1.Clinical Observation of Salvianolate in the Treatment of Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmo-nary Disease
Shutie LI ; Yeming WANG ; Yuanli LI ; Chen CHEN ; Lei WANG ; Wei JIANG ; Fulong LI
China Pharmacy 2016;27(17):2402-2404
OBJECTIVE:To observe clinical efficacy and safety of salvianolate in the treatment of acute exacerbation of chron-ic obstructive pulmonary disease(AECOPD). METHODS:80 AECOPD patients were selected and randomly divided into observa-tion group and control group,with 40 cases in each group. Both groups received mechanical ventilation. Control group was given routine treatment of theophyllinum,bronchodilators and glucocorticoid;treatment group was additionally given Salvianolate injec-tion 200 mg,qd,ivgtt,on the basis of control group. Clinical efficacy was observed in 2 groups,blood hemorheology indexes were also observed before and after treatment. The mechanical ventilation time,ICU residence time and ADR were recorded in 2 groups. RESULTS:Clinical total effective rate of observation group was 95.00%,which was significantly higher than 70.00% of control group,with statistical significance(P<0.05). Before treatment and 2 d after treatment,blood rheology indexes of treatment group were improved significantly(all P>0.05),and whole blood reduction viscosity of control group was improved significantly(P<0.05). Mechanical ventilation time and ICU residence time of treatment group was significantly shorter than that of control group (P<0.05). No ADR was found in 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS:Salvianolate can significantly improve the blood coagulation status of AECOPD patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation,and has the advantages of good clinical efficacy and low cost of medical treatment.
2.Application of bedside ultrasound in the evaluation of volume responsiveness in patients with septic shock
Zhifei QIAO ; Liqian ZHANG ; Chunyan LIU ; Huijuan WANG ; Qinqin MA ; Shutie LI ; Lei WANG ; Liping ZHAI ; Fulong LI
Journal of Chinese Physician 2023;25(2):220-225
Objective:To evaluate the value of bedside ultrasound in evaluating volume responsiveness of patients with septic shock.Methods:A total of 102 patients with septic shock admitted to ICU of the First Affiliated Hospital of Hebei North University from April 2018 to February 2021 were selected. Patients were divided into response group and non-response group according to the value of stroke volume increase (ΔSV) after volume loading test (VE), and the hemodynamic parameters before and after VE were compared between the two groups. Pearson correlation was used to analyze the relationship between ΔSV and hemodynamic indexes. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was drawn to analyze the sensitivity and specificity of each hemodynamic index in evaluating volumetric reactivity in patients with septic shock.Results:Of the 102 patients, 54 responded and 48 did not. Before VE, the distensibility index of inferior vena cava (ΔIVC 1), espiratory variability index of inferior vena cava (ΔIVC 2), respiratory variability of aortic peak velocity (ΔVpeak AO), brachial artery maximum velocity variability (ΔVpeak BA) and respiratory rate of peak flow velocity of femoral artery (ΔVpeak CFA) in response group were higher than those in non-response group (all P<0.05), but there was no statistical significance in heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP) and central venous pressure (CVP) between 2 groups (all P>0.05). After VE, the HR, ΔIVC 1, ΔIVC 2, ΔVpeak AO, ΔVpeak BA and ΔVpeak CFA in response group were significantly decreased, while MAP and CVP were significantly increased (all P<0.05). The CVP was significantly decreased in the non-response group ( P<0.05), while other indexes were not significantly changed. Before VE, the ΔIVC 1, ΔIVC 2, ΔVpeak AO, ΔVpeak BA and ΔVpeak CFA were positively correlated with ΔSV ( r=0.589, 0.647, 0.697, 0.621, 0.766; all P<0.05). There was no correlation between CVP and ΔSV ( r=-0.345, P>0.05). Before VE, the area under the curve of ΔIVC 1, ΔIVC 2, ΔVpeak AO, ΔVpeak BA and ΔVpeak CFA were all >0.7, indicating high sensitivity and specificity. Conclusions:Bedside ultrasound monitoring ΔIVC, ΔVpeak AO, ΔVpeak BA and ΔVpeak CFA can better evaluate the volume response of patients with septic shock, and can provide a reference basis for clinical fluid resuscitation treatment.