Objective:To explore the clinical application value of 3D printing technology in percutaneous nephrolithotomy(PCNL) to complex renal calculi.Methods:The clinical data of 41 patients with complex renal calculi from May 2018 to October 2019, in the First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University and Xiang'an District of the First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University were retrospectively analyzed. There were 19 cases underwent PCNL after 3D printing (3D printing group), and 22 cases during the same period did not undergo 3D printing before operation (control group). Before operation, the two groups underwent CT plain scan enhanced examination. In 3D printing group, 3D printing technology was used to obtain 3D renal models, then 3D renal models were used for preoperative design and simulation of surgical puncture and preoperative conversation.The control group only underwent PCNL after routine examination.The ages of the patients in 3D printing group and control group were (42.9±2.5) vs. (41.3±2.9) years old, male/female ratio 11/8 vs. 12/10, body mass index (22.4±1.1) vs. (23.2±1.4) kg/m 2, serum creatinine (42.9±2.5) vs. (78.2±4.5) μmol/L, stone size (5.0±1.2) vs. (5.2±1.3) cm, the CT values of the stones was (930±210) vs.(950±200) HU. The difference of above parameters was not statistically significant ( P>0.05). The following indexes were compared between the two groups: score of questionnaire on satisfaction of preoperative conversation, and datas about operation and postopetation. Results:All the operations were successfully completed. The time of locating the target calyces in 3D printing group and control group was (3.3±1.3) vs. (5.3±3.1) min, and the coincidence of puncture calices was 94.7% (18/19) vs. 54.5%(12/22), and the stone removal rate of the 3D printing group was 78.9% (17/19) vs. 36.4% (8/22), 3D printing group was better than the control group in these respects( P < 0.05). However, there were no significant differences in postoperative complications [21.0% (4/19) vs. 13.6% (3/22)], multi-channel[89.4% (17/19) vs. 86.4% (19/22)], operation time [(121.8±20.2) vs. (132.1±18.5) min], time of hospitalization [(7.6±1.3) vs. (8.0±1.8)d] and time of extubation for renal fistula [(3.8±1.7)vs. (4.5±2.0 )d] (all P > 0.05). During preoperative conversation between the 3D printing group and the control group , the time spent on signing the consent [(17.0±3.9) vs.(21.0±3.3) min], the degree of understanding of the stone condition [(2.5±0.6)vs.(2.0±1.2) points], the degree of understanding of the PCNL surgical process and complications [(2.6±0.6) vs.(1.8±1.3) points] and the degree of satisfaction with the doctor’s preoperative conversation effects [(2.4±0.9) vs.(1.7±1.6) points]were significantly different in comparisons ( P<0.05). Conclusions:3D printing technology can be used in PCNL to directly display the internal anatomical relationship of renal calculi, guide accurate preoperative designing, help improve the operation efficiency and stone clearance rate, and can also be used as a mold in preoperative conversation to improve communication efficiency.

Objective: Explore the function and regulatory mechanism of Annexin A1 (ANXA1) in bladder cancer cell proliferation, apoptosis and migration. Methods: From February 2018 to June 2019, we use T24 cells as the model and divide it into over-expression control group (ctrl), ANXA1 over-expression group (ANXA1), knockdown control group (shctrl), ANXA1 knockdown group 1 (shANXA1-1), ANXA1 knockdown group 2 (shANXA1-2) and ANXA1 knockdown group 3 (shANXA1-3). 24 hours after the culture, the cells were collected and the mRNA expression level of ANXA1 was detected by Real-Time quantitative PCR. The cell activity was detected by CCK-8; the cell apoptosis and cycle were detected by flow cytometry. The cell migration was detected by Transwell assay. Results: The Real-Time quantitative PCR showed that the expression of ANXA1 in the over expression group was significantly higher than that in the over expression control group (15 369.00±874.20 and 1.00±0.07, P<0.001). The expression of ANXA1 in the knockdown group 2 and 3 were significantly lower than that in the knockdown control group (0.51±0.04, 0.51±0.02 and 1.00±0.04, P<0.001). Compared with the over expression control group(1.61±0.01), the cell activity of the over expression group(2.04±0.02)was significantly increased (P<0.001), while the activity of the knockdown group 2 and 3 (1.40±0.002 and 1.31±0.003)were significantly decreased than the knockdown ctrl group (1.73±0.01)(P<0.001). The results of flow cytometry showed that the number of G₀/G₁ cells in the over-expression group was significantly lower than that in the over-expression control group (28.14±0.33 and 46.19±0.73, P<0.001), while that in the knockdown group 2 and 3 were significantly higher than that in the knockdown control group (58.670±0.49, 62.34±4.01 and 45.59± 0.19, P<0.001 and P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the number of apoptosis between the over-expression group and the over-expression control group (P>0.05), while the number of apoptosis in the knockdown group 2 and 3 were significantly higher than that in the knockdown control group (13.04%, 14.58% and 7.76%, P<0.001). Cell function analysis showed that the number of cells passing through the membrane of the over expression group was significantly higher than that of the over expression group (525.00±9.30 and 385.70±13.40, P<0.01), while that of the knockdown group 2 and 3 were significantly lower than that of the knockdown control group (214.70±6.40, 226.00±5.30 and 398.70±10.00, P<0.001). Conclusions Over-expression of ANXA1 significantly promoted the proliferation, cycle and migration of T24 cells and inhibited apoptosis. On the contrary, ANXA1 knockdown inhibited the proliferation, cycle and migration of T24 cells and promoted apoptosis.