1.An Operative Case of Chronic Contained Rupture of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm with Retroperitoneal Hematoma Distended Assembling a Giant Tumor.
Yoshiki Nonami ; Yasunaga Okazaki ; Kouzi Satou ; Akira Yamamoto ; Toshiyuki Yamashiro ; Shohei Ogoshi
Japanese Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery 1994;23(4):296-299
We report the operative treatment of a chronic contained rupture of a saccular abdominal aortic aneurysm with a retroperitoneal hematoma. A 62-year-oldman walked into our hospital complaining of a painless abdominal mass and intermittent claudication. He had an episode of severe abdominal pain about 2 years prior to admission. A giant retroperitoneal neoplasm was suspected initially based on computed tomography (CT). However, magnetic resonance imaging, angiography and color doppler sonography demonstrated a chronic contained rupture of an abdominal aortic aneurysm. At laparotomy, a punched out oval defect (width 3.5cm×length 4.5cm) that was thought to connect the thrombosed aneurysm to an organized retroperitoneal hematoma was discovered in the posterior wall of the bifurcation of the aorta. An infrarenal aorto-biexternal iliac Y-graft with a bypass to the left femoral artery was placed without removing the aneurysm or the hematoma. Uneventful recovery followed. About one year after the operation, the retroperitoneal hematoma appeared smaller on CT scan. This case fulfilled the criteria for a “chronic contained rupture” of an abdominal aortic aneurysm proposed by Jones and associates.
2.Survey of cattle fascioliasis in Tsuyama Abattoir.
Masahiko KATO ; Yasuyuki MURAKAMI ; Motota SHIMIZU ; Hideki YAMAMOTO ; Yumi YONEMOTO ; Ken-Ichi ISHII ; Shohei KIRA
Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine 2005;10(3):162-165
OBJECTIVESThe aim of this study was to survey the prevalence of fascioliasis in slaughtered cattle in order to provide breeders with feedback which may prevent cattle fascioliasis, as well as human fascioliasis.
METHODSThe results of meat inspection and the information extracted from the Discriminative Data Base on Individual Livestock in Japan were analyzed statistically in 6,224 cattle slaughtered at the Tsuyama Abattoir during the fiscal year 2002.
RESULTSThe age-adjusted fascioliasis and cholangitis rates of all cattle were 2.0% and 7.2%, respectively. When analyzed by cattle breed, both rates were significantly higher in Japanese native cattle than in Holstein or Jersey (Chi-square test, p<0.01). The cattle raised in Okayama Prefecture, Tochigi Prefecture and Shimane Prefecture were significantly different from cattle raised in other prefectures in the age-adjusted fascioliasis and cholangitis rates.
CONCLUSIONThe age-adjusted fascioliasis and cholangitis rates of all cattle can be considered as nationwide rates for slaughtered cattle. The results of the comparisons suggest that cattle fascioliasis is related to feeding with rice straw and that the measures to prevent cattle fascioliasis might differ a mong prefectural governments.
3.Investigation for the Effect of jingizai on Long-term Prognosis and Differences Between Histopathological types in 139 Cases of Ovarian Cancer
Shinichi YAMAMOTO ; Ayako OSAFUNE ; Junko MATSUI ; Keita NAKANE ; Shohei IKEDA
Kampo Medicine 2019;70(4):376-383
Using the data of 139 ovarian cancer cases at our hospital, we investigated the effect of jingizai on prognosis when it was combined with standard therapy for ovarian cancer and prognosis by histopathological types. Combining jingizai with standard therapy was not effective in cases of stage I-II ovarian cancer, but it was effective in cases of stage III-IV ovarian cancer. Upon examination the effectiveness of jingizai according to histopathological types, we observed some improved prognosis in serous adenocarcinoma and mucinous adenocarcinoma cases ; however, prognosis didn't improve in endometrioid adenocarcinoma and clear cell adenocarcinoma. These results indicate that the effectiveness of combining jingizai with standard therapy may differ depending on histological type of ovarian cancer. When we investigated the difference between the distribution of histopathological types by cancer staging, we frequently found clear cell adenocarcinoma in stage I-II cancer cases. Also, serous adenocarcinoma and poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma had a high frequency among stage III-IV cancer cases. This difference may be the reason that the effectiveness of jingizai is different depending on the advances of each stage. However, no statistical difference was confirmed due to the small number of subjects analyzed. Analysis of larger sample size, which can be collected by performing collaborative studies with other facilities, will be required for more detailed investigation.
