Objective:To compare closed reduction and intramedullary nailing versus open reduction and locking plate fixation in the treatment of middle and upper humeral fractures.Methods:A retrospective case-control study was conducted to analyze the clinical data of 62 patients with middle and upper humeral fracture who had been treated at Department of Orthopaedics, The First People's Hospital of Jinmen and at Department of Orthopedics, General Hospital of PLA Central Theater from October 2017 to February 2021. There were 35 males and 27 females, aged from 27 to 86 years. The left side was affected in 24 cases and the right side in 38 cases. All fractures were fresh. According to the AO classification, 16 cases were type A, 32 type B, and 14 type C. Of the patients, 29 were treated with closed reduction and intramedullary nailing (intramedullary nail group) and 33 with open reduction and locking plate fixation (locking plate group). The length of incision, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, fracture healing and complications were recorded and compared between the 2 groups. The pain degree was evaluated by visual analogue scale (VAS) at one week and one month after operation, and the functional recovery of the shoulder was evaluated by Constant-Murley score at one month and 12 months after operation.Results:There was no significant difference in the preoperative general data between the 2 groups, showing comparability ( P>0.05). The intramedullary nail group was followed up for 12 to 29 months and the locking plate group for 15 to 50 months. In the intramedullary nail group, the length of incision [(4.1±0.7) cm], operation time [(58.3±7.7) min], intraoperative blood loss [(52.7±6.5) mL], and hospital stay [(7.3±1.5) d] were significantly less than those in the locking plate group [(21.7±2.3) cm, (95.8±11.7) min, (237.4±14.9) ml, and (12.3±1.7) d] ( P<0.05). The fracture healing time in the intramedullary nail group was (5.0±1.9) months, significantly longer than that in the locking plate group [(3.5±1.7) months] ( P<0.05). The VAS scores at one week and one month after operation in the intramedullary nail group [(2.8±0.3) points and (1.2±0.5) points] were significantly lower than those in the locking plate group [(4.3±0.4) points and (1.6±0.5) points], and the Constant-Murley score at one month after operation in the intramedullary nail group [(63.5±7.4) points] was significantly higher than that in the locking plate group [(54.3±6.9) points] ( P<0.05). However, at 12 months after operation, there was no significant difference in the Constant-Murley score between the 2 groups ( P>0.05). In both groups, the VAS score at one month after operation was significantly lower than that at one week after operation while the Constant-Murley score at 12 months after operation was significantly higher than that at one week after operation ( P<0.05). In the intramedullary nail group, intraoperative distal refracture happened in one case; in the locking plate group, incision infection occurred in one case and postoperative radial nerve injury in another. There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the 2 groups [3.4% (1/29) versus 6.1% (2/33)] ( P>0.05). Conclusion:In the treatment of middle and upper humeral fractures, compared with open reduction and locking plate fixation, closed reduction and intramedullary nailing shows advantages of a smaller surgical incision, shorter operation time, less intraoperative blood loss, shorter hospital stay and faster functional recovery.

Patients with severe trauma require an extremely timely treatment and transfusion plays an irreplaceable role in the emergency treatment of such patients. An increasing number of evidence-based medicinal evidences and clinical practices suggest that patients with severe traumatic bleeding benefit from early transfusion of low-titer group O whole blood or hemostatic resuscitation with red blood cells, plasma and platelet of a balanced ratio. However, the current domestic mode of blood supply cannot fully meet the requirements of timely and effective blood transfusion for emergency treatment of patients with severe trauma in clinical practice. In order to solve the key problems in blood supply and blood transfusion strategies for emergency treatment of severe trauma, Branch of Clinical Transfusion Medicine of Chinese Medical Association, Group for Trauma Emergency Care and Multiple Injuries of Trauma Branch of Chinese Medical Association, Young Scholar Group of Disaster Medicine Branch of Chinese Medical Association organized domestic experts of blood transfusion medicine and trauma treatment to jointly formulate Chinese expert consensus on blood support mode and blood transfusion strategies for emergency treatment of severe trauma patients ( version 2024). Based on the evidence-based medical evidence and Delphi method of expert consultation and voting, 10 recommendations were put forward from two aspects of blood support mode and transfusion strategies, aiming to provide a reference for transfusion resuscitation in the emergency treatment of severe trauma and further improve the success rate of treatment of patients with severe trauma.