Introduction : This study aimed to clarify the relationship between the presence of someone to care for and the subjective QOL (quality of life) of local elderly people.
Methods : Data for 7,728 residents aged 65 and above was obtained from the everyday life sphere needs survey implemented by the government of Nanto City, Toyama Prefecture, between May to July, 2014. Multiple logistic regression analysis was conducted to evaluate the relationship between two sets of variables : first, the presence (or absence) of “something to live for”, “sense of fulfillment”, and “self-esteem” as indicators of the respondents'subjective QOL ; and second, a set of explanatory variables (common to all models) including the presence of someone to care for, indicators of the personal attributes, health, and life style of the respondents.
Results : The presence of someone to care for was positively related to the presence of “something to live for,” “sense of fulfillment,” and “self-esteem,” which were indicators of subjective QOL, even after several indicators of personal attributes, health, and life style were accounted for.
Conclusion : Promoting mutual help in local areas has a positive significance for those elderly who take care of others, as well as for those who accept care. The results also suggest the social importance of being the recipient of care in the elderly.

Lenalidomide (LD) was reported to increase the risk of thromboembolism when it was used along with dexamethasone (DEX). Prophylactic administration of antithrombotic drugs against thromboembolism has been recommended for proper use of LD, but none of the recommendation is stated in the package insert. The purpose of this study was to elucidate the usage of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) for lenalidomide medication in patients withmultiple myeloma. We used the MDV analyzer to investigate clinical data retrospectively. The investigation period was from October 1, 2016 to September 30, 2017. Subjects were outpatients aged 20 years or older who were recorded in clinical data as multiple myeloma. There were 7,590 outpatients with multiple myeloma. They were divided into 4 groups by the combined use situation of LD and DEX: LD/DEX non-use group (n＝5,462), DEX alone group (n＝632),LD alone group (n＝203), and LD/DEX together group (n＝1,293), respectively. The prevalence rate of thromboembolism was 7.3% in the DEX alone group and 16.9% in the LD/DEX together group (p＜0.0001). Among the LD/DEX together group, ASA was prescribed at 63.6% in the group without thromboembolism (n＝1,074). The prevalence rate of thromboembolism was higher in the LD/DEX combined group than in the DEX alone group. Considering these findings, risk management for thromboembolism caused by administration of antithrombotic drugs should be considered. It is necessary to create more evidence concerning the necessity of administration of antithrombotic drug in combination with LD/DEX medication.

Low-grade epilepsy-associated tumors (LEAT) are brain tumors that should be differentiated as a cause of symptomatic epilepsy in children. The most common initial symptom is epileptic seizure, particularly focal seizures. We present a case of LEAT in which an infant presented to our department with convulsive-like seizures that were observed from approximately 3 months of age. At the first visit, growth and development, including head circumference, were appropriate for age. The seizures were atypical, but ictal video electroencephalography showed abnormal waves indicative of left hemispheric epilepsy. The patient subsequently presented with somnolence and poor feeding, and a sudden increase in head circumference and hydrocephalus were observed. Thus, the patient was urgently admitted to the neurosurgery department of our hospital. Brain MRI showed a suspected brain tumor and elective craniotomy was performed. No epileptic seizures were observed postoperatively. When focal epileptic seizures are observed in infancy, a brain tumor should also be considered as a differential diagnosis, and further examination may be warranted.

Objective：Studies on upper extremity functional interventions for patients with spinal cord infarction are limited, and the effectiveness of the interventions for upper limb paresis in such patients have not been elucidated. This case report describes evidence-based spinal cord injury interventions that improved upper extremity function in a patient with spinal cord infarction.Methods：A man in his 60s presented with mild right hemiplegia because of right anterior spinal artery infarction in the C5 medullary segment. Upon admission, the patient had an American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale of D, lacked cognitive impairment, and demonstrated independence indoors with ambulation. The intervention included a combination of robotic therapy and electrical stimulation, adherence-enhancing behavioral strategies (Transfer Package), and typical occupational therapy. We recorded the following upper extremity functional scores：①Active Range of Motion of the shoulder, ②Passive Range of Motion of the shoulder, ③Manual Muscle Test, ④Grip strength, ⑤Pinch strength, ⑥Action Research Arm Test, ⑦Simple Test for Evaluating Hand Function, and ⑧Motor Activity Log.Results：After intervention therapy for 39 days, upper extremity function and the degree and quality of arm use in daily activities improved.Conclusion：These results suggest that evidence-based interventions for spinal cord injury could improve upper extremity function and the degree and quality of arm use in daily activities in patients with cervical spinal cord infarcti.

Superior vena cava syndrome (SVCS), which is characterized by facial edema and congestion of the head, upper extremities, and neck, is a life-threatening oncologic emergency. Although a combination of chemotherapy and radiation therapy has been considered as the standard treatment for SVCS, stent implantation to the superior vena cava (SVC) has been recently developed to alleviate edema or dyspnea caused by SVCS. On the other hand, stent implantation to the SVC requires skilled interventional cardiologists or radiologists. In general, those specialists reside in university hospitals or large hospitals in an urban area. In this case report, an 86-year-old man underwent stent implantation to a stenosed SVC in a rural area. Because the patient refused the transfer to the core, urban hospital, we invited a skilled interventional cardiologist from the core hospital and performed stent implantation to the SVC in a small, rural hospital. It is generally difficult to perform stent implantation for SVCS in a small hospital, because skilled operators in the field of interventional cardiology or radiology do not usually perform operations in smaller facilities. Our case indicates the importance of cooperation between rural generalists and urban specialists.