4.Planning evaluation of stereotactic magnetic resonance–guided online adaptive radiosurgery for kidney tumors close to the organ at risk: is it valuable to wait for good timing to perform stereotactic radiosurgery?
Takaya YAMAMOTO ; Shohei TANAKA ; Noriyoshi TAKAHASHI ; Rei UMEZAWA ; Yu SUZUKI ; Keita KISHIDA ; So OMATA ; Kazuya TAKEDA ; Hinako HARADA ; Kiyokazu SATO ; Yoshiyuki KATSUTA ; Noriyuki KADOYA ; Keiichi JINGU
Radiation Oncology Journal 2025;43(1):40-48
Purpose:
This study aimed to investigate changes in target coverage using magnetic resonance–guided online adaptive radiotherapy (MRgoART) for kidney tumors and to evaluate the suitable timing of treatment.
Materials and Methods:
Among patients treated with 3-fraction MRgoART for kidney cancer, 18 tumors located within 1 cm of the gastrointestinal tract were selected. Stereotactic radiosurgery planning with a prescription dose of 26 Gy was performed using pretreatment simulation and three MRgoART timings with an adapt-to-shape method. The best MRgoART plan was defined as the plan achieving the highest percentage of planning target volume (PTV) coverage of 26 Gy. In clinical scenario simulation, MRgoART plans were evaluated in the order of actual treatment. Waiting for the next timing was done when the PTV coverage of 26 Gy did not achieve 95%–99% or did not increase by 5% or more compared to the pretreatment plan.
Results:
The median percentages of PTV receiving 26 Gy in pretreatment and the first, second, and third MRgoART were 82% (range, 19%), 63% (range, 7% to 99%), 88% (range, 31% to 99%), and 95% (range, 3% to 99%), respectively. Comparing pretreatment simulation plans with the best MRgoART plans showed a significant difference (p = 0.025). In the clinical scenario simulation, 16 of the 18 planning series, including nine plans with 95%–99% PTV coverage of 26 Gy and seven plans with increased PTV coverage by 5% or more, would be irradiated at a good timing.
Conclusion
MRgoART revealed dose coverage differences at each MRgoART timing. Waiting for optimal irradiation timing could be an option in case of suboptimal timing.
5.Planning evaluation of stereotactic magnetic resonance–guided online adaptive radiosurgery for kidney tumors close to the organ at risk: is it valuable to wait for good timing to perform stereotactic radiosurgery?
Takaya YAMAMOTO ; Shohei TANAKA ; Noriyoshi TAKAHASHI ; Rei UMEZAWA ; Yu SUZUKI ; Keita KISHIDA ; So OMATA ; Kazuya TAKEDA ; Hinako HARADA ; Kiyokazu SATO ; Yoshiyuki KATSUTA ; Noriyuki KADOYA ; Keiichi JINGU
Radiation Oncology Journal 2025;43(1):40-48
Purpose:
This study aimed to investigate changes in target coverage using magnetic resonance–guided online adaptive radiotherapy (MRgoART) for kidney tumors and to evaluate the suitable timing of treatment.
