Objective To investigate the relationship between stent thrombosis and obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS) in patients after coronary artery stent implantation (CASI). Methods One hundred and seventeen patients were rolled after CASI, of which 29 suffering from OSAHS were enrolled into the research group, 88 patients without OSAHS were enrolled into the control group. The incidence rate of stent thrombosis between the above two groups was analyzed. Results Three patients suffered stent thrombosis in the research group, with the incidence rate of 10.3%,which was significantly higher than that in the control group, with the incidence rate of 1.10%(P = 0.047). Conclusions After CASI, patients with OSAHS had higher risk of stent thrombosis compared with patients without OSAHS. OSHAS should be considered as a risk factor for stent thrombosis.

Objective To evaluate the significance of contrast medium (CM) volume and estimated glomerular filtration rate (CM/eGFR) in predicting contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) after PCI. Methods A total of 307 patients after PCI were enrolled from Nanfang Hospital from May 2014 to October 2015. The patients were divided into the CIN group(n = 29) and the non-CIN group(n = 278) according to whether CIN within 72 hours after PCI. The baseline renal function was assessed by the sCr and CyC, respectively. Results Twenty-nine patients (9.4%, 29/307) developed CIN. There were significant differences in Age, CM、NTpro-BNP、IABP、 Periprocedural Hypotension、Preprocedural sCr/CyC between two groups (P < 0.05, respectively). The result of multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that Age, Cardiac function ≥Ⅲ level, IABP, use CCB, CM/eGFRMDRD, CM/eGFRCyC were independent risk predictors for CIN, respectively. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed that the area under the curve of CM/eGFRMDRD(AUC = 0.838) was superior to CM/eGFRCyC (AUC = 0.805) without significant difference. The sensitivity and specificity were 79.3%and 76.3%(Cut-off Point = 2.094), respectively. Conclusion Both the CM/eGFRMDRD and CM/eGFRCyC may be good methods to determine maximum CM before PCI and to predict CIN after PCI currently, without significant differences between these two predictors.