Background/Aims: No screening test for esophageal motility disorder (EMD) has been established, the objective of this study is to examine the potential usefulness of our newly developed “Onigiri esophagography” combined with an obstruction level (OL) classification system in screening for EMD. Methods: A total of 102 patients with suspected EMDs who underwent both high-resolution manometry (HRM) and Onigiri esophagography between April 2017 and January 2019 were examined. The EMD diagnosis was performed based on the Chicago classification version 3.0 by HRM. Onigiri esophagography was performed using a liquid medium (barium sulfate) followed by a solid medium, which consisted of an Onigiri (a Japanese rice ball) with barium powder. The extent of medium obstruction was assessed by the OL classification, which was defined in a stepwise fashion from OL0 (no obstruction) to OL4 (severe obstruction). Results: The patients with OL0 (32.3%), OL1 (50.0%), OL2 (88.0%), OL3 (100.0%), and OL4 (100.0%) were diagnosed EMDs by HRM. The area under the curve, as determined by a receiver operating characteristic analysis, for the OL classification was 0.86. Using the cutoff value of OL1, the sensitivity and specificity were 87.3% and 61.3%, respectively, while using a cutoff value of OL2, the sensitivity and specificity were 73.2% and 90.3%, respectively. Conclusion In conclusion, Onigiri esophagography combined with the OL classification system can be used as a screening test for EMDs with a cutoff value of OL1.

Objective: To clarify whether early mobilization is a predictive factor for ambulation recovery in elderly patients and/or patients with severe subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH).Methods: This multicenter retrospective observational study included 471 patients with treated SAH (Group 1). We focused on SAH patients with a poor prognosis, including a subgroup of elderly SAH patients (age>65 years:n=203) (Group 2) and patients with severe SAH (World Federation of Neurological Societies [WFNS] grade IV or V:n=117) (Group 3). The chi-square test and Mann-Whitney U test were used to compare the differences between the ambulation recovery group and the non-recovery group. Multivariable logistic regression analysis modeling was used to estimate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals of early mobilization for the ambulation-recovered group within 30 days of onset compared with the unrecovered group. Other covariates examined as possible confounders of the outcome were age, sex, location of the ruptured aneurysm, modified Fisher scale score, WFNS grade, mode of treatment (surgical vs. endovascular), duration of cerebrospinal fluid drainage, days on mechanical ventilation, intracerebral hemorrhage, symptomatic cerebral vasospasm, complications, shunt placement for hydrocephalus, and time to start mobilization.Results: Early mobilization was an independent predictive factor for gait recovery in all groups. Furthermore, location of the ruptured aneurysm (anterior circulation), absence of complications, and absence of shunt placement were independent factors for ambulation recovery in all groups.Conclusion: Early mobilization in elder or/and sever patients with SAH may be a predictive factor for ambulation recovery within 30 days of onset.

Objective: To clarify whether early mobilization is a predictive factor for ambulation recovery in elderly patients and/or patients with severe subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH).Methods: This multicenter retrospective observational study included 471 patients with treated SAH (Group 1). We focused on SAH patients with a poor prognosis, including a subgroup of elderly SAH patients (age>65 years: n=203) (Group 2) and patients with severe SAH (World Federation of Neurological Societies [WFNS] grade IV or V: n=117) (Group 3). The chi-square test and Mann-Whitney U test were used to compare the differences between the ambulation recovery group and the non-recovery group. Multivariable logistic regression analysis modeling was used to estimate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals of early mobilization for the ambulation-recovered group within 30 days of onset compared with the unrecovered group. Other covariates examined as possible confounders of the outcome were age, sex, location of the ruptured aneurysm, modified Fisher scale score, WFNS grade, mode of treatment (surgical vs. endovascular), duration of cerebrospinal fluid drainage, days on mechanical ventilation, intracerebral hemorrhage, symptomatic cerebral vasospasm, complications, shunt placement for hydrocephalus, and time to start mobilization.Results: Early mobilization was an independent predictive factor for gait recovery in all groups. Furthermore, location of the ruptured aneurysm (anterior circulation), absence of complications, and absence of shunt placement were independent factors for ambulation recovery in all groups.Conclusion: Early mobilization in elder or/and sever patients with SAH may be a predictive factor for ambulation recovery within 30 days of onset.