Materials and Methods:
Among patients treated with 3-fraction MRgoART for kidney cancer, 18 tumors located within 1 cm of the gastrointestinal tract were selected. Stereotactic radiosurgery planning with a prescription dose of 26 Gy was performed using pretreatment simulation and three MRgoART timings with an adapt-to-shape method. The best MRgoART plan was defined as the plan achieving the highest percentage of planning target volume (PTV) coverage of 26 Gy. In clinical scenario simulation, MRgoART plans were evaluated in the order of actual treatment. Waiting for the next timing was done when the PTV coverage of 26 Gy did not achieve 95%–99% or did not increase by 5% or more compared to the pretreatment plan.
Results:
The median percentages of PTV receiving 26 Gy in pretreatment and the first, second, and third MRgoART were 82% (range, 19%), 63% (range, 7% to 99%), 88% (range, 31% to 99%), and 95% (range, 3% to 99%), respectively. Comparing pretreatment simulation plans with the best MRgoART plans showed a significant difference (p = 0.025). In the clinical scenario simulation, 16 of the 18 planning series, including nine plans with 95%–99% PTV coverage of 26 Gy and seven plans with increased PTV coverage by 5% or more, would be irradiated at a good timing.
Conclusion
MRgoART revealed dose coverage differences at each MRgoART timing. Waiting for optimal irradiation timing could be an option in case of suboptimal timing.
6.Planning evaluation of stereotactic magnetic resonance–guided online adaptive radiosurgery for kidney tumors close to the organ at risk: is it valuable to wait for good timing to perform stereotactic radiosurgery?
Takaya YAMAMOTO ; Shohei TANAKA ; Noriyoshi TAKAHASHI ; Rei UMEZAWA ; Yu SUZUKI ; Keita KISHIDA ; So OMATA ; Kazuya TAKEDA ; Hinako HARADA ; Kiyokazu SATO ; Yoshiyuki KATSUTA ; Noriyuki KADOYA ; Keiichi JINGU
Radiation Oncology Journal 2025;43(1):40-48
Purpose:
This study aimed to investigate changes in target coverage using magnetic resonance–guided online adaptive radiotherapy (MRgoART) for kidney tumors and to evaluate the suitable timing of treatment.
Materials and Methods:
Among patients treated with 3-fraction MRgoART for kidney cancer, 18 tumors located within 1 cm of the gastrointestinal tract were selected. Stereotactic radiosurgery planning with a prescription dose of 26 Gy was performed using pretreatment simulation and three MRgoART timings with an adapt-to-shape method. The best MRgoART plan was defined as the plan achieving the highest percentage of planning target volume (PTV) coverage of 26 Gy. In clinical scenario simulation, MRgoART plans were evaluated in the order of actual treatment. Waiting for the next timing was done when the PTV coverage of 26 Gy did not achieve 95%–99% or did not increase by 5% or more compared to the pretreatment plan.
Results:
The median percentages of PTV receiving 26 Gy in pretreatment and the first, second, and third MRgoART were 82% (range, 19%), 63% (range, 7% to 99%), 88% (range, 31% to 99%), and 95% (range, 3% to 99%), respectively. Comparing pretreatment simulation plans with the best MRgoART plans showed a significant difference (p = 0.025). In the clinical scenario simulation, 16 of the 18 planning series, including nine plans with 95%–99% PTV coverage of 26 Gy and seven plans with increased PTV coverage by 5% or more, would be irradiated at a good timing.
Conclusion
MRgoART revealed dose coverage differences at each MRgoART timing. Waiting for optimal irradiation timing could be an option in case of suboptimal timing.
7.Planning evaluation of stereotactic magnetic resonance–guided online adaptive radiosurgery for kidney tumors close to the organ at risk: is it valuable to wait for good timing to perform stereotactic radiosurgery?
Takaya YAMAMOTO ; Shohei TANAKA ; Noriyoshi TAKAHASHI ; Rei UMEZAWA ; Yu SUZUKI ; Keita KISHIDA ; So OMATA ; Kazuya TAKEDA ; Hinako HARADA ; Kiyokazu SATO ; Yoshiyuki KATSUTA ; Noriyuki KADOYA ; Keiichi JINGU
Radiation Oncology Journal 2025;43(1):40-48
Purpose:
This study aimed to investigate changes in target coverage using magnetic resonance–guided online adaptive radiotherapy (MRgoART) for kidney tumors and to evaluate the suitable timing of treatment.
