This paper presents a design of non-blood contacting pneumatic ventricle assistance device, which consisted of several parts, such as dual-cavity cardiac assistance cup, ventricle assistance controller, computer, vacuum pump, and air compressor. And the performance of the non-blood contacting pneumatic ventricle assistance device on mock circulation loop is introduced, which is very close to the normal cardiac output.
Equipment Design ; Heart Ventricles ; Heart-Assist Devices

In order to complete the information statistics and submission work of designated hospitals with high quality, a hospital uses the agile business intelligence system to carry out information construction, and realize the statistics, analysis and auxiliary management decision-making of COVID-19 patients′ admission data. Based on the low-load and full-volume data capture mechanism, relevant basic data in the background of the hospital information system was extracted, and the admission information visualization and early warning analysis system was built by establishing data relations, data modeling and other methods. The hospital completed 634 batches of data statistics and reporting tasks of 2 943 patients in a timely and efficient manner, and assisted clinical diagnosis and treatment improvement and hospital leadership decision-making by using data analysis, early warning feedback and other functions.

Objective:To explore the clinical efficacy of hip arthroscopy (HA) and periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) in the treatment of borderline developmental dysplasia of the hip (BDDH).Methods:The clinical data of 57 patients with BDDH treated with HA or PAO from July 2016 to June 2020 were retrospectively studied. According to surgical methods, they were divided into HA group and PAO group. There were 32 patients (6 males and 26 females) in HA group, with an average age of 34.5±6.4 years, ranging from 19 to 47 years. There were 25 patients (5 males and 20 females) in the PAO group, with an average age of 37.2±6.9 years, ranging from 21 to 50 years. Patients were followed up till May 2023. Imaging data of patients before the surgery and during follow-up were collected including lateral center edge angle (LCEA), anterior center edge angle (ACEA), extrusion index, T?nnis angle, femoral neck anteversion angle, and T?nnis grade. The modified Harris hip score (mHSS), non-arthritic hip score (NAHS) and hip outcome score activity of daily living scale (HOS-ADL) were evaluated at 6 months, 12 months and the final follow-up.Results:All patients were followed up for an average of 54.2±8.2 months in HA group and 55.5±9.4 months in PAO group separately. Before surgery, there were no significant differences in LCEA, ACEA, T?nnis angle, extrusion index, femoral neck anteversion angle and T?nnis grade between the two groups ( P>0.05). α angle of HA was 60.8°±5.8°, which was significant different from α angle of PAO 53.0°±5.9° ( t=5.07, P<0.001). At the final follow-up, in HA group, LCEA, ACEA, T?nnis angle, extrusion index were 20.0°±2.1°, 20.0°±2.6°, 30.6%±2.3%, 10.8°±1.6°, 39.8°±5.4, which were all significantly different from pre-operation data ( P<0.05). While there was no significant difference between pre- and post-operation in T?nnis grade (χ 2=5.72, P=0.057). In PAO group, LCEA, ACEA, T?nnis angle, extrusion index were 33.0°±3.0°, 33.3°±4.0°, 15.0%±4.0%, 2.8°±1.7° which were all significantly different from pre-operation data ( P<0.05). While there were no significant differences between pre- and post-operation in α angle and Tonnis grade ( P>0.05). Between HA group and PAO group, there were significant differences in LCEA, ACEA, T?nnis angle, extrusion index and α angle ( P<0.05), while no significant difference was found in T?nnis grade (χ 2=3.024, P=0.996). There were no significant differences between the two groups in preoperative mHHS, NAHS and HOS-ADL ( P>0.05). At 6 months,12 months and the final follow-up after operation, the mHHS, NAHS and HOS-ADL were significantly improved compared to pre-operation data ( P<0.05). At 6 months and 12 months after operation, the three hip function scores in HA group were significantly better than those in PAO group ( P<0.05). At the final follow-up, there was no significant difference in three hip scores between the HA group and the PAO group ( P>0.05). Conclusion:Both HA and PAO can achieve good short- and mid-term clinical efficacy in the treatment of BDDH. Specifically, HA is superior to PAO in the early clinical efficacy, and the mid-term clinical efficacy is similar. PAO is able to improve the acetabular radiographic parameters of BDDH (except α angle) while HA can only improve α angle. However, they all can effectively delay the imaging progression of hip osteoarthritis.