower Apgar scores at 1 min, longer hospital stays, and more severe COVID-19 symptoms than the with a baseline heart rate < 100 (group L). Moreover, in group H, there was a positive correlation between the heart rate and the lowest systolic blood pressure after spinal anesthesia (P = 0.012, Spearman’s rho = 0.528). Conclusions: Parturients with COVID-19 do not appear to have a higher risk of hypotension during cesarean section under spinal anesthesia than those without COVID-19. Given the close association between preoperative heart rate and extent of hypotension in parturients with COVID-19 undergoing spinal anesthesia, vigilant monitoring of vital signs by anesthesiologists is crucial during the perioperative period.
9.Risk factors of hypotension during cesarean section with spinal anesthesia in parturients with COVID-19: a retrospective study in comparison with pregnant women without COVID-19
Si Ra BANG ; Gunn Hee KIM ; Sung Jun CHO ; Mi Jung YOON
Anesthesia and Pain Medicine 2024;19(4):326-332
The incidence of hypotension in parturients with coronavirus disease (COVID-19) undergoing regional anesthesia remains controversial. This study aimed to investigate the incidence of hypotension during spinal anesthesia in parturients infected with COVID-19, as well as to identify associated risk factors. Methods: This retrospective study compared COVID-19-positive parturients who underwent cesarean section under spinal anesthesia (COVID-19 group) with a control group between January 2017 and June 2022. We reviewed the medical records and collected the following information: basic patient characteristics, spinal anesthesia, and newborn-related data. Results: Compared with the control group, the COVID-19 group did not show any significant differences in terms of hypotension occurrence and vasopressor usage. A positive correlation was noted in the COVID-19 group between heart rate and duration of hospital stay (P < 0.001, Spearman’s rho = 0.422). In subgroup analysis of the COVID-19 group, group with a baseline heart rate ≥ 100 (group H) had lower Apgar scores at 1 min, longer hospital stays, and more severe COVID-19 symptoms than the with a baseline heart rate < 100 (group L). Moreover, in group H, there was a positive correlation between the heart rate and the lowest systolic blood pressure after spinal anesthesia (P = 0.012, Spearman’s rho = 0.528). Conclusions: Parturients with COVID-19 do not appear to have a higher risk of hypotension during cesarean section under spinal anesthesia than those without COVID-19. Given the close association between preoperative heart rate and extent of hypotension in parturients with COVID-19 undergoing spinal anesthesia, vigilant monitoring of vital signs by anesthesiologists is crucial during the perioperative period.
10.General anesthesia versus sedation with dexmedetomidine for thoracic endovascular aortic repair in 38 patients in multicenter experiences: A retrospective study.
Hey Ran CHOI ; Dae Won LEE ; Kyung Woo KIM ; Si Ra BANG ; Sun Kyung MIN ; Min Kyung OH ; Ji Yeon KIM ; Young Jin RO ; Yoon Ji CHOI
Anesthesia and Pain Medicine 2014;9(3):193-200
BACKGROUND: Endovascular stent graft placement is a useful treatment option in lesions of the thoracic aorta. The aim of this study was to assess the possibility of sedation with dexmedetomidine compared with general anesthesia in patients undergoing thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in a multi-center clinical trial. METHODS: Data from 38 patients with thoracic aorta lesions treated by TEVAR between April 2010 and November 2013 were retrospectively collected at two hospitals. General anesthesia or sedation with dexmedetomidine was determined according to the hospital. Demographics, anesthetic recordings, and complications were reviewed. RESULTS: Stent graft placement was technically successful in all patients. There were no events during the anesthetic period. A total of 38 patients underwent TEVAR; 29 patients received general anesthesia, and 9 received sedation. Dexmedetomidine sedation (loading dose: 0.5-1.0 microg/kg for 10 min, maintenance: 0.2-0.8 microg/kg/h) was successfully performed without anesthesia-related complications or mortality. During the procedure, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, and saturation of peripheral oxygen were not statistically different between general anesthesia and dexmedetomidine sedation. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, TEVAR under sedation with dexmedetomidine was shown to be a feasible procedure that was well tolerated without specific complications.
Anesthesia, General*
;
Aorta, Thoracic
;
Arterial Pressure
;
Blood Vessel Prosthesis
;
Demography
;
Dexmedetomidine*
;
Heart Rate
;
Humans
;
Mortality
;
Oxygen
;
Retrospective Studies*