Materials and Methods:
Among patients treated with 3-fraction MRgoART for kidney cancer, 18 tumors located within 1 cm of the gastrointestinal tract were selected. Stereotactic radiosurgery planning with a prescription dose of 26 Gy was performed using pretreatment simulation and three MRgoART timings with an adapt-to-shape method. The best MRgoART plan was defined as the plan achieving the highest percentage of planning target volume (PTV) coverage of 26 Gy. In clinical scenario simulation, MRgoART plans were evaluated in the order of actual treatment. Waiting for the next timing was done when the PTV coverage of 26 Gy did not achieve 95%–99% or did not increase by 5% or more compared to the pretreatment plan.
Results:
The median percentages of PTV receiving 26 Gy in pretreatment and the first, second, and third MRgoART were 82% (range, 19%), 63% (range, 7% to 99%), 88% (range, 31% to 99%), and 95% (range, 3% to 99%), respectively. Comparing pretreatment simulation plans with the best MRgoART plans showed a significant difference (p = 0.025). In the clinical scenario simulation, 16 of the 18 planning series, including nine plans with 95%–99% PTV coverage of 26 Gy and seven plans with increased PTV coverage by 5% or more, would be irradiated at a good timing.
Conclusion
MRgoART revealed dose coverage differences at each MRgoART timing. Waiting for optimal irradiation timing could be an option in case of suboptimal timing.
8.Planning evaluation of stereotactic magnetic resonance–guided online adaptive radiosurgery for kidney tumors close to the organ at risk: is it valuable to wait for good timing to perform stereotactic radiosurgery?
Takaya YAMAMOTO ; Shohei TANAKA ; Noriyoshi TAKAHASHI ; Rei UMEZAWA ; Yu SUZUKI ; Keita KISHIDA ; So OMATA ; Kazuya TAKEDA ; Hinako HARADA ; Kiyokazu SATO ; Yoshiyuki KATSUTA ; Noriyuki KADOYA ; Keiichi JINGU
Radiation Oncology Journal 2025;43(1):40-48
Purpose:
This study aimed to investigate changes in target coverage using magnetic resonance–guided online adaptive radiotherapy (MRgoART) for kidney tumors and to evaluate the suitable timing of treatment.
Materials and Methods:
Among patients treated with 3-fraction MRgoART for kidney cancer, 18 tumors located within 1 cm of the gastrointestinal tract were selected. Stereotactic radiosurgery planning with a prescription dose of 26 Gy was performed using pretreatment simulation and three MRgoART timings with an adapt-to-shape method. The best MRgoART plan was defined as the plan achieving the highest percentage of planning target volume (PTV) coverage of 26 Gy. In clinical scenario simulation, MRgoART plans were evaluated in the order of actual treatment. Waiting for the next timing was done when the PTV coverage of 26 Gy did not achieve 95%–99% or did not increase by 5% or more compared to the pretreatment plan.
Results:
The median percentages of PTV receiving 26 Gy in pretreatment and the first, second, and third MRgoART were 82% (range, 19%), 63% (range, 7% to 99%), 88% (range, 31% to 99%), and 95% (range, 3% to 99%), respectively. Comparing pretreatment simulation plans with the best MRgoART plans showed a significant difference (p = 0.025). In the clinical scenario simulation, 16 of the 18 planning series, including nine plans with 95%–99% PTV coverage of 26 Gy and seven plans with increased PTV coverage by 5% or more, would be irradiated at a good timing.
Conclusion
MRgoART revealed dose coverage differences at each MRgoART timing. Waiting for optimal irradiation timing could be an option in case of suboptimal timing.