OBJECTIVETo evaluate results of 1310 knees of meniscal treatments by arthroscopy and to present good method of meniscal treatment.

METHODSTheir age, traumatic mechanism and effects under arthroscopy were analysed in a series of 254 patients with meniscal injuries, there were 880 males and 374 females, the average of the patients was 25.5 years. The meniscal repair in 68 knee, partial meniscectomy in 756 knee, total meniscectomy in 480 knee and conservative treatment in 6 cases.

RESULTSThe patients were followed up 1 to 12 years with the average of 4 years and 3 months. The mean Lysholm score was 86.3 points in arthroscopic meniscal repair, 84.0 points in partial meniscectomy and 76.1 points in total meniscectomy. The mean Lysholm 98.7 points in all children patients with conservative treatment. They showed significant difference (P < 0.01) in the results of three treatments.

CONCLUSIONSMeniscal injuries should not cut off as it, should be repaired in 5 mm from meniscus to synovium and or partial meniscectomy. The general adoption is not the surgical operation on meniscal injuries of the child.

Adolescent ; Adult ; Age Factors ; Arthroscopy ; Casts, Surgical ; Child ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Fracture Fixation ; methods ; Humans ; Knee Injuries ; surgery ; Male ; Menisci, Tibial ; surgery ; Middle Aged ; Tibial Meniscus Injuries ; Treatment Outcome

OBJECTIVETo discuss the reasons for the operation performed on 13 patients with upper cervical disease and to explore the management and prevention of upper cervical disease.

METHODSThirteen patients with upper cervical disease were retrospectively reviewed. The reason for of reoperations on these patients were analyzed. The measures to reduce upper cervical operational complication and bad prognosis were discussed to avoid reoperations.

RESULTSThe reasons for reoperations included 9 cases with unstable or re-dislocated atlantoaxial joint, 10 cases with residual spinal cord compression, 1 case with malposition of odontoid screw, 1 case with adjacent cervical spine regression, 1 case with occipital-cervical fusion failure, 1 case with spinal cord injury during operation, 1 case with bone-plant slipped into canales spinalis, and 1 case with demand to take out internal fixation for aggravated symptom.

CONCLUSIONSThe common reasons for upper cervical reoperations were due to instability or redislocation of atlantoaxial joint and residual of spinal cord compression. Some measures such as reducing operate miss, using firm internal fixation and decompressing were advisable to decrease the incidence of reoperations.

Adolescent ; Adult ; Atlanto-Axial Joint ; Cervical Vertebrae ; surgery ; Decompression, Surgical ; Female ; Humans ; Joint Instability ; etiology ; prevention & control ; surgery ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Postoperative Complications ; etiology ; prevention & control ; surgery ; Reoperation ; statistics & numerical data ; Spinal Cord Compression ; etiology ; prevention & control ; surgery ; Spinal Fusion ; Young Adult

OBJECTIVETo study the relevant position of C(2) pedicle to C(2) inferior articular process, set up a technique of C(2) pedicle screw placement with the inferior articular process of axis as an anatomic landmark.

METHODSFifty C(2) bone specimens were used to measure the distance from the sagittal midline to the medial border, the midpoint and the lateral border of C(2) inferior articular process or C(2) pedicle; the width and the height of the C(2) pedicle were also evaluated. The anatomic relation between the measurements data of C(2) pedicle and that of C(2) inferior articular process were analyzed, and the technique of C(2) pedicle screw fixation was established.

RESULTSThe medial border of C(2) inferior articular process was averaged (3.67 +/- 0.41) mm lateral to that of C(2) pedicle, and the midpoint C(2) inferior articular process was averaged (1.15 +/- 0.44) mm lateral to the lateral border of C(2) pedicle, respectively. Using the C(2) inferior articular process as landmark, two techniques was established for C(2) pedicle screw placement. The entry point of method A was located in 2 mm medial and superior to the central point of C(2) inferior articular process; the entry point of method B was at the crossing point of the medial border C(2) inferior articular process with the superior quarter of C(2) inferior articular process.

CONCLUSIONSThere is a steady anatomic relation between C(2) pedicle and C(2) inferior articular process, the C(2) inferior articular process could be as a convenient key anatomic landmark to determine the location of C(2) pedicle and the position of C(2) pedicle screw entry point.

Axis, Cervical Vertebra ; anatomy & histology ; surgery ; Humans ; Spinal Fusion ; methods

OBJECTIVETo study the relevant position of the pedicle of C1 to the lateral mass of C(2-4), set up an identification technique for the entry point decision of C1 pedicle screw by using the lateral mass of C(2-4) as anatomic landmarks.

METHODSTwenty cadaver specimens were used to measure the distance from the sagittal midline of spine to the medial border, the midpoint and the lateral border of C1 pedicle or the lateral mass of C2, C3 or C4. The anatomic relation between the measurements data of C1 pedicle and that of the lateral masses of the cervical vertebrae were analyzed, and the technique of C1 pedicle screw fixation was established.

