1.Area of Ostectomy in Posterior Percutaneous Endoscopic Cervical Foraminotomy: Images and Mid-term Outcomes.
Shu NAKAMURA ; Mitsuto TAGUCHI
Asian Spine Journal 2017;11(6):968-974
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective. PURPOSE: To analyze whether the cross-sectional area of the intervertebral foramen at the outermost edge of the resection site is associated with postoperative outcomes and whether our fluoroscopic method for determining the resection area is appropriate. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: There is no consensus on the criteria for determining an optimal resection area to obtain sufficient decompression while maintaining intervertebral stability in posterior percutaneous endoscopic cervical foraminotomy. Previous reports have recommended a facet resection rate (FRR) of ≤50%. Intervertebral foramen stenosis often extends to the exit zone. The cross-sectional area of the intervertebral foramen is occasionally small at the outermost edge of the resection site. No report has analyzed whether these aspects are associated with postoperative outcomes. METHODS: Lateral margins of the resection area were set at lateral borders of the vertebral body on frontal fluoroscopic view. Because the percutaneous endoscope has a small diameter, surrounding structures can easily be identified using frontal view fluoroscopy to determine the resection area. FRRs were calculated from postoperative computed tomography images. The smallest cross-sectional area of the intervertebral foramen around the lateral edge of the resection area (SALE) was measured and compared wit clinical outcomes. RESULTS: The mean FRR was 41.7% at C5–C6 and 48.9% at C6–C7. SALE was not correlated with clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Residual stenosis in the lateral portion of the intervertebral foramen is weakly associated with postoperative outcomes. Our process achieved adequate FRRs and favorable postoperative outcomes, suggesting that our criteria for determining the resection area are appropriate.
Commerce
;
Consensus
;
Constriction, Pathologic
;
Decompression
;
Endoscopes
;
Fluoroscopy
;
Foraminotomy*
;
Methods
;
Retrospective Studies
2.Use of an Internal Retractor for Percutaneous Full-Endoscopic Resection in Cervical Intervertebral Disc Herniation with a Posterior Approach
Shu NAKAMURA ; Mitsuto TAGUCHI
Asian Spine Journal 2020;14(4):489-494
Methods:
Our new internal retractor can be inserted into the working channel of a percutaneous full-endoscope, enabling the insertion of a second tool. After partial foraminotomy, the internal retractor and forceps were manipulated to reliably retract the nerve root. Finally, the herniated disc was resected under an endoscopic view.
Results:
All six cases had a good postoperative course, and postoperative neuropathy was not observed.
Conclusions
This internal retractor allows for the secure resection herniated cervical intervertebral discs.
3.Can Postural Instability Respond to Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation in Patients with Parkinson's Disease?.
Hiroshi KATAOKA ; Yohei OKADA ; Takao KIRIYAMA ; Yorihiro KITA ; Junji NAKAMURA ; Shu MORIOKA ; Koji SHOMOTO ; Satoshi UENO
Journal of Movement Disorders 2016;9(1):40-43
OBJECTIVE: Galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) activates the vestibular afferents, and these changes in vestibular input exert a strong influence on the subject's posture or standing balance. In patients with Parkinson's disease (PD), vestibular dysfunction might contribute to postural instability and gait disorders. METHODS: Current intensity was increased to 0.7 mA, and the current was applied to the patients for 20 minutes. To perform a sham stimulation, the current intensity was increased as described and then decreased to 0 mA over the course of 10 seconds. The patient's status was recorded continuously for 20 minutes with the patient in the supine position. RESULTS: Three out of 5 patients diagnosed with PD with postural instability and/or abnormal axial posture showed a reduction in postural instability after GVS. The score for item 12 of the revised Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale part 3 was decreased in these patients. CONCLUSIONS: The mechanism of postural instability is complex and not completely understood. In 2 out of the 5 patients, postural instability was not changed in response to GVS. Nonetheless, the GVS-induced change in postural instability for 3 patients in our study suggests that GVS might be a therapeutic option for postural instability.
Gait
;
Humans
;
Parkinson Disease*
;
Posture
;
Supine Position