In recent years, the number of MitraClip procedures has increased among high-risk patients for open-heart surgery with mitral regurgitation. However, surgical re-intervention is sometimes required after a MitraClip procedure, and this re-intervention carries high risks considering the patients' backgrounds. We report on two cases of surgical re-intervention after MitraClip procedures. Case 1: An 82-year-old man experienced repeated heart failure due to severe mitral regurgitation (MR) caused by chronic atrial fibrillation. He underwent the MitraClip procedure because of his advanced age and frailty. However, his heart failure became uncontrollable due to an acute exacerbation of MR caused by Clip detachment. He underwent mitral valve replacement (MVR) 10 days after the MitraClip procedure. Case 2: A 72-year-old man experienced heart failure due to severe ischemic MR. The MitraClip procedure was performed because of hemorrhagic cerebral infarction and emphysema. However, two years after the MitraClip procedure, his condition was worsened due to MR and mitral stenosis. He eventually underwent MVR. If surgical re-intervention is required after a MitraClip procedure, open-heart surgery such as valve replacement is essential. When performing valve replacement surgery, it is considered important to preserve the subvalvular apparatus as much as possible to prevent complications.

In acute Stanford type A aortic dissection, except for some thrombosed false-lumen types, graft replacement is a standard treatment. On the other hand, thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) might be considered for high-risk patients with retrograde type A aortic dissection when entry is in the descending aorta, although its efficacy in a case of an extensive thrombosed false lumen without obvious entry is unknown. We report a case of successful zone 3 TEVAR using RelayPro NBS for Stanford type A aortic dissection with a localized CT-enhanced false lumen in the proximal descending aorta. An 83-year-old woman was admitted for acute Stanford type A aortic dissection with a thrombosed false lumen of the ascending thoracic aorta. She was initially treated conservatively because of being a high-risk patient for open surgery. One week after hospitalization, the ascending aorta diameter increased and the false lumen in the proximal descending aorta grew sporadically in a CT image. We suspected that the ascending aorta was enlarged due to a partially patent false lumen of the descending thoracic aorta, and performed zone 3 TEVAR using RelayPro NBS to close a possible entry in the proximal descending aorta even though there was no obvious entry. The patient had a good postoperative course and was discharged 15 days after TEVAR. Shrinkage of the false lumen in the ascending aorta was observed in CT images two months after TEVAR.