RESULTSThe average medial border of the lateral mass of C2, C3 and C4 was 0.37 mm, 0.27 mm and 0.24 mm lateral to that of C1 pedicle, the average midpoint of the lateral mass of C2, C3 and C4 was 1.18 mm, 1.41 mm and 1.74 mm lateral to that of C1 pedicle, and the average lateral border of the lateral mass of C2, C3 and C4 was 1.96 mm, 2.54 mm and 3.24 mm lateral to that of C1 pedicle, respectively.

CONCLUSIONThere is a steady anatomic location relation between C1 pedicle and the lateral mass of C2, C3 or C4. As well as the lateral mass of C2, the lateral mass of C3 or that of C4 could be convenient anatomic landmarks to determine the location of C1 pedicle and the position of C1 pedicle screw entry point.

Adult ; Cadaver ; Cervical Atlas ; anatomy & histology ; surgery ; Cervical Vertebrae ; anatomy & histology ; surgery ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Spinal Fusion ; methods

ObjectiveTo compare the clinical efficiency of Shang Ring with that of the disposable circumcision suture device (DCSD) in the treatment of phimosis or redundant prepuce.

METHODSFrom June 2013 to March 2015, we treated 320 patients with phimosis or redundant prepuce using Shang Ring (n=158) or DCSD (n=162). We compared the operation time, intra-operative blood loss, incision healing time, postoperative complications, postoperative satisfaction, and treatment cost between the two groups of patients.

RESULTSComparison between the Shang Ring and DCSD groups showed that the operation time was (5.6±1.3) vs (5.4±1.2) min, intra-operative blood loss (1.2±0.8) vs (1.3±0.9) ml, postoperative delayed hemorrhage 3.16% (5/158) vs 4.32% (7/162), incision healing time (16.1±7.2) vs (7.5±2.3) d, wound infection 15.82% (25/158) vs 7.41% (12/162), 1-month postoperative incision edema 29.11% (46/158) vs 9.26% (15/162), overall postoperative satisfaction rate 63.92% (101/158) vs 90.12% (146/162), and treatment cost (1121.2±15.6) vs (2142.6±10.8) RMB ¥. There were statistically significant differences between the two groups in the latter five parameters (P<0.05 ), but not in the first three (P>0.05 ).

CONCLUSIONSThe DSCD has an obvious superiority over Shang Ring for its relatively lower complication rate, shorter incision healing time, and better cosmetic appearance.

Blood Loss, Surgical ; Circumcision, Male ; instrumentation ; Edema ; epidemiology ; Humans ; Male ; Operative Time ; Penis ; surgery ; Personal Satisfaction ; Phimosis ; surgery ; Postoperative Complications ; Postoperative Hemorrhage ; Postoperative Period ; Prostheses and Implants ; Surgical Wound ; pathology ; Sutures

Objective: To investigate the application of a simplified technique for reconstruction of vesicourethral support (RVUS) in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP). METHODS: From January 2017 to August 2019, 122 patients with localized prostate cancer underwent extraperitoneal LRP, 65 with RVUS (the RVUS group) and 57 without RVUS (the non-RVUS group). We compared the operation time, intraoperative blood loss, rate of pelvic lymph node dissection, neurovascular bundle sparing, incidence of urethrovesical anastomotic urinary leakage (UVAUL), postoperative urinary continence, postoperative hospital stay, intraperitoneal drainage tube removal time, and urethral catheter removal time between the two groups of patients. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups in the operation time, intraoperative blood loss, rate of pelvic lymph node dissection, neurovascular bundle sparing, or urethral catheter removal time (P > 0.05). The incidence rate of UVAUL was lower in the non-RVUS than in the RVUS group (8.8% vs 0%, P < 0.05), and so were the rates of postoperative urinary continence immediate after (0% vs 32.3%, P < 0.05) and at 1 month (38.6% vs 56.9%, P < 0.05), 3 months (59.6% vs 80%, P < 0.05), 6 months (78.9% vs 84.6%, P > 0.05) and 12 months after catheter removal (87.7% vs 92.3%, P > 0.05). The postoperative hospital stay was dramatically longer in the non-RVUS than in the RVUS group (［9.1 ± 4.3］ vs ［6.7 ± 1.8］ d, P < 0.01) and so was the intraperitoneal drainage tube removal time (［6.9 ± 4.5］ vs ［4.8 ± 1.5］ d, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS The simplified technique for reconstruction of vesicourethral support in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy improves early urinary continence, especially immediate continence, decreases the incidence rate of urethrovesical anastomotic urinary leakage, and shortens the intraperitoneal drainage tube removal time and postoperative hospital stay.?
Humans ; Laparoscopy ; Male ; Prostatectomy