1. Impact of KIT D816 mutation on salvage therapy in relapsed acute myeloid leukemia with t(8;21) translocation
Benfa GONG ; Yehui TAN ; Aijun LIAO ; Jian LI ; Yueying MAO ; Ning LU ; Yi DING ; Erlie JIANG ; Tiejun GONG ; Zhilin JIA ; Yu SUN ; Bingzong LI ; Shuchuan LIU ; Juan DU ; Wenrong HUANG ; Hui WEI ; Jianxiang WANG
Chinese Journal of Hematology 2018;39(6):460-464
Objective:
To evaluate the impact of KIT D816 mutation on the salvage therapy in relapsed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with t(8;21) translocation.
Method:
The characteristics of the first relapsed AML with t(8;21) translocation from 10 hospitals were retrospectively collected, complete remission (CR2) rate after one course salvage chemotherapy and the relationship between KIT mutation and CR2 rate was analyzed.
Results:
68 cases were enrolled in this study, and 30 cases (44.1%) achieved CR2. All patients received KIT mutation detection, and KIT D816 mutation was identified in 26 cases. The KIT D816 positive group had significantly lower CR2 compared with non-KIT D816 group (23.1%
2. Clinical study on different period cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy in patients with craniocerebral injury
Yingjun FAN ; Qiongfen WANG ; Shuchuan MIAO ; Haibo LIU ; Enren WANG
Chinese Journal of Postgraduates of Medicine 2020;43(1):45-49
Objective:
To investigate the clinical effects and complications of different period cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy in patients with craniocerebral injury.
Methods:
The clinical data of 96 craniocerebral injury patients who had underwent decompressive craniectomy in the First Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College from January 2014 to January 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the different time of cranioplasty, the patients were divided into early group and routine group. In the early group, 50 patients received cranioplasty between 1.5 to 3.0 months after decompressive craniectomy; while in the conventional group, 46 patients received cranioplasty between 3.1 to 6.0 months after decompressive craniectomy. The complications after cranioplasty were observed in 2 groups, and Glasgow outcome score (GOS) and Karnofsky performance score (KPS) before cranioplasty and 3, 6 and 12 months after cranioplasty were recorded.
Results:
There were no statistical difference in delayed wound healing, subcutaneous hydrops, incision infection, hydrocephalus, intracranial hemorrhage and total incidence of complications between 2 groups (