1.Analysis of pathogens distribution and drug resistance from blood culture in a grade 3 A hospital
Xiaoyan LOU ; Weifeng JIN ; Lili ZHU ; Shuzi CHEN ; Qinglan YANG ; Ping LI ; Ping LIN
International Journal of Laboratory Medicine 2016;37(23):3263-3265,3268
Objective To analyze the distribution and drug resistance of pathogens isolated from blood culture specimens in a grade 3A hospital so as to provide a basis for the prevention and control of bloodstream infection ,and rational antibacterial drugs use .Methods A total of 3 241 blood culture results in our center from June 2014 to September 2016 were analyzed retrospectively . The blood samples were cultivated with the BacT/ALERT 3D and VersaTrek instruments .The bacterial identification and antibiotic susceptibility tests were conducted with VITEK‐2 Compact and ARIS 2X instruments .Results Among 3 241 blood culture speci‐mens ,99 strains of pathogenic bateria were isolated with the positive rate of 3 .1% ,including 42(42 .4% ) strains of Gram‐negative bacteria ,54(54 .5% ) strains of Gram‐positive bacteria and 3(3 .0% ) strains of fungus .The top three of Gram‐negative bacteria were in turn Eescherichia coli ,Klebsiella pneumonia and Pseudomonas aeruginosa ;the top three of Gram‐positive bacteria were in turn coagulase‐negative staphylococcus (CNS ) ,Staphylococcus aureus and streptococcus pyogenes .Enterobacteriaceae remained 100 .0% sensitivity to imipenem ,meropenem ,piperacillin/tazobactam and amikacin .The resistance rate of Gram‐positive bacterium to vancomycin ,linezolid ,teicoplanin and gentamycin was 0 .0% ,the rest had different degrees of drug resistance .Conclusion Ee‐scherichia coli ,CNS and Staphylococcus aureus are the most frequent pathogenic bacteria of the blood stream infection in our hospi‐tal .Pathogens show different resistance to different kinds of antibacterial agents .Clinic should rationally select the antibacterial a‐gents according to the drug susceptibility test results so as to slow down the generation of drug resistance bacterial strains .
2.Current status and prospect of biomarker research for schizophrenia
Mengyuan ZHU ; Qing CHEN ; Dan LI ; Mengxia WANG ; Renyu WANG ; Yuxin ZHU ; Weifeng JIN ; Shuzi CHEN ; Ping LI ; Zhenhua LI ; Peijun MA ; Shuai LIU ; Qiong GAO ; Xiaoyan LOU ; Jie XU ; Lili ZHU ; Ling ZHAO ; Kangyi LIANG ; Jinghong CHEN ; Xunjia CHENG ; Ke DONG ; Xiaokui GUO ; Qingtian LI ; Yun SHI ; Junyu SUN ; Huabin XU ; Ping LIN
Chinese Journal of Laboratory Medicine 2022;45(11):1191-1196
Schizophrenia is a serious mental disease. The diagnosis of schizophrenia so far relies heavily on subjective evidence, including self-reported experiences by patients, manifestations described by relatives, and abnormal behaviors assessed by psychiatrists. The diagnosis, monitoring of the disease progression and therapy efficacy assessment are challenging due to the lack of established laboratory biomarkers. Based on the current literature, clinical consensus, guidelines, and expert recommendations, this review highlighted evidence-based potential laboratory biomarkers for the diagnosis of schizophrenia, including genetic biomarkers, neurotransmitters, neurodevelopmental-related proteins, and intestinal flora, and discussed the potential future directions for the application of these biomarkers in this field, aiming to provide an objective basis for the use of these biomarkers in the early and accurate diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis and rehabilitation assessment of schizophrenia.